Tensile trabeculae - Myth or reality?

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-7

  Sverdlova, N ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bending minimised loading; Cancellous bone anisotropy; Compressive loading of bone; Compressive trabecular structures; Finite element analysis; Functional loading of trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRUCTURE; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; GAIT; LEARNING THEORY; LOADING TEST; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; REVIEW; SITTING; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TENSILE STRENGTH; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; BONE AND BONES; HUMANS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 79952392484     PISSN: 11087161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Guo X.E. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In: Cowin SC, editor. Bone Mechanics Handbook. Boca Raton London New York Washington DC: CRC Press LLC; 2001, p. 10-1-23.
2. Rho J.Y, Ashman R.B, Turner C.H. Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and micro tensile measurements. J Biomech 1993;26:111-119.
3. Sameliin N, Köller W, Ascherl R, Gradinger R. Biomechanical testing of bone trabeculae to determine the material properties of cancellous bone tissue. Osteologie 1996;5.
4. van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. Elastic constants of the cancellous bone. In: Cowin SC, editor. Bone Mechanics Handbook. Boca Raton London New York Washington DC: CRC Press LLC; 2001. p. 15-1-24.
5. Odgaard A, Kabel J, van Rietbergen B, Dalstra M, Huiskes R. Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related. J Biomech 1997;30:487-495.
6. Martin R.B. The importance of mechanical loading in bone biology and medicine. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2007;7:48-53.
7. Turner C.H. On Wolff's law of trabecular architecture. J Biomech 1992; 25:1-9.
8. Fyhrie D.P, Schaffler MB. Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 1994;15:105-109.
9. Mosekilde L. Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures). Bone and Mineral 1990;10:13-35.
10. Hart R.T. Bone modeling and remodeling: theories and computations. In: Cowin SC, editor. Bone Mechanics Handbook. Boca Raton London New York Washington DC: CRC Press LLC; 2001. p. 31-1-42.
11. Witzel U, Preuschoft H. Finite-Element model construction for the virtual synthesis of the skulls in vertebrates: case study of Diplodocus. Anat Rec Part A 2005; 283A:391-401.
12. Marenzana M, Chenu C. Sympathetic nervous system and bone adaptive response to its mechanical environment. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2008;8:111-120.
13. Wada S, Kojo T, Wang Y, Ando H, Nakanishi E, Zhang M, Fukuyama H, Uchida Y,. Effect of loading on the development of nerve fibers around oral implants in the dog mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2001;12:219-224.
14. McNamara LM, Prendergast PJ. Bone remodelling algo-rithms incorporating both strain and microdamage stimuli. J Biomech 2007;40:1381-1391.
15. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000;405:704-706.
16. Ruimerman R, Hilbers B, van Rietbergen, Huiskes R. A theoretical framework for strain related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomech 2005;38:931-941.
17. Tsubota K, Suzuki Y, Yamada T, Hojo M, Makinouchi A, Adachi T. Computer simulation of trabecular remodeling in human proximal femur using large scale voxel FE models: Approach to understanding Wolff's law. J Bio-mech 2009;42:1088-1094.
18. Tsubota K, Adachi T, Tomita Y. Functional adaptation of cancellous bone in human proximal femur predicted by trabecular surface remodeling simulation toward uniform stress state. J Biomech 2002;35:1541-1551.
19. Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time dependent bone modeling and remodeling application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res 1990; 8:662-670.
20. Liskova M, Hert J. Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. Part 2. Periosteal and endosteal reaction of tibial diaphysis in rabbit to intermittent loading. Folia Morphologica 1971;19:310-317.
21. Sverdlova N, Witzel U. Principles of determination and verification of muscle forces in the human musculoskeletal system: muscle forces to minimise bending stress. J Biomech 2010;43:387-396.
22. Wolff J. Ueber die innere Architektur der Knochen und ihre Bedeutung fuer die Frage vom Knochenwachstum. Virchow's Archiv 1870;50:389-450.
23. Jansen M. On bone formation. Manchester: The University Press; 1920.
24. Skedros JG, Baucom SL. Mathematical analysis of trabecular 'trajectories' in apparent trajectorial structures: the unfortunate historical emphasis on the human proximal femur. J Theor Biol 2008;244:15-45.
25. Whitehouse WJ, Dyson ED. Scanning electron microscope studies of trabecular bone in the proximal end of the human femur. J Anat 1974;118:417-444.
26. Farkas A, Wilson MJ, Hayner JC. An anatomical study of the mechanics, pathology, and healing of fracture of femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1948;30A:53-69.
27. Garden RS. The structure and function of the proximal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961;43B:576-589.
28. Pauwels F. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur funktionellen Anatomie des Bewegungsapparates. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1965.
29. Frost HM. The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and non mechanical agents. Bone Mineral 1987;2:73-85.