A comparison and user-based evaluation of models of textual information structure in the context of cancer risk assessment

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Guo, Yufan ^a   Korhonen, Anna ^a   Liakata, Maria ^c   Silins, Ilona ^b   Hogberg, Johan ^b   Stenius, Ulla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; AUTOMATIC CLASSIFIERS; AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; AUTOMATIC SUMMARIZATION; BIOMEDICAL TEXT MININGS; CANCER RISK ASSESSMENTS; INFORMATION STRUCTURES; USER-BASED EVALUATIONS;

AUTOMATION; DATA MINING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ABSTRACTING;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA MINING; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA MINING; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79952338946     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-69     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. PubMed. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
2. Cohen A, Hersh W. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2005, 6:57-71. 10.1093/bib/6.1.57, 15826357.
3. Ananiadou S, Mcnaught J. Text Mining for Biology And Biomedicine 2005, Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, Inc.
4. Hunter L, Cohen KB. Biomedical Language Processing: What's Beyond PubMed?. Mol Cell 2006, 21(5):589-594. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.012, 1702322, 16507357.
5. Ananiadou S, Kell D, Tsujii J. Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology. Trends in Biotechnology 2006, 24(12):571-579. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.002, 17045684.
6. Chapman W, Cohen KB. Current issues in biomedical text mining and natural language processing. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2009, 5(42):757-759.
7. Zweigenbaum P, Demner-Fushman D, Yu H, Cohen KB. Frontiers of biomedical text mining: current progress. Brief Bioinform 2007, 8(5):358-375. 10.1093/bib/bbm045, 2516302, 17977867.
8. Karamanis N, Seal R, Lewin I, Mcquilton P, Vlachos A, Gasperin C, Drysdale R, Briscoe T. Natural Language Processing in aid of FlyBase curators. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:193. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-193, 2375127, 18410678.
9. Demaine J, Martin J, Wei L, de Bruijn B. LitMiner: integration of library services within a bio-informatics application. Biomedical Digital Libraries 2006, 3:11. 10.1186/1742-5581-3-11, 1626482, 17052341.
10. Dowell KG, McAndrews-Hill MS, Hill D, Drabkin H, Blake J. Integrating text mining into the MGI biocuration workflow. Database 2009, 2009:bap019. 10.1093/database/bap019, 2797454, 20157492.
11. Shah P, Jensen L, Boue S, Bork P. Extraction of transcript diversity from scientific literature. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1:e10. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010010, 1183516, 16103899.
12. Horn F, Lau AL, Cohen FE. Automated extraction of mutation data from the literature: application of MuteXt to G protein-coupled receptors and nuclear hormone receptors. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(4):557-568. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg449, 14990452.
13. Zweigenbaum P, Demner-Fushman D, Yu H, Cohen KB. New frontiers in biomedical text mining. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2007, 205-208.
14. Müller HM, Kenny EE, Sternberg PW. Textpresso: An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval and Extraction System for Biological Literature. PLoS Biol 2004, 2(11):e309. 517822, 15383839.
15. Cohen KB, Yu H, Bourne PE, Hirschman L. Translating Biology:text mining tools that work. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2008, 551-555. 2934913, 20827444.
16. Teufel S, Moens M. Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics 2002, 28:409-445.
17. Tbahriti I, Chichester C, Lisacek F, Ruch P. Using argumentation to retrieve articles with similar citations. Int J Med Inform 2006, 75(6):488-495. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.007, 16165395.
18. Ruch P, Boyer C, Chichester C, Tbahriti I, Geissbuhler A, Fabry P, Gobeill J, Pillet V, Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Lovis C, Veuthey AL. Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76(2-3):195-200. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.002, 16815739.
19. Mizuta Y, Korhonen A, Mullen T, Collier N. Zone Analysis in Biology Articles as a Basis for Information Extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and Its Applications 2006, 75(6):468-487.
20. Lin J, Karakos D, Demner-Fushman D, Khudanpur S. Generative content models for structural analysis of medical abstracts. Proceedings of BioNLP-06 2006, 65-72. New York, USA.
21. Hirohata K, Okazaki N, Ananiadou S, Ishizuka M. Identifying Sections in Scientific Abstracts using Conditional Random Fields. Proceedings of 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing 2008, 381-388.
22. Teufel S, Siddharthan A, Batchelor C. Towards Domain-Independent Argumentative Zoning: Evidence from Chemistry and Computational Linguistics. Proceedings of EMNLP 2009, 1493-1502.
23. Shatkay H, Pan F, Rzhetsky A, Wilbur WJ. Multi-dimensional classification of biomedical text: Toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(18):2086-2093. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn381, 2530883, 18718948.
24. Lin RTK, Dai HJ, Bow YY, Chiu JLT, Tsai RTH. Using conditional random fields for result identification in biomedical abstracts. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 2009, 16(4):339-352.
25. Liakata M, Teufel S, Siddharthan A, Batchelor C. Corpora for the conceptualisation and zoning of scientific papers. Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10). Edited by Chair) 2010, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Choukri NCC, Maegaard K, Mariani B, Odijk J, Piperidis J, Rosner S, Tapias M, Valletta D.
26. Mullen T, Mizuta Y, Collier N. A baseline feature set for learning rhetorical zones using full articles in the biomedical domain. Natural language processing and text mining 2005, 7:52-58.
27. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online. , http://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/databases_medline.html
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment 2005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)., http://www.epa.gov/cancerguidelines/
29. Korhonen A, Sun L, Silins I, Stenius U. The First Step in the Development of Text Mining Technology for Cancer Risk Assessment: Identifying and Organizing Scientific Evidence in Risk Assessment Literature. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:303. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-303, 2759963, 19772619.
30. Lin J. Is Searching Full Text More Effective Than Searching Abstracts?. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:46. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-46, 2695361, 19192280.
31. Liakata M, Q C, Soldatova L. Semantic Annotation of Papers: Interface & Enrichment Tool (SAPIENT). Proceedings of BioNLP-09 2009, 193-200. Boulder, Colorado.
32. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960, 20:37-46.
33. Siegel S, Castellan NJJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill, 2.
34. Kang D, Lu J, Xu B, Wang P, Li Y. A Framework of Checking Subsumption Relations Between Composite Concepts in Different Ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Springer Verlag 2005, 3681:953-959.
35. Merity S, Murphy T, Curran JR. Accurate Argumentative Zoning with Maximum Entropy models. Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries 2009, 19-26. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. Sun L, Korhonen A. Improving Verb Clustering with Automatically Acquired Selectional Preference. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2009, 638-647.
37. Curran JR, Clark S, Bos J. Linguistically Motivated Large-Scale NLP with C&C and Boxer. Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Demonstrations Session 2007, 33-36.
38. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java Implementations. , http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/
39. CRF++: Yet Another CRF toolkit. , http://crfpp.sourceforge.net/
40. Mitchell J, Lapata M, Demberg V, Keller F. Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Difficulty: An Integrated Measure. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2010, 196-206.
41. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1945, 1(6):80-83.
42. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1947, 18:50-60.
43. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174. 10.2307/2529310, 843571.