Concentrating creativity: The planning of formal and informal arts districts

City, Culture and Society

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 225-234

  Chapple, Karen ^a   Jackson, Shannon ^a   Martin, Anne J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arts districts; Flagship; Informal; Redevelopment; Revitalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952466900     PISSN: 18779166     EISSN: 18779174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Council and for the Arts The arts in the economic life of the city 1979, ACA Publications, New York.
2. Berkeley Civic Arts Commission (2004). Arts and Culture Plan, City of Berkeley. (Accessed September 1, 2010.). http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/uploadedFiles/City_Manager/Level_3_-_Civic_Arts/FinalArtsCulturePlan.pdf.
3. Brooks A., Kushner R. Cultural districts and urban development. International Journal of Arts Management 2001, 3(2):4-14.
4. Chapple K., Jackson S. Arts, neighborhoods, and social practices: Towards an integrated epistemology of community arts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2010, 29(4):478-490.
5. Galligan A. The evolution of arts and cultural districts. Understanding the arts and creative sector in the United States 2008, 129-142. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick. J.M. Cherbo, R.A. Stewart, M.J. Wyszomirski (Eds.).
6. Gotsill, G. (2008, April 4). Berkeley downtown evolution: More residents, retail, San Francisco Business Times.
7. Grodach C. Beyond Bilbao: Rethinking flagship cultural development and planning in three California cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2010, 29(3):353-366.
8. Jackson M.-R., Kabwasa-Green F., Herranz J. Cultural vitality in communities: Interpretation and indicators 2006, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
9. Markusen A., Gadwa A. Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2010, 29(3):379-391.
10. Piore M.J., Sabel C. The second industrial divide 1984, Basic Books, New York.
11. Roy A. Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 2005, 71(2):147-158.
12. Stern, M., Seifert, S. (1998). Community revitalization and the arts in Philadelphia, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Social Impact of the Arts Project (SIAP).
13. Stern, M., Seifert, S. (2005). 'Natural' cultural districts: Arts agglomerations in metropolitan Philadelphia and implications for cultural district planning, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Social Impact of the Arts Project (SIAP).
14. Stern M., Seifert S. Cultural clusters: The implications of cultural assets agglomeration for neighborhood revitalization. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2010, 29(3):262-279.
15. Torres, B. (2009, April 10). Oakland's new luxury rentals offer S.F.-style amenities, San Francisco Business Times.
16. Vivant E. How Underground Culture is Changing Paris. Urban Research and Practices 2009, 2(1):36-52.
17. Vivant E. The (re)making of Paris as a bohemian place?. Progress in Planning 2010, 74(3):107-152.
18. Wodsak, A. (2008). Building arts, building community? Informal arts districts and neighborhood change in Oakland, California, Unpublished master's thesis, Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.
19. Zamora, H. (2006, August 4). Oakland psst: Art murmur, San Francisco Chronicle.
20. Zukin S. Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change 1982, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
21. King, J. (2001, October 28). Arts center at stage one/With Aurora and Jazzschool, Berkeley's new downtown district takes shape. San Francisco Chronicle.
22. (November 2007) Rock America, Nylon.