Bone modeling and remodeling: Theories and computation

Bone Mechanics Handbook, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 31-1-31-42

  Hart, Richard T ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054949066     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Wolff, J., Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Hirschwald Verlag, Berlin, 1892.
2. Wolff, J., The Law of Bone Remodelling, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.
3. Hart, R. T., Quantitative Response of Bone to Mechanical Stress, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1983.
4. Hart, R. T., D. T. Davy, and K. G. Heiple, Mathematical modeling and numerical solutions for functionally dependent bone remodeling, Calcif. Tissue Int., 36(Suppl. 1), S104-109, 1984.
5. Roesler, H., Some historical remarks on the theory of cancellous bone structure (Wolff’s Law), Mechanical Properties of Bone, S. C. Cowin, New York, American Society of Mechanical Engineers: 27-42, 1981.
6. Frost, H. M., A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain, Clin. Orthop., 175, 286-292, 1983.
7. Carter, D. R., Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling, Calcif. Tissue Int., 36 (Suppl. 1), S19-24, 1984.
8. Huiskes, R., H. Weinans, H. J. Grootenboer, M. Dalstra, B. Fudala, and T. J. Slooff, Adaptive boneremodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis, J. Biomech., 20 (11-12), 1135-1150, 1987.
9. Cowin, S. C., Mechanical modeling of the stress adaptation process in bone, Calcif. Tissue Int., 36 (Suppl. 1), S98-103, 1984.
10. Sadegh, A. M., G. M. Luo, and S. C. Cowin, Bone ingrowth: an application of the boundary element method to bone remodeling at the implant interface, J. Biomech., 26(2), 167-182, 1993.
11. Fyhrie, D. P. and D. R. Carter, A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology, J. Orthop. Res., 4(3), 304-317, 1986.
12. Carter, D. R., D. P. Fyhrie, and R. T. Whalen, Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy, J. Biomech., 20(8), 785-794, 1987.
13. Hart, R. T., V. V. Hennebel, N. Thongpreda, W. C. Van Buskirk, and R. C. Anderson, Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study, J. Biomech., 25(3), 261-286, 1992.
14. Cowin, S. C., Deviatoric and hydrostatic mode interaction in hard and soft tissue, J. Biomech., 23(1), 11-14, 1990.
15. Burr, D. B., R. B. Martin, M. B. Schaffler, and E. L. Radin, Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage, J. Biomech., 18(3), 189-200, 1985.
16. Frost, H. M., Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff’s law: the remodeling problem, Anat. Rec., 226(4), 414-422, 1990.
17. Cowin, S. C., Bone stress adaptation models, J. Biomech. Eng., 115(4B), 528-533, 1993.
18. Lanyon, L. E., I. L. Paul, C. T. Rubin, E. L. Thrasher, R. DeLaura, R. M. Rose, and E. L. Radin, In vivo strain measurements from bone and prosthesis following total hip replacement. An experimental study in sheep, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 63(6), 989-1001, 1981.
19. Burr, D. B., M. B. Schaffler, K. H. Yang, M. Lukoschek, N. Sivaneri, J. D. Blaha, and E. L. Radin, Skeletal change in response to altered strain environments: is woven bone a response to elevated strain? Bone, 10(3), 223-233, 1989.
20. McLeod, K. J., C. T. Rubin, M. W. Otter, and Y. X. Qin, Skeletal cell stresses and bone adaptation, Am. J. Med. Sci., 316(3), 176-183, 1998.
21. Qin, Y. X., C. T. Rubin, and K. J. McLeod, Nonlinear dependence of loading intensity and cycle number in the maintenance of bone mass and morphology, J. Orthop. Res., 16(4), 482-489, 1998.
22. Rubin, C. T. and L. E. Lanyon, Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 66(3), 397-402, 1984.
23. Turner, C. H., Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli, Bone, 23(5), 399-407, 1998.
24. Treharne, R. W., Review of Wolff’s law and its proposed means of operation, Orthop. Revi., X(1), 35-47, 1981.
25. Cowin, S. C., L. Moss-Salentijn, and M. L. Moss, Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone, J. Biomech. Eng., 113(2), 191-197, 1991.
26. Cowin, S. C., S. Weinbaum, and Y. Zeng, A case for bone canaliculi as the anatomical site of strain generated potentials, J. Biomech., 28(11), 1281-1297, 1995.
27. Gjelsvik, A., Bone remodeling and piezoelectricity—I, J. Biomech., 6, 69-77, 1973.
28. Gjelsvik, A., Bone remodeling and piezoelectricity—II, J. Biomech., 6, 187-193, 1973.
29. Frost, H. A., Dynamics of bone remodeling, in Bone Biodynamics, H. A. Frost, Ed., Little, Brown, Boston, 315-333, 1964.
30. Hart, R. T. and S. P. Fritton, Introduction to finite element based simulation of functional adaptation of cancellous bone, Forma, 12, 277-299, 1997.
31. Hart, R. T., D. T. Davy, and K. G. Heiple, A computational method for stress analysis of adaptive elastic materials with a view toward applications in strain-induced bone remodeling, J. Biomech. Eng., 106(4), 342-350, 1984.
32. Frost, H. M., Intermediary Organization of the Skeleton, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1986.
33. Cowin, S. C. and W. C. Van Buskirk, Internal bone remodeling induced by a medullary pin, J. Biomech., 11(5), 269-275, 1978.
34. Cowin, S. C. and W. C. Van Buskirk, Surface bone remodeling induced by a medullary pin, J. Biomech., 12(4), 269-276, 1979.
35. Huiskes, R. and E. Y. Chao, A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade, J. Biomech., 16(6), 385-409, 1983.
36. Cook, R. D., D. S. Malkus, and M. E. Plesha, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989.
37. Hart, R. T., The finite element method, in Bone Mechanics, S. C. Cowin, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989, chap. 4, 53-74.
38. Frost, H. M., Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff’s law: the bone modeling problem, Anat. Rec., 226(4), 403-413, 1990.
39. Cowin, S. C. and D. H. Hegedus, Bone remodeling I: Theory of adaptive elasticity, J. Elasticity, 6(3), 313-326, 1976.
40. Cowin, S. C. and K. Firoozbakhsh, Bone remodeling of diaphysial surfaces under constant load: theoretical predictions, J. Biomech., 14(7), 471-484, 1981.
41. Cowin, S. C., Wolff’s law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium, J. Biomech. Eng., 108(1), 83-88, 1986.
42. Cowin, S. C. and W. C. Van Buskirk, Thermodynamic restrictions on the elastic constants of bone, J. Biomech., 19(1), 85-87, 1986.
43. Cowin, S. C., Bone remodeling of diaphyseal surfaces by torsional loads: theoretical predictions, J. Biomech., 20(11-12), 1111-1120, 1987.
44. Cowin, S. C., A. M. Sadegh, and G. M. Luo, An evolutionary Wolff’s law for trabecular architecture, J. Biomech. Eng., 114(1), 129-136, 1992.
45. Cowin, S. C., R. T. Hart, J. R. Balser, and D. H. Kohn, Functional adaptation in long bones: establishing in vivo values for surface remodeling rate coefficients, J. Biomech., 18(9), 665-684, 1985.
46. Hart, R. T., A theoretical study of the influence of bone maturation rate on surface remodeling predictions: idealized models, J. Biomech., 23(3), 241-257, 1990.
47. Hart, R. T. and A. M. Rust-Dawicki, Computational simulation of idealized long bone re-alignment, in Computer Simulations in Biomedicine, H. Power and R. T. Hart, Eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, 1995, 341-350.
48. Oden, Z. M., R. T. Hart, M. R. Forwood, and D. B. Burr, A priori prediction of functional adaptation in canine radii using a cell based mechanistic approach, Trans. 41st Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, 1995.
49. Hart, R. T., V. V. Hennebel, N. Thongpreda, and D. A. Dulitz, Computer simulation of cortical bone remodeling, in Science and Engineering on Supercomputers, E. J. Pitcher, Ed., Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, 1990, 57-66, 565-566.
50. Davy, D. T. and R. T. Hart, A Theoretical Model for Mechanically Induced Bone Remodeling, American Society of Biomechanics, Rochester, MN, 1983.
51. Hart, R. T. and D. T. Davy, Theories of bone modeling and remodeling, in Bone Mechanics, S. C. Cowin, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989, chap. 11, 253-277.
52. Martin, R. B., The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis, J. Biomech., 5(5), 447-455, 1972.
53. Oden, Z. M., Computational Prediction of Functional Adaptation in Canine Radii, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, 1994.
54. Burr, D. B., personal communication, 1994.
55. Carter, D. R., Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology, J. Biomech., 20(11-12), 1095-1109, 1987.
56. Baumgartner, A. and C. Mattheck, Computer simulation of the remodeling of trabecular bone, in Computers in Biomedicine, K. D. Held, C. A. Brebbia, and R. D. Ciskowski, Eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1991, 291-296.
57. Mattheck, C. and H. Huber-Betzer, CAO: Computer simulation of adaptive growth in bones and trees, in Computers in Biomedicine, K. D. Held, C. A. Brebbia, and R. D. Ciskowski, Eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1991, 243-252.
58. Mattheck, C., Design in Nature, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
59. Prendergast, P. J. and D. Taylor, Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation, J. Biomech., 27(8), 1067-1076, 1994.
60. McNamara, B. P., P. J. Prendergast, and D. Taylor, Prediction of bone adaptation in the ulnar-osteotomized sheep’s forelimb using an anatomical finite element model, J. Biomed. Eng., 14(3), 209-216, 1992.
61. McNamara, B. P., Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, 1995.
62. Lanyon, L. E., A. E. Goodship, C. J. Pye, and J. H. MacFie, Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling, J. Biomech., 15(3), 141-154, 1982.
63. Cowin, S. C., personal communication, 1986.
64. Cowin, S. C., The mechanical properties of cortical bone tissue, in Bone Mechanics, S. C. Cowin, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989, 97-128.
65. Harrigan, T. P. and R. W. Mann, Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthopaedic materials using a second rank tensor, J. Mater. Sci., 19, 761, 1984.
66. Harrigan, T. P., Bone Compliance and Its Effects in Human Hip Joint Lubrication, Sc.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, 1985.
67. Fritton, S. P., Computational Simulation of Trabecular Bone Adaptation, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, 1994.
68. Fritton, S. P. and R. T. Hart, Simulation of in vivo trabecular bone adaptation, 41st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, 1995.
69. Harrigan, T. P., M. Jasty, R. W. Mann, and W. H. Harris, Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone, J. Biomech., 21(4), 269-275, 1988.
70. Carter, D. R., T. E. Orr, and D. P. Fyhrie, Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture, J. Biomech., 22(3), 231-244, 1989.
71. Beaupré, G. S., T. E. Orr, and D. R. Carter, An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development, J. Orthop. Res., 8(5), 651-661, 1990.
72. Martin, R. B., Porosity and specific surface of bone, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 10(3), 179-222, 1984.
73. Jacobs, C. R., J. C. Simo, G. B. Beaupré, and D. R. Carter, Comparing an optimal efficiency assumption to a principal stress-based formulation for the simulation of anisotropic bone adaptation to mechanical loading, in Bone Structure and Remodeling, A. Odgaard and H. Weinans, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, 225-237.
74. Beaupré, G. S., T. E. Orr, and D. R. Carter, An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation, J. Orthop. Res., 8(5), 662-670, 1990.
75. Cowin, S. C., The false premise of Wolff’s law, Forma, 12, 247-262, 1997.
76. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer, The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models, J. Biomech., 25(12), 1425-1441, 1992.
77. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer, Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling, J. Orthop. Res., 10(6), 845-853, 1992.
78. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer, Convergence and uniqueness of adaptive bone remodeling, Transactions of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, 1989.
79. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer, Numerical comparisons of strain-adaptive boneremodeling theories, Abstracts of the 1st World Congress on Biomechanics, La Jolla, 1990.
80. Carter, D. R. and W. C. Hayes, The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 59(7), 954-962, 1977.
81. Harrigan, T. P. and J. J. Hamilton, An analytical and numerical study of the stability of bone remodelling theories: dependence on microstructural stimulus [published erratum appears in J. Biomech., 26(3), 3656, 1993], J. Biomech., 25(5), 477-488, 1992.
82. Cowin, S. C., Y. P. Arramon, G. M. Luo, and A. M. Sadegh, Chaos in the discrete-time algorithm for bone-density remodeling rate equations, J. Biomech., 26(9), 1077-1089, 1993.
83. Jacobs, C. R., M. E. Levenston, G. S. Beaupré, J. C. Simo, and D. R. Carter, Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach, J. Biomech., 28(4), 449-459, 1995.
84. Jog, C. S. and R. B. Haber, Stability of Finite Element Models for Distributed-Parameter Optimization and Topology Design, TAM Report No. 758, UIL-ENG-94-6014, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1994.
85. Sigmund, O., Design of Material Structures Using Topology Optimization, Reports 69, Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 1994.
86. Jacobs, C. R., M. E. Levenston, G. B. Beaupré, and J. C. Simo, A new implementation of finite element-based remodeling, G. N. P. J. Middleton, and K. R. Williams, Eds., in Recent Advances in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Books and Journals International, Swansea, 1992.
87. Mullender, M. G., R. Huiskes, and H. Weinans, A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self-organizational control process, J. Biomech., 27(11), 1389-1394, 1994.
88. Mullender, M. G. and R. Huiskes, Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff’s law, J. Orthop. Res., 13(4), 503-512, 1995.
89. Smith, T. S., R. B. Martin, M. Hubbard, and B. K. Bay, Surface remodeling of trabecular bone using a tissue level model, J. Orthop. Res., 15(4), 593-600, 1997.
90. Luo, G., S. C. Cowin, A. M. Sadegh, and Y. P. Arramon, Implementation of strain rate as a bone remodeling stimulus, J. Biomech. Eng., 117(3), 329-338, 1995.
91. Currey, J. D., The validation of algorithms used to explain adaptive remodelling in bone, in Bone Structure and Remodelling, A. Odgaard and H. Weinans, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, 9-13.
92. Oden, Z. M. and R. T. Hart, 1995, Correlation between mechanical parameters that represent bone’s mechanical milieu and control functional adaptation, in Bone Structure and Remodeling: Recent Advances in Human Biology, vol. 2, A. Odgaard and H. Weinans, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, ix, 257.
93. Martin, R. B., The usefulness of mathematical models for bone remodeling, Yearbook Phys. Anthro-pol, 28, 227-236, 1985.
94. Huiskes, R., The law of adaptive bone remodelling: a case for crying Newton? in Bone Structure and Remodelling, A. Odgaard and H. Weinans, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, 15-24.
95. Frost, H. M., Introduction to a New Skeletal Physiology, Pajaro Group, Pueblo, CO, 1995.