Looking ahead: Planning for the first human intracortical visual prosthesis by using pilot data from focus groups of potential users

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 139-147

  Lane, Frank John ^a   Huyck, Margaret Hellie ^a   Troyk, Philip ^b  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

focus groups; Intracortical visual prosthesis; PAR

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESEARCH DESIGN; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PROSTHESIS; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 79952375624     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.514381     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fischman J. Merging man and machine: The bionic age. Natl Geogr 2010;34-53.
2. Belluck P. Technology helps blind. 2009. Sun-Sentinal (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). Electronic citation. Retrieved from www.allbusiness.com
3. Troyk PR, Huyck MH, Lane FJ. Responses of potential users to the intracortical visual prosthesis: Focus group pilot data. Poster presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Opthamology (Session 4228-D761). Fort Lauderdale, FL., May 3-7; 2009.
4. Troyk P, Bak M, Berg J, Bradley D, Cogan S, Erickson R, Kufta C, McCreeryD, SchmidtE, TowleV.Amodel for intra-cortical visual prosthesis research. Artif Organs 2003;27:1005-1015. (Pubitemid 37414239)
5. Brindley GS, Lewin WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1968;196:479-493.
6. Brindley GS, Donaldson PE, Falconer MA, Rushton DN. The extent of the region of occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field. J Physiol (Lond) 1972;225:57-58.
7. Brindley GS. The variability of the human striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1972;225:1-3.
8. Brindley GS. Sensory effects of electrical stimulation of the visual and paravisual cortex in man. In: Jung R, editor. Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1973. pp 583-594.
9. Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol (Lond) 1974;243:553-576.
10. Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artificial vision for the blind: Electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 1974;183:440-444.
11. Dobelle WH,Mladejovsky MG, Evans JR, Roberts TS, Girvin JP. 'Braille' reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature 1976;259:111-112.
12. Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J 2000;46:3-9.
13. Pollen DA. Some perceptual effects of electrical stimulation of the visual cortex in man. In: Tower DB, editor. The nervous system. Vol. 2: The clinical neurosciences. New York: Raven Press; 1975. pp. 519-528.
14. Bartlett JR, Doty RW. An exploration of the ability of macaques to detect microstimulation of the striate cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp 1980;40:713-728.
15. Schmidt EM, Bak MJ, Hambrecht FT, Kufta CV, O'Rourke DK, Vallabhanath P. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 1996;119:507-522. (Pubitemid 26149365)
16. Peterson W. Role of persons with a disability in the design process. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:87-96. (Pubitemid 351631452)
17. Rubin S, Roessler RT. Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process. 6th ed, Austin, TX: ProEd; 2008.
18. Balcazar FE, Keys CB, Kaplan DL, Suarez-Balcazar Y. Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Can J Rehabil 2006;12:105-111.
19. Corbet C. Consumer involvement in research: Inclusion and impact. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG, editors. Spinal cord injury: Clinical outcomes from the model systems. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers Inc.; 1995. pp 213-233.
20. Tate DG, Pledger C. An integrative framework of disability: New directions for research. Am Psychol 2003;58:289-295. (Pubitemid 37395210)
21. White G. Consumer participation in disability research. Rehabil Psychol 2002;47:438-446.
22. Kurson R. Crashing through: A true story of risk, adventure, and the man who dared to see. Minneapolis: Scribe Publications; 2008.
23. National Institutes of Health. Regulations and ethical guidelines: Directives for Human Experimentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2009.
24. Drane JF. Competency to give an informed consent: A model for making clinical assessments. In: Boetzkes EA, Waluchow WJ, editors. Readings in healthcare ethics. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press; 2000.
25. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
26. Charlton J. Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
27. Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993;5:36-45.
28. Scherer MJ. What we know about women's technology use, avoidance, and abandonment. Women Therapy 1993;14:117-132.
29. Wessels RD, Willems CG, De White LP. How to select a method to evaluate usability of assistive devices. J Rehabil Sci 1996;9:53-57. (Pubitemid 26256919)
30. Fawcett SB. Some values guiding community research and action. J Appl Behav Anal 1991;24:612-636.
31. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
32. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
33. White RW. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychol Rev 1959;66:297-333.
34. Maslow A. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 1943;50:370-396.
35. Maslow A. The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Harper; 1971.
36. Nohria N, Lawrence P, Wilson E. Driven: How human nature shapes our choices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001.
37. Institute for Management Excellence. The nine basic human needs. Online newsletter. 2001. Electronic citation. http:www. itstime.com/print/june97p.htm. Last accessed 26 June 2009.
38. Smart J. Disability, society and the individual. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 2001.
39. Shapiro JP. No pity. New York: Random House; 1994.
40. Behnke SH, Winick BJ, Perez AM. The essentials of Florida mental health law. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.; 2000.
41. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: Author URL; 2002.
42. Marrone J, Hoff D, Helm DT. Person centered planning for the millennium: We're old enough to remember when PCP was just a drug. J Vocat Rehabil 1997;8:285-297. (Pubitemid 27289152)
43. Hoff D. WIA and one-stop centers: Opportunities and issues for the disability community. Institute brief 10 no 1, Institute for Community Inclusion. Boston, MA; 2000.