Consumer participation in disability research: The golden rule as a guide for ethical practice

Rehabilitation Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 438-446

  White, Glen W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECUBITUS; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; STANDARD; SYPHILIS;

EID: 0038079774     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.47.4.438     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(Suppl. 2), S15-S20.
3. Andresen, E. M., Lollar, D., & Meyers, A. R. (2000). Disability outcomes research: Why this supplement; on this topic; at this time? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(Suppl. 2), S1-S4.
4. Boyce, W. (1998). Participation of disability advocates in research partnerships with health professionals. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 85-93.
5. Butler, B. N. (1973). Chairman, Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
6. Campbell, M., Copeland, B., & Tate, B. (1998). Taking the standpoint of people with disabilities in research: Experiences with participation. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 95-104.
7. Curran, W. J. (1973). Law-medicine notes: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. New England Journal of Medicine, 289, 730-731.
8. DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 435-466.
9. Dunn, G. (1989). Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. F. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to special issue. Human Relations, 46, 121-142.
11. Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 612-636.
12. Gamble, V. N. (1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1773-1778.
13. Gordon, W. A. (1995). PAR: A realistic strategy for medical rehabilitation research? New York: Mount Sinai Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on the Community Integration of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury.
14. Harris, Y., Gorelick, P. B., Samuels, P., & Bempong, I. (1996). Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. Journal of the National Medical Association, 88, 630-634.
15. Krogh, K. (1998a). A conceptual framework of community partnerships: Perspectives of people with disabilities on power, beliefs, and values. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 123-134.
16. Krogh, K. (Ed.). (1998b). Community partnerships: Research and action on disability issues [Special issue]. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12(2).
17. Meyers, A. R., & Andresen, E. M. (2000). Enabling our instruments: Accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(Suppl. 2), S5-S9.
18. National Research Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-348.
19. Santelli, B., Singer, G. H. S., DiVenere, N., Ginsberg, C., & Powers, L. E. (1998). Participatory action research: Reflections on critical incidents in a PAR project. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 211-222.
20. Schuman, S. H., Olansky, S., Rivers, E., Smith, C. A., & Rambo, D. S. (1955). Untreated syphilis in the male Negro: Background and current status of patients in the Tuskegee Study. Journal of Chronic Disease, 2, 543-558.
21. Turnbull, A. P., Friesen, B. J., & Ramirez, C. (1998). Participatory action research as a model for conducting family research. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 178-188.
22. White, G. W., Mathews, R. M., & Fawcett, S. B. (1989). Reducing risk of pressure sores: Effects of watch prompts and alarm avoidance on wheelchair push-ups. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 287-295.
23. White, G. W., Nary, D. E., & Froehlich, A. K. (2001). Consumers as collaborators in research and action. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 21, 15-34.
24. Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participator), action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
26. Yeich, S., & Levine, R. (1992). Participatory research's contribution to a conceptualization of empowerment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1894-1908.