Comparison of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A single-center study

Urology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 730-734

  Bird, Vincent G ^a   Leveillee, Raymond J ^a   Eldefrawy, Ahmed ^a   Bracho, Jorge ^a   Aziz, Mohammed S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLAVIEN DINDO; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTIC ASSISSTED LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 79952362056     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.540     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. C.G. Eden Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results URL Europe 52 2007 983 989 (Pubitemid 47332059)
2. R.G. Notley, and J.M. Beaugie The long-term follow-up of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis Br J Urol 45 1973 464 467
3. L. Persky, J.R. Krause, and R.L. Boltuch Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty J Urol 118 1977 162 165
4. L.R. Kavoussi, and C.A. Peters Laparoscopic pyeloplasty J Urol 150 1993 1891 1894 (Pubitemid 24350826)
5. W.W. Schuessler, M.T. Grune, and L.V. Tecuanhuey Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty J Urol 150 1993 1795 1799 (Pubitemid 24350801)
6. R.V. Clayman, L.R. Kavoussi, and R.S. Figenshau Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: initial clinical case report J Laparoendosc Surg 1 1991 343 349
7. I.S. Gill, R.V. Clayman, and E.M. McDougall Advances in urological laparoscopy J Urol 154 1995 1275 1294
8. J. Rassweiler, T. Frede, and T.O. Henkel Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach Eur Urol 33 1998 489 496 (Pubitemid 28251998)
9. H. Miyake, G. Kawabata, and A. Gotoh Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators Int J Urol 9 2002 329 333 (Pubitemid 34779718)
10. G.T. Sung, I.S. Gill, and T.H. Hsu Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study Urology 53 1999 1099 1103 (Pubitemid 29264735)
11. B.V. Yanke, C.D. Lallas, and C. Pagnani Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technical considerations and outcomes J Endourol 22 2008 1291 1296
12. M.A. El-Shazly, D.A. Moon, and C.G. Eden Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature J Endourol 21 2007 673 678 (Pubitemid 47311404)
13. M.T. Gettman, R. Peschel, and R. Neurer A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci Robotic System versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results Eur Urol 42 2002 457 458
14. R.W. Graham, S.D. Graham, and G.B. Bokinsky Urological upper tract surgery with the Da Vinci Robot System, pyeloplasty J Urol 165 2001 V74
15. B. Guilloneau, C. Jayet, and O. Cappele Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty J Urol 165 2001 V75
16. J.D. Brooks, L.R. Kavoussi, and G.M. Preminger Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction Urology 46 1995 791 795
17. D. Canes, A. Berger, and M.T. Gettman Minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction Urol Clin North Am 35 2008 425 439
18. J. Binder, J. Jones, and W. Bentas Robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology: radical prostatectomy and reconstructive peritoneal interventions (Ger) Urologe A 41 2002 144 149
19. M.T. Gettman, R. Neururer, and G. Bartsch Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system Urology 60 2002 509 513 (Pubitemid 35292186)
20. U. Boylu, M. Oommen, and B.R. Lee Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience J Urol 181 2009 1751 1755
21. K. Ferhi, M. Roupret, and J. Rode Promising functional outcomes obtained with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A single center experience J Endourol 23 2009 959 963
22. J.H. Kaouk, J. Hafron, and S. Parekattil Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results J Endourol 22 2009 2153 2159
23. A. Hemal, S. Mishra, and S. Mukharjee Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair Int J Urol 15 2008 744 746
24. N.P. Gupta, R. Nayyer, and A.K. Hemal Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience BJU Int 2009 980 983
25. Schwentner C. Pelzer, and R. Nuerurer Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5 year experience of one centre BJU Int 100 2007 880 885
26. R. Munver, R.E. Sosa, and J.J. Del Pizzo Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: history, evolution, and future J Endourol 18 2004 748 755 (Pubitemid 39441765)
27. E.S. Hyams, P.W. Mufarrij, and M.D. Stifelman Robotic renal and upper tract reconstruction Curr Opin Urol 18 2008 557
28. A.J. Ball, A. Lopez-Pujals, R.J. Leveillee, and V.G. Bird Operative costs comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. daVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: initial analysis J Endourol 17 Suppl 1 2003 A223