Influence of electrical fields (AC and DC) on phytoremediation of metal polluted soils with rapeseed (Brassica napus) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)

Chemosphere

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-326

  Bi, Ran ^a,b   Schlaak, Michael ^a   Siefert, Eike ^a   Lord, Richard ^b   Connolly, Helen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES EMDEN LEER   (Germany)

^b TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electro phytoremediation; Electrokinetic remediation; Heavy metal; Phytoremediation

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; BIOREMEDIATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTRODYNAMICS; HEAVY METALS; OILSEEDS; SOILS; TOBACCO;

ALTERNATING CURRENT; BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS; CONTAMINATED SOILS; ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION; METAL POLLUTED SOILS; NICOTIANA TABACUM; PHYTOREMEDIATION; TREATMENT CONDITIONS;

SOIL POLLUTION;

CADMIUM; COPPER; HEAVY METAL; LEAD; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; ZINC;

BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; BIOMASS; BIOREMEDIATION; CANOLA; ELECTRICAL METHOD; ELECTRODE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH; HARVESTING; HEAVY METAL; LABORATORY METHOD; PH; PHYTOREMEDIATION; POLLUTION EFFECT; SOIL POLLUTION; TOBACCO;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC FIELD; NONHUMAN; PH; PHYTOREMEDIATION; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT ROOT; RAPESEED; SHOOT; SOIL POLLUTION; TOBACCO;

BRASSICA NAPUS; NICOTIANA OBTUSIFOLIA; NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 79952448692     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.052     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acar Y., Alshawabkeh A. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27:2638-2646.
2. Alkorta I., Garbisu C. Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 79:273-276.
3. Bi, R., Aboughalma, H., Schlaak, M., 2007. In: 6th. Proceeding in Symposium on Electrokinetic Remediation. 12th-15th June, 2007, Vigo, Spain.
4. Bi R., Schlaak M., Siefert E., Lord R., Connolly H. Alternating current electrical field effects on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growing in hydroponic culture with and without cadmium contamination. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40:1217-1223.
5. Baker A.J.M., McGrath S.P., Sidoli C.M.D., Reeves R.D. The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1994, 11:41-49.
6. Barber S.A. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach 1995, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. second ed.
7. Blaylock M., Salt D., Dushenkov S., Zakharova O., Gussman C. Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents. Environ. Sci Technol. 1997, 31:860-865.
8. Blaylock M.J., Huang J.W. Phytoextraction of metals. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean Up the Environment 1999, 53-70. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. I. Raskin, B.D. Ensley (Eds.).
9. Bohn H.L., McNeal B.L., O'Conner G.A. Soil Chemistry 1985, Wiley, Interscience, New York.
10. Chen Z. The mechanism of electrostatic field effect on crop seeds' sprouting and growth. J. Xianning College 2006, 26(3):1-4.
11. Cho M.R., Thatte H.S., Silvia M.T., Golan D.E. Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields. J. Fed. Am. Soc. Experiment. Biol. 1999, 13:677-683.
12. Cramer N. Raps: Anbau und Verwertung 1990, Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.
13. Delgado A., Gonzalez-Caballero F., Hunter R., Koopal L., Lyklema J. Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2007, 309:194-224.
14. Dickinson N.M., Baker A.J.M., Doronila A., Laidlaw S., Reeves R.D. Phytoremediation of inorganics: realism and synergies. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2008, 11:97-114.
15. Eid N., Elshorbagy W., Larson W., Slack D. Electro-migration of nitrate in sandy soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2000, B79:133-149.
16. Glass D.J. Economic potential of phytoremediation. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean Up the Environment 2000, 15-31. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. I. Raskin, B.D. Ensley (Eds.).
17. Ghosh M., Singh S. A comparative study of cadmium phytoextraction by accumulator and weed species. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 133:365-371.
18. Goldsworthy A. Effects of electrical and electromagnetic fields on plants and related topics. Plant Electrophysiology-Theory and Methods 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. Volkov (Ed.).
19. GWRTAC (Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center), 1998. Phytoremediation. Technology Evaluation Report TE-98-01.
20. Huang J.W., Shaff J.E., Grunes D.L., Kochian L.V. Aluminum effects on calcium fluxes at root apex of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98:230-237.
21. Huang R., Sukprakarn S., Phavaphutanon L., Juntakool S., Chaikul C. Comparison of electric field treatments to hydropriming on cucumber seed germination enhancement. Kasetsart J. 2006, 40:825-834.
22. Kabata-Pendius A., Pendius H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants 1992, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.
23. Kirkham M.B. Review cadmium in plants on polluted soils: effects of soil factors, hyperaccumulations, and amendments. Geoderma 2006, 137:19-32.
24. Korshunova Y., Eide D., Clark W., Guerinot M., Pakrasi H. The IRT1 protein from Arabidopsis thaliana is a metal transporter with a broad substrate range. Plant Molecular Biol. 1999, 40:37-44.
25. Lemström S. Electricity in agriculture and horticulture. BiblioBazaar Reproduction in 1904, 2008:LLC.
26. Li F., Qu X., Wu L., et al. Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil: Fundamental Theory and Technology 2006, Chemical Industry Press. Book in Chinese.
27. Lobo Bedmar M.C., Pérez-Sanz A., Martinez-Inigo M.J., Plaza Benito A. Influence of coupled electrokinetic-phytoremediation on soil remediation. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater 2009, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. K. Reddy, C. Cameselle (Eds.).
28. Lugon-Moulin N., Zhang M., Gadani F., Rossi L., Koller D., Krauss M., Wagner G. Critical review of the science and options for reducing cadmium in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) and other plants. Adv. Agron. 2004, 83:111-180.
29. Luo Q., Wang H., Zhang X., Qian Y. Movement and transformation of nitrate in soil by non-uniform electrokinetics. Environ. Sci. 2004, 25:98-103.
30. Luo Q., Zhang X., Wang H., Qian Y. The use of non-uniform electrokinetics to enhance in situ bioremediation of phenol-contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, B121:187-194.
31. Muraji M., Asai T., Wataru T. Primary root growth rate of Zea mays seedlings grown in an alternating magnetic field of different frequencies. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1998, 44:271-273.
32. Murr L. Plant growth responses in a stimulated electric field environment. Nature 1963, 200:490-491.
33. 2+ transporters OsIRT1 and OsIRT2 in rice. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2006, 52:464-469.
34. Oke O.L. Nitrite toxicity to plants. Nature 1966, 212:528.
35. O'Conner S., Lepp W., Edwards R., Sunderland G. The combined use of electrokinetic remediation and phytoremediation to decontaminate metal-polluted soils: a laboratory-scale feasibility study. Environ. Mon. Assess. 2003, 84:141-158.
36. Pettersson O. Heavy metal ion uptake by plants from nutrient solutions with metal ion, plant species and growth period variations. Plant Soil 1976, 45:445-459.
37. Phipps R.H., Cornforth I.S. Factors effecting the toxicity of nitrite nitrogen to tomatoes. Plant Soil 1970, 33:457-466.
38. Pilon-Smits E. Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56:15-39.
39. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals Using Plants to Clean up the Environment 2000, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. I. Raskin, B.D. Ensley (Eds.).
40. Reddy K., Xu C., Chinthamreddy S. Assessment of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soils by sequential extraction analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2001, B84:279-296.
41. Robinson B.H., Leblanc M., Petit D., Brooks R.R., Kirkman J.H., Gregg P.E.H. The potential of Thlaspi caerulescens for phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Plant Soil 1998, 203:47-56.
42. Salt D.E., Prince R.C., Pickering I.J., Raskin I. Mechanisms of cadmium mobility and accumulation in Indian mustard. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109:1427-1433.
43. Teesier A., Campbell P.G.C., Bisson M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51(7):844-851.
44. Stenz H.G., Wohlwend B., Weisenseel M. Weak AC electric fields promote root growth and ER abundance of root cap cells. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1998, 44:261-269.
45. Suresh B., Ravishankar G. Phytoremediation-A novel and promising approach for environmental clean-up. Crit. Rev. Biotech. 2004, 24:97-124.
46. Toko K., Souda M., Matsuno T., Yamafuji K. Oscillations of electrical potential along a root of a higher plant. Biophys. J. 1990, 57:269-279.
47. Tsadilas C.D. Soil pH influence on cadmium uptake by tobacco in high cadmium exposure. J. Plant Nutr. 2000, 23:1167-1178.
48. Vögeli-Lange R., Wagner G.J. Subcellular localization of cadmium and cadmium-binding peptide in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92:1086-1093.
49. Plant Electrophysiology 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. A. Volkov (Ed.).
50. Wang A.S., Angle J.S., Chaney R.L., Delorme T.A., Reeves R.D. Soil pH effects on uptake of Cd and Zn by Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant and Soil 2006, 281:325-337.
51. Welch R.M., Norvell R.M. Mechanisms of cadmium uptake, translocation and deposition in plants. Cadmium in Soils and Plants 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers. M.J. McLaughlin, B.R. Singh (Eds.).
52. Yeung A.T., Hsu C., Menon R.M. Physicochemical soil-contaminant interactions during electrokinetics extraction. J. Hazard Mater 1997, 55:221-237.