ReSCA: Decision support tool for remediation planning after the Chernobyl accident

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 67-83

  Ulanovsky, A ^a   Jacob, P ^a   Fesenko, S ^b   Bogdevitch, I ^c   Kashparov, V ^d   Sanzharova, N ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Austria)

^c Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry   (Belarus)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES OF UKRAINE   (Ukraine)

^e RUSSIAN INSTITUTE OF RADIOLOGY AND AGROECOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELARUS; CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; POPULATION EXPOSURE; RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION; REMEDIATION STRATEGIES; RURAL SETTLEMENT; TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION; UKRAINE;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; RADIOACTIVITY;

POLLUTION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE;

ALGORITHMS; CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; HUMANS; RADIATION DOSAGE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79952449650     PISSN: 0301634X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-010-0344-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agricultural Radioecology (1992) In: Alexakhin RA, Korneyev NA (eds) Ecology: Moscow [in Russian]
2. RM Alexakhin 1993 Countermeasures in agricultural production as an effective means of mitigating the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident Sci Total Environ 137 9 20 10.1016/0048-9697(93)90374-F
3. BRIR (1990) Annual report of Belarussian branch of all-union institute of agricultural radiology. Gomel (in Russian)
4. G Cox NA Beresford B Alvarez-Farizo D Oughton Z Kis K Eged H Thørring J Hunt S Wright CL Barnett JM Gil BJ Howard NMJ Crout 2005 Identifying optimal agricultural strategies for a hypothetical contamination scenario using the strategy model J Environ Radioact 83 383 397 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.05.021 (Pubitemid 40910275)
5. SV Fesenko NI Sanzharova BT Wilkins AF Nisbet 1996 FORCON: local decision support system for the provision of advice in agriculture-methodology and experience of practical implementation Radiat Prot Dosim 64 1/2 157 164 (Pubitemid 26151126)
6. Fesenko SV, Alexakhin RM, Balonov MI, Bogdevich IM, Howard BJ, Kashparov BA, Sanzharova NI, Voigt G, Zhuchenka Y (2006a) Chernobyl accident. Consequences for agriculture. Nucl Eng Int 51(620):34-37
7. SV Fesenko RM Alexakhin MI Balonov IM Bogdevich BJ Howard VA Kashparov NI Sanzharova AV Panov G Voigt YM Zhuchenka 2006 Twenty years' application of agricultural countermeasures following the Chernobyl accident: lessons learned J Radiol Prot 26 351 359 10.1088/0952-4746/26/4/R01 (Pubitemid 46063926)
8. SV Fesenko RM Alexakhin MI Balonov IM Bogdevich BJ Howard VA Kashparov NI Sanzharova AV Panov G Voigt Zhuchenka YuM 2007 An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident Sci Total Environ 383 1 24 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.011 (Pubitemid 47039256)
9. AG Gillett NMJ Crout JP Absalom SM Wright SD Young BJ Howard CL Barnett SP McGrath NA Beresford G Voigt 2001 Temporal and spatial prediction of radiocaesium transfer to food products Radiat Environ Biophys 40 227 235 10.1007/s004110100107 (Pubitemid 33726393)
10. Golikov V (2003) Review of existing data on countermeasures against external exposures and prepare dosimetric data for five candidate settlements. Report for IAEA TC Project RER/9/074.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
11. VY Golikov MI Balonov P Jacob 2002 External exposure of the population living in Russian areas contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident Radiat Environ Biophys 41 185 193 (Pubitemid 36988764)
12. BJ Howard NA Beresford A Nisbet G Cox DH Oughton J Hunt B Alvarez KG Andersson A Liland G Voigt 2005 The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems J Environ Radioact 83 275 295 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.01.013 (Pubitemid 40910267)
13. IAEA (1994) Guidelines for agricultural countermeasures following an accidental release of radionuclides. IAEA Technical Report Series 363.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
14. IAEA (1997) The use of Prussian Blue to reduce radiocaesium contamination of milk and meat produced on territories affected by Chernobyl accident. Report of United Nations Project E 11. IAEA-TECDOC-926, ISSN 1011-4289.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
15. IAEA (2001) Guide on decontamination of rural settlements in the late period after radioactive contamination with long-lived radionuclides. IAEA TC Project RER/9/059. Working materials.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
16. IAEA (2006a) Environmental consequences of the chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group "Environment" (EGE).-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
17. IAEA (2006b) Countermeasure strategies in rural areas in the long term after the Chernobyl accident. IAEA TC Project RER/09/074. Working materials.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
18. IAEA (2007) Radiation Monitoring of population exposure in the late period after the Chernobyl accident. IAEA TC Project RER/09/074. Working materials.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
19. ICRP (1993) Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: part 2. J. Valentin (Ed.). ICRP Publication 67. Ann ICRP 23(3-4):1-167
20. ICRP (2006) Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public. In: Valentin J (ed) Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public and the optimization of radiological protection: broadening the process. ICRP Publication 101, Part 1. Ann ICRP 36(3):1-62
21. ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. In: Valentin J (ed) ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2-4):1-332
22. Ilyin LA, Pavlovsky OA (1988) Radiological consequences of the accident of the Chernobyl NPP and measures taken for the mitigation thereof. Atomnaya Energia 65:119-128 (in Russian)
23. Jacob P (2003) Efficiency of decontamination of rural settlements. An evaluation of field experiences of TC project RER/9/059.-Report for IAEA TC Project RER/9/974.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
24. Jacob P (2005) Recommendations on dose reduction factors for decontamination work in affected settlements. Report for IAEA TC Project RER/9/074.-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
25. P Jacob S Fesenko SK Firsakova IA Likhtarev C Schotola RM Alexakhin YM Zhuchenko L Kovgan NI Sanzharova V Ageyets 2001 Remediation strategies for rural territories contaminated by the Chernobyl accident J Environ Radioact 56 51 76 10.1016/S0265-931X(01)00047-9 (Pubitemid 32493009)
26. P Jacob S Fesenko I Bogdevich V Kashparov N Sanzharova N Grebenshikova N Isamov A Panov A Ulanovsky Y Zhuchenko 2009 Recommendations on remediation strategies for rural area affected by the Chernobyl accident Sci Total Environ 408 14 25 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.006
27. Nisbet AF, Mercer JA, Nesketh JA, Liland A, Thørring H, Bergan T, Beresford NA, Howard BJ, Hunt J, Oughton DH (2004) Datasheets on countermeasures and waste disposal options for the management of food production systems contaminated following a nuclear accident. Report NRPB-W58. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
28. AF Nisbet JA Mercer A Rantavaara F Hanninen C Vandecasteele B Carle F Hardeman KG Ioannides C Papachristodoulou C Tzialla H Ollagnon T Jullien V Pupin 2005 Achievements, difficulties and future challenges for the FARMING network J Environ Radioact 83 263 274 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.11.010 (Pubitemid 40910266)
29. D Oughton E-M Forsberg I Bay M Kaiser B Howard 2004 An ethical dimension to sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated areas J Environ Radioact 74 171 183 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.009 (Pubitemid 38452550)
30. BS Prister GP Perepelyatnikov LV Perepelyatnikova 1993 Countermeasures used in the Ukraine to produce forage and animal food products with radionuclide levels below intervention limits after the Chernobyl accident Sci Total Environ 137 183 198 10.1016/0048-9697(93)90387-L
31. Recommendations (1998) Guide on agriculture management on contaminated territories of Ukraine after Chernobyl accident. In: Prister BS, Kashparov VA, Nadtoschiy PP, Mozhar AO (eds) Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology, Kiyv (in Ukrainian)
32. Recommendations (2003) Guidelines on agricultural and industrial product in under radioactive contamination in the Republic of Belarus. In: Bogdevich IM (ed) Minsk (in Russian)
33. UNDP-UNICEF (2002) United Nations development programme and United Nations Children's Fund the Human consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Strategy for Recovery. Chernobyl Report Final 240102. New York
34. UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Report to the general assembly. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Scientific Annex C. UNSCEAR, New York
35. M Van der Perk PA Burrough G Voigt 1998 GIS-based modelling to identify regions of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia affected by residues of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident J Hazard Mater 61 85 90 10.1016/S0304-3894(98) 00111-3 (Pubitemid 28431532)
36. G Voigt K Eged BJ Howard Z Kis AF Nisbet DH Oughton B Rafferty CA Salt JT Smith H Vandenhove 2000 A wider perspective on the selection of countermeasures Radiat Prot Dosim 92 45 48