The equivalence of Tucker3 and Parafac models with two components

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-26

  Kroonenberg, P M ^a   ten Berge, J M F ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Degeneracy; Parafac model; Rank three core array; Rank two core array; Tucker3 model; Two component models

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; PARAFAC MODEL; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUCKER3 MODEL;

EID: 79952441954     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tucker L.R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966, 31:279-311.
2. Harshman R.A. Foundations of the parafac procedure: models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1970, vol. 16:1-84.
3. Carroll J.D., Chang J.J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika 1970, 35:283-319.
4. Wansbeek T., Verhees J. Models for multidimensional matrices in econometrics and psychometrics. Multiway data analysis 1989, 543-552. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam. R. Coppi, S. Bolasco (Eds.).
5. Rocci R., ten Berge J.M.F. Transforming three-way arrays to maximal simplicity. Psychometrika 2002, 67:351-365.
6. ten Berge J.M.F. Kruskal's polynomial for 2×2×2 arrays and a generalization to 2×n×n arrays. Psychometrika 1991, 56:631-636.
7. Harshman R.A., Lundy M. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis 1984, 216-284. Praeger, New York. H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder, J.A. Hattie, R.P. McDonald (Eds.).
8. [8] W.P. Krijnen, The analysis of three-way arrays by constrained Parafac methods, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, 1993. (Available from http://three-mode.leidenuniv.nl).
9. Bro R., Kiers H.A.L. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. Journal of Chemometrics 2003, 17:274-286.
10. Kroonenberg P.M. Applied Multiway Data Analysis 2008, Wiley, Hoboken NJ.
11. Harshman R.A. The problem and nature of degenerate solutions or decompositions of 3-way arrays. Presentation at the Workshop on Tensor Decompositions July 2004, Palo Alto, California.
12. Krijnen W.P., Dijkstra T.K., Stegeman A. On the non-existence of optimal solutions and the occurrence of "degeneracy" in the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC model. Psychometrika 2008, 73:431-439.
13. Stegeman A. Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac explained for p×p×2 arrays of rank p+1 or higher. Psychometrika 2006, 71:483-501.
14. Osgood C.E., Luria Z. A blind analysis of a case of multiple personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1954, 49:579-591.
15. Kroonenberg P.M. Three-mode principal component analysis. Theory and Applications 1983, DSWO Press, Leiden, The Netherlands, Available from http://three-mode.leidenuniv.nl/.
16. Kroonenberg P.M. Three-mode principal components analysis of semantic differential data: the case of a triple personality. Applied Psychological Measurement 1985, 9:83-94.
17. Kojima H. Inter-battery factor analysis of parents' and children's reports of parental behaviour. Japanese Psychological Bulletin 1975, 17:33-48. (in Japanese).
18. Kroonenberg P.M., Harshman R.A., Murakami T. Analysing three-way profile data using the Parafac and Tucker3 models illustrated with views on parenting. Applied Multivariate Research 2009, 13:5-41.
19. Brouwer P., Kroonenberg P.M. Some notes on the diagonalization of the extended core matrix. Journal of Classification 1991, 8:93-98.
20. Harshman R.A., Lundy M. The parafac model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis 1984, 122-215. Praeger, New York. H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder, J.A. Hattie, R.P. McDonald (Eds.).
21. Schaeffer E.S. Children's reports of parental behavior: an inventory. Child Development 1965, 56:413-424.
22. Kiers H.A.L. Some procedures for displaying results from three-way methods. Journal of Chemometrics 2000, 14:151-170.