|
Volumn 258, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 531-537
|
Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANCER GRADING;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY;
ENDOSCOPY;
FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN TISSUE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NASOPHARYNX CARCINOMA;
NASOPHARYNX TUMOR;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BIOPSY;
ENDOSCOPY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NASOPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 79952328642
PISSN: 00338419
EISSN: 15271315
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101241 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (98)
|
References (7)
|