Degeneracy in candecomp/parafac explained for p × p × 2 arrays of rank p + 1 or higher

Psychometrika

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 483-501

  Stegeman, Alwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Candecomp; Degenerate solutions; Parafac; Three way arrays

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751214191     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-004-1266-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Apostol, T.M. (1969). Calculus (Vol. II, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
2. Carroll, J.D., & Chang, J.J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
3. Harshman, R.A. (1970). Foundations of the Parafac procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 16, 1-84.
4. Harshman, R.A. (2004). The problem and nature of degenerate solutions or decompositions of 3-way arrays. Talk at the Tensor Decompositions Workshop, July 19-23. Palo Alto, CA: AIM.
5. Harshman, R.A., & Lundy, M.E. (1984). Data preprocessing and the extended Parafac model. In H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder Jr., J.A. Hattie, & R.P. McDonald (Ed.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 216-284). New York: Praeger.
6. Ja' Ja', J. (1979). Optimal evaluation of pairs of bilinear forms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 8, 443-462.
7. Kroonenberg, P.M. (1983). Three-mode principal component analysis. Leiden: DSWO.
8. Kruskal, J.B. (1977). Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with applications to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 18, 95-138.
9. Kruskal, J.B. (1989). Rank, decomposition, and uniqueness for 3-way and W-way arrays. In Coppi R. & Bolasco, S. (Eds.). Multiway data analysis (pp. 7-18). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Kruskal, J.B., Harshman, R.A., & Lundy, M.E. (1989). How 3-MFA data can cause degenerate Parafac solutions, among other relationships. In Coppi R. & Bolasco, S. (Eds.). Multiway data analysis (pp. 115-121). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Lim, L.-H. (2005). Optimal solutions to non-negative Parafac/multilinear NMF always exist. Talk at the Workshop on Tensor Decompositions and Applications, August 29 - September 2. Marseille: CIRM, Luminy.
12. Mitchell, B.C., & Burdick, D.S. (1994). Slowly converging Parafac sequences: Swamps and two-factor degeneracies. Journal of Chemometrics, 8, 155-168.
13. Paatero, P. (1999). The multilinear engine - A table-driven least squares program for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor analysis model. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8, 854-888.
14. Paatero, P. (2000). Construction and analysis of degenerate Parafac models. Journal of Chemometrics, 14, 285-299.
15. Rayens, W.S., & Mitchell, B.C. (1997). Two-factor degeneracies and a stabilization of Parafac. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38, 173-181.
16. Sidiropoulos, N.D. (2004). Low-rank decomposition of multi-way arrays: A signal processing perspective. In Proceedings of IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel (SAM) Signal Processing Workshop, July 18-21, Sitges, Barcelona, Spain.
17. Smilde, A., Bro, R., & Geladi, P. (2004). Multi-way analysis: Applications in the chemical sciences. New York: Wiley.
18. Stegeman, A. (2005a). Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac explained for random p × q × 2 arrays. Technical Report. Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Submitted.
19. Stegeman, A. (2005b). Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac explained for 5 × 3 × 3 arrays of rank 6 or higher. Technical Report. Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
20. Ten Berge, J.M.F (1991). Kruskal's polynomial for 2 × 2 × 2 arrays and a generalization to 2 ×. n ×. n arrays. Psychometrika, 56, 631-636.
21. Ten Berge, J.M.F. (2004). Partial uniqueness in Candecomp/Parafac. Journal of Chemometrics, 18, 12-16.
22. Ten Berge, J.M.F., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1999). Simplicity of core arrays in three-way principal component analysis and the typical rank of p × q × 2 arrays. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 294, 169-179.
23. Ten Berge, J.M.E, Kiers, H.A.L., & De Leeuw, J. (1988). Explicit Candecomp/Parafac solutions for a contrived 2 × 2 × 2 array of rank three. Psychometrika, 53, 579-584.
24. Tucker, L.R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279-311.
25. Zijlstra, B.J.H., & Kiers, H.A.L. (2002). Degenerate solutions obtained from several variants of factor analysis. Journal of Chemometrics, 16, 596-605.