A comparison of several trilinear second-order calibration algorithms

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 93-107

  Yu, Yong Jie ^a   Wu, Hai Long ^a   Nie, Jin Fang ^a   Zhang, Shu Rong ^a   Li, Shu Fang ^a   Li, Yuan Na ^a   Zhu, Shao Hua ^a   Yu, Ru Qin ^a  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

APTLD; ATLD; PARAFAC; Second order calibration; SWATLD; Trilinear

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ALTERNATING PENALTY TRILINEAR DECOMPOSITION; ALTERNATING TRILINEAR DECOMPOSITION; ARTICLE; CHEMOMETRICS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELF WEIGHTED ALTERNATING TRILINEAR DECOMPOSITION; SIMULATION; TRILINEAR SECOND ORDER CALIBRATION ALGORITHM;

EID: 79952450062     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Smilde A.K., Wang Y.D., Kowalski B.R. Theory of medium-rank second-order calibration with restricted-Tucker models. J. Chemom. 1994, 8:21-36.
2. Smilde A.K., Tauler R., Henshaw J.M., Burgess L.W., Kowalski B.R. Multicomponent determination of chlorinated hydrocarbons using a reaction-based chemical sensor. 3. medium-rank second-order calibration with restricted tucker models. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66:3345-3351.
3. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Generalized rank annihilation factor analysis. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58:496-499.
4. Wilson B.E., Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. An improved algorithm for the generalized rank annihilation method. J. Chemom. 1989, 3:493-498.
5. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Tensorial resolution: a direct trilinear decomposition. J. Chemom. 1990, 4:29-45.
6. Li S.S., Hamilton J.C., Gemperline P.J. Generalized rank annihilation method using similarity transformations. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64:599-607.
7. Kiers H.A.L., Smilde A.K. Some theoretical results on second-order calibration methods for data with and without rank overlap. J. Chemom. 1995, 9:179-195.
8. R.A. Harshman, UCLA Working Papers in phonetics. 16 (1970).
9. Bro R. PARAFAC: tutorial and applications. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:149-171.
10. Wu H.L., Shibukawa M., Oguma K. An alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm with application to calibration of HPLC-DAD for simultaneous determination of overlapped chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:1-26.
11. Andersen C.M., Bro R. Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation-emission data. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:200-215.
12. Wu H.L., Nie J.F., Yu Y.J., Yu R.Q. Multi-way chemometric methodologies and applications: a central summary of our research work. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 650:131-142.
13. Chen Z.P., Liu Z., Cao Y.Z., Yu R.Q. Effcient way to estimate the optimum number of factors for trilinear decomposition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 444:295-307.
14. Bro R., Kiers H.A.L. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:274-286.
15. Xia A.L., Wu H.L., Zhang Y., Zhu S.H., Han Q.J., Yu R.Q. A novel efficient way to estimate the chemical rank of high-way data arrays. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 598:1-11.
16. Paatero P. Chemom. A weighted non-negative least-squares algorithm for three-way 'PARAFAC' factor analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:223-242.
17. Bro R., Andersson C.A. Improving the speed of multiway algorithms. Part II: Compression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 42:105-113.
18. Tomasi G., Bro R. A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2006, 50:1700-1734.
19. Mitchell B.C., Burdick D.S. Slowly converging PARAFAC sequences: swamps and two-factor degeneracies. J. Chemom. 1994, 8:155-168.
20. Rayens W.S., Mitchell B.C. Two-factor degeneracies and a stabilization of PARAFAC. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:173-181.
21. Fleming C.M., Kowalski B.R. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry 2000, 9737-9764. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
22. Chen Z.P., Wu H.L., Jiang J.H., Li Y., Yu R.Q. A novel trilinear decomposition algorithm for second-order linear calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 52:75-86.
23. Chen Z.P., Wu H.L., Yu R.Q. On the self-weighted alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm - the property of being insensitive to excess factors used in calculation. J. Chemom. 2001, 15:439-453.
24. Xia A.L., Wu H.L., Fang D.M., Ding Y.J., Hu L.Q., Yu R.Q. Alternating penalty trilinear decomposition algorithm for second-order calibration with application to interference-free analysis of excitation-emission matrix fluorescence data. J. Chemom. 2005, 19:65-76.
25. Tauler R., Smilde A., Kowalski B. Selectivity, local rank, three-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemom. 1995, 9:31-58.
26. Peré-Trepat E., Tauler R. Analysis of environmental samples by application of multivariate curve resolution on fused high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection mass spectrometry data. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1131:85-96.
27. Juan A., Tauler R. Multivariate curve resolution (MCR) from 2000: progress in concepts and applications. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2006, 36:163-176.
28. Linder M., Sundberg R. Second-order calibration: bilinear least-squares regression and a simple alternative. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 42:159-178.
29. Faber N.M., Ferré J., Boqué R., Kalivas J.H. Second-order bilinear calibration: the effects of vectorising the data matrices for the calibration set. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 63:107-116.
30. Olivieri A.C. On a versatile second-order multivariate calibration method based on partial least-squares and residual bilinearization: Second-order advantage and precision properties. J. Chemom. 2005, 19:253-265.
31. Escandar G.M., Faber N.(K.).M., Goicoechea H.C., Muñoz de la Peña A., Olivieri A.C., Poppi R.J. Second- and third-order multivariate calibration: data, algorithms and applications. Trends Anal. Chem. 2007, 26:752-765.
32. Hopke P.K., Paatero P., Jia H., Ross R.T., Harshman R.A. Three-way (PARAFAC) factor analysis: examination and comparison of alternative computational methods as applied to ill-conditioned data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 43:25-42.
33. Juan A., Tauler R. Comparison of three-way resolution methods for non-trilinear chemical data sets. J. Chemom. 2001, 15:749-772.
34. Faber N.(K.).M., Bro R., Hopke P.K. Recent developments in CANDECOMP/PARAFAC algorithms: a critical review. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 65:119-137.
35. García I., Sarabia L., Oritiz M.C., Aldama J.M. Three-way models and detection capability of a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of clenbuterol in several biological matrices: the 2002/657/EC European Decision. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 515:55-63.
36. Olivieri A.C. Analytical advantages of multivariate data processing. One, two, three, infinity?. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:5713-5720.
37. Gómez V., Callao M.P. Analytical applications of second-order calibration methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 627:169-183.
38. Tomasi G., Bro R. Multilinear models: iterative methods. Comprehensive chemometrics: Chemical and biochemical data analysis 2009, 411-451.
39. Olivieri A.C. Computing sensitivity and selectivity in parallel factor analysis and related multiway techniques: the need for further development in net analyte signal theory. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:4936-4946.
40. Zhang Y., Wu H.L., Ding Y.J., Xia A.L., Cui H., Yu R.Q. Simultaneous determination of cortisol and prednisolone in body fluids by using HPLC-DAD coupled with second-order calibration based on alternating trilinear decomposition. J. Chromatogr. B 2006, 840:116-123.