A wider perspective on the selection of countermeasures

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 92, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 45-48

  Voigt, G ^a   Eged, K ^a   Hilton, J ^b   Howard, B J ^b   Kis, Z ^a   Nisbet, A F ^c   Oughton, D H ^d   Rafferty, B ^e   Salt, C A ^f   Smith, J T ^b   Vandenhove, H ^g  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^e Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland   (Ireland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^g BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ETHICS; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RADIATION DOSE; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 0033790879     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033282     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. The relative effectiveness of agricultural countermeasures
2. The achievements of a radioecological environmental research programme arising from the collaboration of the EC and the Republics of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
3. Options for managing foodstuffs contaminated with radiocaesium and radiostrontium
4. Reducing the consumption of radiocaesium by forest mushrooms provision of 'Self-help' advice
5. Rehabilitation of living conditions in contaminated territories: The ETHOS project in Belarus
6. Ethical values in radiological protection
7. Quantitative analysis of radiocaesium retention in soils
8. Intervening for the protection of the public following a nuclear accident
9. Setting derived intervention levels for food
10. Present thoughts on the aquatic countermeasures applied to the regions of the dnieper river catchment contaminated by the 1986 Chernoby Accident