Three-way (PARAFAC) factor analysis: Examination and comparison of alternative computational methods as applied to ill-conditioned data

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 43, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 25-42

  Hopke, Philip K ^a   Paatero, Pentti ^b   Jia, Hong ^c   Ross, Robert T ^d   Harshman, Richard A ^e  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c Clarkson University   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

DTDMR; Factor analysis; Fluorescence spectroscopy; PARAFAC; PMF3; TPALS; Trilinear

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032575985     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00077-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Carroll J.D., Chang J.J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via N-way generalization of 'Eckart-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika. 35:1970;283-319.
2. Harshman R.A. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an 'explanatory' multi-mode factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. 16:1970;1-84.
3. R.A. Harshman, M.E. Lundy, The PARAFAC Model for Three-way Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling, Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Praeger, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 122-215.
4. R.A. Harshman, M.E. Lundy, Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model, Research methods for multimode data analysis, Praeger, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 216-284.
5. Harshman R.A., Lundy M.E. PARAFAC: Parallel Factor Analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 18:1994;39-72.
6. Kruskal J.B. Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with applications to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 18:1977;95-138.
7. Law et al., Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Chap. 6, Praeger, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 161-162.
8. Leurgans S.E., Ross R.T. Multilinear models: applications in spectroscopy. Stat. Sci. 2:1992;289-319.
9. Leurgans S.E., Ross R.T., Abel R.B. A decomposition for three-way arrays. SIAM. J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 14:1993;1064-1083.
10. Ross R.T., Leurgans S. Component resolution using multilinear models. Methods in Enzymology. 246:1995;679-700.
11. Lee J.K., Ross R.T., Thampi S., Leurgans S. Resolution of the properties of hydrogen-bonded tyrosine using a trilinear model of fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. 96:1992;9158-9162.
12. Paatero P. Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 37:1997;15-35.
13. Paatero P. A weighted non-negative least squares algorithm for three-way 'PARAFAC' factor analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 38:1997;223-242.
14. Wilson B.E., Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. An improved algorithm for the generalized rank annihilation method. J. Chemom. 3:1989;493-498.
15. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Tensorial resolution: a direct trilinear decomposition. J. Chemom. 4:1990;29-45.
16. Zeng Y., Hopke P.K. A new receptor model: a direct trilinear decomposition followed by a matrix reconstruction. J. Chemom. 6:1992;65-83.
17. Paatero P., Tapper U. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 18:1993;183-194.
18. C.L. Lawson, R.J. Hanson, Solving least squares problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
19. Bro R., De John S. A fast non-negativity constrained least-squares algorithm. J. Chemom. 11:1997;395-401.
20. P. Paatero, User's guide for the programs PMF2 and PMF3 (1997) (Unpublished).
21. J.B. Kruskal, R.A. Harshman, M.E. Lundy, How 3-MFA Data Can Cause Degenerate PARAFAC Solutions, Among Other Relationships, Multiway Data Analysis, North-Holland, 1989, pp. 115-122.
22. Rayens W., Mitchell W. Two-factor degeneracies and a stabilization of PARAFAC. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 38:1997;173-181.