Client participation in managing social work service - An unfinished quest

Social Work

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-52

  Leung, Terry T F ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Client participation; Experiential knowledge; Service management; Social work professionalism; User involvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HONG KONG; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIAL WORK;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DISABLED PERSONS; HONG KONG; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 79952458479     PISSN: 00378046     EISSN: 15456846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sw/56.1.43     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
2. Barnes, M. (1999). Users as citizens: Collective action and the local governance of welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 33, 73-90. (Pubitemid 29206099)
3. Barnes, M., Harrison, S., Mort, M., & Shardlow, P. (1999). Unequal partners: User groups and community care. Bristol, england: Polity Press.
4. Beaulaurier, R. L., & Taylor, S. H. (1999). Self-determination and consumer control: Guiding principles in the empowerment model as utilized by the disability rights movement. In W. shera & L. M. wells (Eds.), Empowerment practice in social work: Developing richer conceptual foundations (pp. 159-177). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
5. Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 53-68. (Pubitemid 38254783)
6. Brisenden, S. (1998). Independent living and the medical model of disability. In T. shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 20-27). London: Cassell.
7. Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Towards a defnition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43, 59-65.
8. Bruhn, J. G. (2001). Trust and the health of organizations. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
9. Castelloe, P., Watson, T., & White, C. (2002). Participatory change: An integrative approach to community practice. Journal of Community Practice, 10(4), 7-31.
10. Cooper, B. (2001). Constructivism in social work: Towards a participative practice viability. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 721-738.
11. Cowden, S., & Singh, G. (2007). The "user": Friend, foe or fetish? A critical exploration of user involvement in health and social care. Critical Social Policy, 27(5), 5-23. (Pubitemid 46139238)
12. Croft, S., & Beresford, P. (1996). The politics of participation. In D. Taylor (ed.), Critical social policy: A reader (pp. 175-198). London: Sage Publications.
13. Engel, M., Flosser, G., & Gensink, G. (1998). Qualityenhancement in the service society: Perspectives for social work. In G. Flosser & H. U. Otto (Eds.), Towards more democracy in social services: Models and culture of welfare (pp. 357-370). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
14. Ferguson, H. (2001). Social work, individualization and life politics. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 41-55. (Pubitemid 33602190)
15. Forbes, J., & Sashidharan, S. P. (1997). User involvement in services-Incorporation or challenge? British Journal of Social Work, 27, 481-498.
16. Gibbs, G. R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
17. Gowdy, E. A. (1994). From technical rationality to participating consciousness. Social Work, 39, 362-370.
18. Habermas, J. (1986). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
19. Harmon, M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Harris, J. (1999). State social work and social citizenship in Britain: From clientelism to consumerism. British Journal of Social Work, 29, 915-937.
21. Harrison, S., & Mort, M. (1998). Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation. Social Policy and Administration, 32, 60-70. (Pubitemid 128601630)
22. Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1998). Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 83-88. (Pubitemid 128705022)
23. Holter, M. C., Mowbray, C. T., Bellamy, C. D., MacFarlane, P., & Dukarski, J. (2004). Critical ingredients of consumer run services: Results of a national survey. Community Mental Health Journal, 40, 47-63. (Pubitemid 38992984)
24. Jun, J. S., & Rivera, M. A. (2000). Postmodernism and critical modernism. In M. A. Rivera & G. M. Woller (Eds.), Public administration in a new era: Postmodern and critical perspectives (pp. 157-178). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
25. Linhorst, D. M., Eckert, A., & Hamilton, G. (2005). Promoting participation in organizational decision making by clients with severe mental illness. Social Work, 50, 21-30.
26. Linhorst, D. M., Hamilton, G., Young, E., & Eckert, A. (2002). Opportunities and barriers to empowering people with severe mental illness through participation in treatment planning. Social Work, 47, 425-434.
27. Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1999). Disability-. A diversity model approach in human service practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28. National Association of Social Workers. (2009). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers. org/pubs/code/code.asp
29. Netting, F. E., O'Connor, M. K., & Thomas, M. L. (2005). Mixing and phasing of roles among volunteers, staff, and participants in faith-based programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 179-205. (Pubitemid 40758840)
30. Newman, J. (2001). Modernizing governance: New labour, policy and society. London: Sage Publications.
31. Parton, N. (1996). Social work, risk and "the blaming system." In N. Parton (Ed.), Social theory, social change and social work (pp. 98-114). London: Routledge.
32. Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5-27. (Pubitemid 128185341)
33. Petersen, K., & Piel, K. (1998). Client participation as an instrument of quality assurance in social work: The potential for democratization in the "new" quality consciousness. In G. Flosser & H. U. Otto (Eds.), Towards more democracy in social services: Models and culture of welfare (pp. 383-394). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
34. Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994). Management for the public domain. London: St. Martin's Press.
35. Reed, M. I. (1992). The sociology of organizations: Themes, perspectives and prospects. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
36. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
37. Social Workers Registration Board. (2009). Code of practice for registered social workers. Retrieved from http://www.swrb.org.hk/Engasp/draft- cop-e.asp
38. Spencer, M. S. (2008). A social worker's reflections on power, privilege, and oppression [Guest Editorial]. Social Work, 53, 99-101
39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Taylor, M. (1996). Between public and private: Accountability in voluntary organizations. Policy and Politics, 24, 57-72. (Pubitemid 126632720)
41. Telfair, F., & Mulvihill, B. A. (2000). Bridging science and practice: The integrated model of community-based evaluation. Journal of Community Practice, 7(3), 37-65.
42. Tower, K. D. (1994). Consumer-centered social work practice: Restoring client self-determination. Social Work, 39, 191-196.
43. Wilson, A., & Beresford, P. (2000). Anti-oppressive practice: Emancipation or appropriation? British Journal of Social Work, 30, 553-573.
44. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.