Variation of microfibril angle in plantation trees of cunninghamia lanceolata determined by pit apertures and X-ray diffraction

IAWA Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-87

  Yin, Yafang ^a   Song, Kunlin ^a   Liu, Bo ^a   Jiang, Xiaomei ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY   (China)

Author keywords

Cunninghamia lanceolata; Microfibril angle; Pit aperture; Variation; X ray diffraction

Indexed keywords

CUNNINGHAMIA LANCEOLATA;

EID: 79952436334     PISSN: 09281541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000044     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anagnost, S.E., R.E. Mark & R.B. Hanna. 2005. S2 orientation of microfibrils in softwood tracheids and hardwood fibres. IAWA J. 26: 325-338. (Pubitemid 41277807)
2. Andersson, S., R. Serimaa, M. Torkkeli, T. Paakkari, P. Saranpää & E. Pesonen. 2000. Microfibril angle of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] compression wood: comparison of measuring techniques. J. Wood Sci. 46: 343-349.
3. Bao, F.C. & Z.H. Jiang. 1998. Wood properties of main tree species from a plantation in China. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing.
4. Bendtsen, B. A. & J. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fibre Sci. 18: 23-38.
5. Cave, I.D. 1966. Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood. For. Prod. J. 16: 37-42.
6. Cave, I.D. & J.CF. Walker. 1994. Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle. For. Prod. J. 44: 43-48.
7. Donaldson, L.A. 1992. Within- and between-tree variation in microfibril angle in Pinus radiata. NZ. J. For. Sci. 22: 77-86.
8. Donaldson, L. A. 2008. Microfibril angle: measurement, variation and relationships - a review. IAWA J. 29: 345-386.
9. Evans, R. 1999. A variance approach to the X-ray diffractometric estimation of microfibril angle in wood. Appita J. 52: 283-294.
10. Evans, R., M. Hughes & D. Menz. 1999. Microfibril angle variation by scanning X-ray diffractometry. Appita J. 52: 363-367.
11. Evans, R., S-A. Stuart & J. van der Touw. 1996. Microfibril angle scanning of increment cores by X-ray diffractometry. Appita J. 49: 411-414.
12. Fang, S.Z., W.Z. Yang & T. Ye. 2006. Clonal and within-tree variation in microfibril angle in poplar clones. New Forests 31: 373-383.
13. Huang, C.L., N.P. Kutscha, G.J. Leaf & R.A. Megraw. 1998. Comparison of microfibril angle measurement techniques. In: B.G. Butterfield (ed.), Microfibril angle in wood: 177-204. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
14. 2 microfibril angle on longitudinal and tangential shrinkage in China-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation woods. Chinese Forestry Sci.Technol. 1 (4): 1-7.
15. Jordan, L., R. Re, D.B. Hall, A. Clark & R.F. Daniels. 2006. Variation in loblolly pine crosssectional microfibril angle with tree height and physiographic region. Wood Fibre Sci. 38: 390-398. (Pubitemid 44314313)
16. Jurbergs, K.A. 1963. Determining fiber length, fibrillar angle and springwood-summerwood ratio in slash pine. For. Sci. 9: 181-187.
17. Kretschmann, D.E., H.A. Alden & S. Verrill 1998. Variation of microfibril angle in loblolly pine: comparison of iodine crystallization and X-ray diffraction techniques. In: B.G. Butterfield (ed.), Microfibril angle in wood: 157-176. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
18. Lichtenegger, H., M. Müller, R. Wimmer & P. Fratzl. 2003. Microfibril angles inside and outside crossfields of Norway spruce tracheids. Holzforschung 57: 13-20.
19. Lichtenegger, H., A. Réitérer, S.E. Stanzl-Tschegg & P. Fratzl. 1999. Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods - a possible strategy of mechanical optimization. J. Struc. Biol. 128: 257-269.
20. Lichtenegger, H., A. Réitérer, S. Tschegg & P. Fratzl. 1998. Determination of spiral angles of elementary fibrils in the wood cell wall: comparison of small-angle X-ray scattering and wide-angle X-ray diffraction. In: B.G. Butterfield (ed.),Microfibril angle in wood: 140-156. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
21. Meylan, B.A. 1967. Measurement of microfibril angle by X-ray diffraction. For. Prod. J. 17: 51-58.
22. Naoto, W. 1986. Basis of wood application. Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House, Shanghai.
23. Peter, G.F., D.M. Benton & K. Bennett. 2003. A simple direct method for measurement of microfibril angle in single fibres using differential interference contrast microscopy. J. Pulp and Paper Sci. 29: 274-280.
24. Saranpää, P., R. Serimaa, S. Andersson, E. Pessonen,T. Suni & T. Paakkari. 1998. Variation of microfibril angle Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) - comparing X-ray diffraction and optical methods. In: B.G. Butterfield (ed.), Microfibril angle in wood: 240-252. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
25. Walker, J.CF. & B.G. Butterfield. 1995. The importance of microfibril angle for the processing industries. NZ Forestry 40: 34-40.
26. Wimmer, R. 1992. Multivariate structure property relations for pinewood. IAWA J. 13: 265-266.
27. Yamamoto, H. 1998. Generation mechanism of growth stresses in wood cell walls: Role of lignin deposition and cellulose microfibril during cell wall maturation. Wood Sci. Technol. 32: 171-182.
28. Yamashita, K., Y. Hirakawa, Y. Fujisawa & R. Nakada. 2000. Effects of microfibril angle and density on variation of modulus of elasticity of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) logs among eighteen cultivars. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 46: 510-522.
29. Zhang,B., B.H. Fei, Y. Yu & R. J. Zhao. 2007. Microfibril angle variability in Masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) using X-ray diffraction. Forestry Studies in China 9: 33-38.