Pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-185

  Peters, Craig A ^a  

^a CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; CAUTERIZATION; ENDOSCOPE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTESTINE INJURY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; PYELOTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICS; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URETEROURETEROSTOMY;

CHILD; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79952304964     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0597     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, et al. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol 2007;177:2306-2310. (Pubitemid 46726434)
2. Ginger VA, Lendvay TS. Intraoperative ultrasound: Application in pediatric pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;73:377-379.
3. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: A 5-year experience. J Urol 2007;178:2137-2141. (Pubitemid 47538628)
4. Passerotti CC, Nguyen HT, Retik AB, Peters CA. Patterns and predictors of laparoscopic complications in pediatric urology: The role of ongoing surgical volume and access techniques. J Urol 2008;180:681-685.
5. Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1995;153:1962-1965.
6. Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: Hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis - is there a difference? J Urol 2007;178:1483-1486.
7. Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009;56:848-857.
8. Freilich DA, Penna FJ, Nelson CP, et al. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey. J Urol 2010;183:704-708.
9. Passerotti CC, Nguyen HT, Eisner BH, et al. Laparoscopic reoperative pediatric pyeloplasty with robotic assistance. J Endourol 2007;21:1137-1140.
10. Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: The retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 2004;171:2629-2631. (Pubitemid 38623715)
11. Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005;174:1440-1442. (Pubitemid 41318755)
12. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 2006;175:683-687. (Pubitemid 43067420)
13. Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, et al. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant - lessons learned. J Urol 2006;176:2237-2240. (Pubitemid 44633192)
14. Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, et al. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 2006;67:599-602. (Pubitemid 43343551)
15. Freilich DA, Nguyen HT, Borer J, et al. Concurrent management of bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children using robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Int Braz J Urol 2008;34:198-205.
16. Chan KW, Lee KH, Tam YH, Sihoe JD. Early experience of robotic-assisted reconstructive operations in pediatric urology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20:379-382.