The tissue residue approach for toxicity assessment: Findings and critical reviews from a society of environmental toxicology and chemistry pellston workshop

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 2-6

  Meador, James P ^a   Adams, William J ^b   Escher, Beate I ^c   McCarty, Lynn S ^d   McElroy, Anne E ^e   Sappingtonyy, Keith G ^f  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b RIO TINTO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d LS McCarty Scientific Research and Consulting   (Canada)

^e STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical review; Pellston workshop; Tissue residue toxicity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EDITORIAL; POLLUTANT; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMALS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 79952461677     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.133     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Barron MG, Hansen JA, Lipton J. 2002. Association between contaminant tissue residues and effects in aquatic organisms. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 173:1-37.
2. Escher BI, Hermens JLM. 2002. Modes of action in ecotoxicology: Their role in body burdens, species sensitivity, QSARs, and mixture effects. Environ Sci Technol 36:4201-4217.
3. Escher BI, Hermens JLM. 2004. Internal exposure: Linking bioavailability to effects. Environ Sci Technol 38:455A-462A.
4. Keith JO. 1996. Residue analysis: How they were used to assess the hazards of contaminants to wildlife. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW, editors. Environmental contaminants in wildlife: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis. p 1-47.
5. Lipnick RL. 1995. Structure-activity relationships. In: Rand GM, editor. Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology II: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment. Bristol (PA): Taylor and Francis. p 609-665.
6. McCarty LS. 1991. Toxicant body residues: Implications for Aquatic Bioassays with Some Organic Chemicals. In: Mayes MA, Barron MG, editors. Aquatic Toxicology and Risk Assessment. Vol 14. STP 1124. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials. p 183-192.
7. McCarty LS, Mackay D. 1993. Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Environ Sci Technol 27:1719-1728.
8. Meador JP. 2006. Rationale and procedures for using the tissue-residue approach for toxicity assessment and determination of tissue, water, and sediment quality guidelines for aquatic organisms. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 12:1018-1073.
9. Meador JP,McCarty LS, Escher BI, Adams WJ. 2008. The tissue-residue approach for toxicity assessment: Concepts, issues, application, and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 10:1486-1498.
10. Rattner BA, Scheuhammer AM, Elliott JE. 2011. History of wildlife toxicology and the interpretation of contaminant concentrations in tissues. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP, editors. Environmental contaminants in biota: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francis (in press).
11. Traas TP, van Wezel AP, Hermens JLM, Zorn M, van Hattum AGM, van Leeuwen CJ. 2004. Environmental quality criteria for organic chemicals predicted from internal effect concentrations and a food web model. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2518-2527.
12. van Wezel AP, Opperhuizen A. 1995. Narcosis due to environmental pollutants in aquatic organisms: Residue-based toxicity, mechanisms, and membrane burdens. Crit Rev Toxicol 25:255-279.