Breast cancer detection with gabor features from digital Mammograms

Algorithms

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 44-62

  Zheng, Yufeng ^a  

^a ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Calcification detection; Computer aided detection (CAD); Edge histogram descriptor (EHD); Gabor filter; Mammography screening; Mass Detection

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952466880     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/a3010044     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ACR BI-RADS - Mammography, Ultrasound & Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 4th ed.; American College of Radiology: Reston, VA, USA, 2003.
2. Kegelmeyer, W.P., Jr., Pruneda, J.M.; Bourland, P.D.; Hillis, A.; Riggs, M.W.; Nipper, M.L. Computer-aided mammographic screening for speculated lesions. Radiology 1994, 191, 331-337.
3. Liu, S.L.; Babbs, C.F.; Delp, E.J. MultiResolution Detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2001, 10, 874-884.
4. Matsubara, T.; Fujita, H.; Endo, T.; Horita, K.; Ikeda, M.; Kido, C.; Ishigaki, T. Development of mass detection algorithm based on adaptive thresholding technique in digital mammograms. In Digital Mammogrpahy; Doi, K., Giger, M.L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 391-396.
5. Qian, W.; Li, L.; Clarke, L.; Clark, R.A.; Thomas, J. Comparison of adaptive and non adaptive CAD methods for mass detection. Acad. Radiol. 1999, 6, 471-480.
6. Feig, S.A.; Galkin, B.M.; Muir, H.D. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen radiographs. In Recent Results in Cancer Research; Brunner, S., Langfeldt, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1987; Vol. 105; pp. 111-123.
7. Sickles, E.A. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 1986, 160, 289-293.
8. Yu, S.N.; Li, K.Y.; Huang, Y.K. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2006, 30, 163-173.
9. Soltanian-Zadeh, H.; Rafiee-Rad, F.; Pourabdollah-Nejad, S. Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 2004, 37, 1973-1986.
10. Haralick, R.M. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 1979, 67, 786-804.
11. Bhangale, T.; Desai, U.B.; Sharma, U. An unsupervised scheme for detection of microcalci cations on mammograms. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 10-13, 2000; pp. 184-187.
12. Rogova, G.L.; Stomper, P.C.; Ke, C. Microcalcification texture analysis in a hybrid system for computer aided mammography. Proc. SPIE 1999, 3661, 1426-1433.
13. Heath, M.; Bowyer, K.W.; Kopans, D.; Moore, R.; Kegelmeyer, P. Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In Digital Mammography; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1998; pp.457-460.
14. Nielsen, M., Johansen, P., Olsen, O.F., Weickert, J., Eds. Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999; Vol. 1682.
15. ter Haar Romeny, B.M., Florack, L., Koenderink, J., Eds. Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1997; Vol. 1252.
16. Perona, P.; Malik, J. Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1990, 12, 629-639.
17. Barash, D.; Comaniciu, D. A common framework for nonlinear diffusion, adaptive smoothing, bilateral filtering and mean shift. Image Vis. Comput. 2004, 22, 73-81.
18. Weickert, J.; ter Haar Romeny, B.M.; Viergever, M.A. Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1998, 7, 398-410.
19. Gonzalez, R.C.; Woods, R.E. Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002.
20. Weldon, T.P.; Higgins, W.E.; Dunn, D.F. Gabor filter design for multiple texture segmentation. Opt. Eng. 1996, 35, 2852-2863.
21. Jones, J.P.; Palmer, L.A. The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1987, 58, 1187-1211.
22. Chang, S.F.; Sikora, T.; Puri, A. Overview of the MPEG-7 standard. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 2001, 11, 688-695.
23. Won, C.S.; Park, D.K.; Park, S.J. Efficient use of MPEG-7 edge histogram descriptor. ETRI J. 2002, 24, 23-30.
24. Bezdec, J.C. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981.
25. Bowd, C.; Medeiros, F.A.; Zhang, Z.; Zangwill, L.M.; Hao, J.; Lee, T.W.; Sejnowski, T.J.; Weinreb, R.N.; Goldbaum, M.H. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 1322-1329.
26. Zangwill, L.M.; Chan, K.; Bowd, C.; Hao, J.; Lee, T.W.; Weinreb, R.N.; Sejnowski, T.J.; Goldbaum, M.H. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3144-3151.
27. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography. In Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2nd ed.; Bovik, A., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; Chapter 10.4, pp. 1195-1217.