Beyond bilbao: Rethinking flagship cultural development and planning in three California cities

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 353-366

  Grodach, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Arts; Cultural economy; Economic development; Flagship cultural projects; Redevelopment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649259515     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X09354452     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aidala, T., and R. Skevos. 2003. The San Jose experience: Vision, plan, strategy. Places 15 (2): 12-19.
2. Anderson, G. 2004. The Milwaukee effect: If you build it, will they come? Second-tier cities are making big bets on high-end architecture. CNN Money. August 6.
3. Athey, R. 2004. We-Ho voices. LA Weekly. November 24.
4. Attoe, W., and D. Logan. 1989. American urban architecture: Catalysts in the design of cities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5. Baker, K. 1995. Taking art into their own hands: Artist-run galleries prove local vitality. San Francisco Chronicle. June 2.
6. Berelowitz, J-A. 1991. L.A. stories: Of art, MOCA, and city building. PhD diss., University of California-Los Angeles.
7. Bianchini, F., J. Dawson, and R. Evans. 1992. Flagship projects in urban regeneration. In Rebuilding the city: Property-led urban regeneration, ed. P. Healy, S. Davoudi, M. O'Toole, S. Tavsanoglu, and D. Usher. London: E&FN Spon.
8. Borrup, T. 2006. The creative community builder's handbook: How to transform communities using local assets, art, and culture. Saint Paul, MN: Fieldstone Alliance.
9. Center for the Arts at Yerba Buena Gardens. 1994. Annual report.
10. City of San Jose. 2003. San Jose economic development strategy executive summary.
11. Claiborne, J. 2003. Rebuilding downtown San Jose: A redevelopment success story. Places 15 (2): 4-11.
12. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles. 1979. Development offering: Remaining 8.75 acres of Bunker Hill.
13. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles. 1981. Report on the proposed disposition and development agreement for the lease and purchase of parcels R, S, T, U, & Y-1: Bunker Hill urban renewal project.
14. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles. 1990. Bunker Hill Redevelopment Project Biennial Report, 1988-90.
15. Cultural Planning Technical Assistance Committee. 1983. Recommendations regarding the Yerba Buena Gardens cultural facilities. San Francisco, CA.
16. Davis, M. 1990. City of quartz. New York: Vintage.
17. De Frantz, M. 2005. From cultural regeneration to discursive governance: Constructing the flagship of the MuseumsQuartier Vienna as a plural symbol of change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1): 50-66.
18. Dreyfus, J. 1981. On MOCA board: Artists given a say in art museum design. Los Angeles Times. January 12.
19. Eisinger, P. 2000. The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review 35 (3): 316-33.
20. Evans, G. 2003. Hard branding the cultural city-From Prado to Prada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (2): 417-30.
21. Evans, G. 2005. Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 17-430.
22. Evans, G., and J. Foord. 2008. Cultural mapping and sustainable communities: Planning for the arts revisited, Cultural Trends 17 (2): 65-96.
23. Friedrich, K. 2002. The list: Downtown galleries. Downtown News. March. http://www.downtownnews.com/TopCo/02-25-02list.html (accessed March 1, 2008).
24. Friedrich, K. 2005. The list: Downtown galleries. Downtown News. March. http://www.downtownnews.com/TopCo/02-25-05list.html (accessed March 1, 2008).
25. Garcia, B. 2005. Deconstructing the city of culture: The long-term cultural legacies of Glasgow. Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 841-68.
26. Gomez, M. 1998. Reflective images: The case of urban regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (22) 1: 106-121.
27. Grodach, C. 2008a. Looking beyond image and tourism: The role of flagship cultural projects in local arts development planning. Practice and Research 23 (4): 495-516.
28. Grodach, C. 2008b. Museums as urban catalysts: The role of urban design in flagship cultural development. Journal of Urban Design 13 (2): 195-212.
29. Hamnett, C., and N. Shoval. 2003. Museums as flagships of urban development. In Cities and visitors: Regulating people, markets, and city space, ed. L. Hoffman, S. Fainstein, and D. Judd. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
30. Hartman, C. 2002. City for sale: The transformation of San Francisco. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
31. Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
32. Kong, L. 2007. Cultural icons and urban development in Asia: Economic imperative, national identity, and global city status. Political Geography 26:383-404.
33. Lion, L., and C. Hernandez. 2006. The list: Downtown galleries. Downtown News. March. http://www.downtownnews.com/TopCo/10-02-06list.html (accessed March 1, 2007).
34. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and T. Banerjee. 1998. Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
35. Markusen, A., and G. Schrock. 2006. The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies 43 (10): 1661-86.
36. Miles, M. 2005. Interruptions: Testing the rhetoric of culturally-led urban development. Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 889-911.
37. Miles, S. 2005. Our Tyne: Iconic regeneration and the revitalisation of identity in Newcastle Gateshead. Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 913-26.
38. Museum of Contemporary Art. n.d. MOCA members, visitors, and vital statistics.
39. Plaza, B. 2000. Evaluating the influence of a large cultural artifact in the attraction of tourism: the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao case. Urban Affairs Review 36 (2): 264-74.
40. Plaza, B. 2006. The return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 452-67.
41. Plaza, B., and S. Haarich. 2008. The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in scientific journals: Asymmetries between the American art perspective and the European regional planning viewpoint. MPRA Paper No. 10751.
42. Rodríguez, A., E. Martínez, and G. Guenaga. 2001. Uneven redevelopment: New urban policies and socio-spatial fragmentation in metropolitan Bilbao. European Urban and Regional Studies 8 (2): 161-78.
43. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. 2004. Visitor survey.
44. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. 2005. 2004 annual report.
45. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. 1969. A major opportunity to invest in San Francisco.
46. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. 1979. Official redevelopment plan for the Yerba Buena Center approved redevelopment project.
47. San Jose Museum of Art. 2005. Visitor survey results.
48. San Jose Redevelopment Agency. 2006. Downtown demographic report.
49. San Jose Repertory Theatre. 2005. Customer lifestyles project. Prepared by Absolute Insights.
50. Sarkar, P. 2005. The new face of retail: Mimicked main streets, mall makeovers seek to lure shoppers. San Francisco Chronicle. May 3.
51. Smyth, H. 1994. Marketing the city: The role of flagship developments in urban regeneration. New York: Routledge.
52. Solnit, R., and S. Schwartzenberg. 2000. Hollow city: Gentrification and the eviction of urban culture. London: Verso.
53. Sternberg, E. 2002. What makes buildings catalytic? How cultural facilities can be designed to spur surrounding development. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 19 (1): 30-43.
54. Strom, E. 1999. Let's put on a show! Performing arts and urban revitalization in Newark, New Jersey. Journal of Urban Affairs 21 (4): 423-35.
55. Strom, E. 2002. From pork to porcelain: Cultural institutions and downtown development. Urban Affairs Review 38 (1): 3-21.
56. Swyngedouw, E., F. Moulaert, and A. Rodriguez. 2002. Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34 (3): 542-57.
57. Szanto, A. 2003. Hot and cool: Some contrasts between the visual art worlds of New York and Los Angeles. In New York and Los Angeles: Politics, society, culture, ed. D. Halle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Tech Museum of Innovation. 2005. Visitor survey results.
59. US Census Bureau. 2004. American Community Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60. Van Aalst, I., and I. Boogaarts. 2002. From museum to mass entertainment: The evolution of the role of museums in cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 9 (3): 195-209.
61. Vicario, L., and P. Martinez Monje. 2003. Another Guggenheim effect? The generation of a potentially gentrifiable neighbourhood in Bilbao. Urban Studies 40 (12): 2383-400.
62. Whiting, S. 1996. Mission Street comeback South of Market artery's growth lures workers, tourists and culturally curious. San Francisco Chronicle. May 3.
63. Yerba Buena Center for the Arts. 2003. Member and audience profile.
64. Yerba Buena Center for the Arts. 2004. Attendance report.
65. Zenk, J. 2005. Support systems: Art & artists in Silicon Valley. Master's Professional Report, University of California-Berkeley, Department of City and Regional Planning.