Linking air quality and watershed models for environmental assessments: Analysis of the effects of model-specific precipitation estimates on calculated water flux

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1722-1737

  Golden, Heather E ^a   Knightes, Christopher D ^a   Cooter, Ellen J ^a   Dennis, Robin L ^a   Gilliam, Robert C ^a   Foley, Kristen M ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality modeling; Model linkage; Precipitation; Runoff simulations; Watershed modeling

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC CONTAMINANTS; ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH; BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODELS; COMMUNITY MULTI-SCALE AIR QUALITY MODELS; DATA SETS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; FATE AND TRANSPORT; GRID-BASED WATERSHEDS; MESOSCALE MODEL; MODEL ALGORITHMS; MULTI SENSOR; MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS; PENNSYLVANIA; PRECIPITATION; RUNOFF SIMULATIONS; SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS; STREAM GAGES; TIME-PERIODS; WATER BALANCE; WATER FLUX; WATERSHED MODELING; WATERSHED MODELS; WET DEPOSITION;

AIR QUALITY; ANALYTICAL GEOCHEMISTRY; CLIMATOLOGY; GAGES; LANDFORMS; MERCURY (METAL); RAIN; RAIN GAGES; RUNOFF; WATERSHEDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RAINGAUGE; RUNOFF; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WATER BUDGET; WATERSHED; WET DEPOSITION;

EID: 79952285800     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andréassian V., Perrin C., Michel C., Iolanda U.-S., Lavabre J. Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 2001, 250:206-223.
2. Beven K.J., Hornberger G. Assessing the effect of spatial pattern of precipitation in modeling stream flow hydrographs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1982, 18(5):823-829.
3. Bhaduri B., Harbor J., Engel B., Grove M. Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS model. Environmental Management 2000, 26(6):643-658.
4. Boyer E., Goodale C., Jaworski N., Howarth R. Anthropogenic sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the Northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 2002, 57/58:137-169.
5. Bullock O.R., Brehme K.A. Atmospheric mercury simulation using CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results. Atmospheric Environment 2002, 36:2135-2146.
6. Byun D.W., Schere K.L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Review 2006, 59:51-77.
7. Carpenter T.M., Georgakakos K.P. Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298(1-4):202-221.
8. Castro M., Driscoll C.T., Jordan T., Ray W.G., Boynton W., Seitzinger S., Styles R.V., Cable J.E. Contribution of atmospheric deposition to the total nitrogen loads to thirty-four estuaries on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. Nitrogen Loading in Coastal Water Bodies: An Atmospheric Perspective 2001, 77-106. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. R. Valigura, R.B. Alexander, M. Castro, T. Meyers, H.W. Paerl, P.E. Stacey, R.E. Turner (Eds.).
9. 3-N loads predictions. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 207-222.
10. Dai T., Ambrose R.B., Alvi K., Wool T., Manguerra H., Choski M., Yang H., Kraemer S. Characterizing spatial and temporal dynamics: development of a grid-based watershed mercury loading model. Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges, Williamsburg, Virginia 19-22 July 2005, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. G.E. Moglen (Ed.).
11. Daly C., Gibson W.P., Taylor G.H., Johnson G.L., Pasteris P. A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Climate Research 2002, 22:99-113.
12. Daly C., Neilson R.P., Phillips D.L. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1994, 33:140-158.
13. Endreny T.A., Higgins M. Adding radar rainfall and calibration to the TR-20 Watershed Model to improve dam removal and flood analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2008, 314-317.
14. Evans C. Modelling the effects of climate change on an acidic upland stream. Biogeochemistry 2005, 74:21-46. 10.1007/s10533-004-0154-6.
15. Faurès J.-M., Goodrich D.C., Woolhiser D.A., Sorooshian S. Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology 1995, 173(1-4):309-326.
16. Fekete B.M., Vörösmarty C.J., Roads J.O., Willmott C.J. Uncertainties in precipitation and their impacts on runoff estimates. Journal of Climate 2004, 17(2):294-304.
17. Fenicia F., Savenije H.H.G., Matgen P., Pfister L. A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research 2007, 43.
18. Fulton R.A., Breidenbach J.P., Seo D.J., Miller D.A., O'Bannon T. The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Weather Forecasting 1998, 13:377-395.
19. Garen D.C., Moore D.S. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: uses, abuses, and future directions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2005, 41(2):377-388.
20. Gilliam R.C., Hogrefe C., Rao S.T. New methods for evaluating meteorological models used in air quality applications. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40(26):5073-5086.
21. Gourley J.J., Vieux B.E. A method for evaluating the accuracy of quantitative precipitation estimates from a hydrologic modeling perspective. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2005, 6(2):115-133.
22. Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J., Stauffer, D.R., 1995. A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Technical note: NCAR/TN-398, available at. (accessed 07.05.10.). http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/doc1.html.
23. Haith D.A., Mandel R., Wu R.S. GWLF: Generalized Watershed Loading Functions, Version 2.0, User's Manual 1992, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Ithaca, New York.
24. Hammerschmidt C.R., Fitzgerald W.F. Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition. Environmental Science and Technology 2006, 40(24):7764-7770.
25. Hamon W.R. Estimating potential evaportranspiration. Journal of the Hydraulic Division 1961, 87(HY3):107-120. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
26. Hossain F., Anagnostou E.N., Dinku T., Borga M. Hydrological model sensitivity to parameter and radar rainfall estimation uncertainty. Hydrological Processes 2004, 18:3277-3291.
27. Julian J.P., doyle M.W., Stanley E.H. Empirical modeling of light availability in rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research 2008, 113:G03022. 10.1029/2007JG000601.
28. Kalin L., Hantush M.M. Hydrologic modeling of an Eastern Pennsylvania watershed with NEXRAD and rain gauge data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2006, 11(6):555-569.
29. Kalinga O.A., Gan T.Y. Semi-distributed modelling of basin hydrology with radar and gauged precipitation. Hydrological Processes 2006, 20(17):3725-3746.
30. Kim B.S., Kim B.K., Kim H.S. Flood simulation using the gauge-adjusted radar rainfall and physics-based distributed hydrologic model. Hydrological Processes 2008, 22(22):4400-4414.
31. Kim N.W., Lee J. Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation. Hydrological Processes 2008, 22(25):4936-4948.
32. Koren V.I., Finnerty B.D., Schaake J.C., Smith M.B., Seo D.J., Duan Q.Y. Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation. Journal of Hydrology 1999, 217(3-4):285-302.
33. Kyriakidis P.C., Miller N.L., Kim J. Uncertainty propagation of regional climate model precipitation forecasts to hydrologic impact assessment. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2001, 2(2):140-160.
34. Liang X., Guo J., Leung L.R. Assessment of the effects of spatial resolutions on daily water flux simulations. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:287-310.
35. Liang X., Lettenmaier D.P., Wood E.F., Burges S.J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and Energy fluxes for GSMs. Journal of Geophysical Research 1994, 99(D7)(14):415-528.
36. Lin Y., Mitchell K.E. The NCEP Stage II/IV Hourly Precipitation Analysis: Development and Applications 2005, San Diego, California, Available at, (accessed 16.10.08.). http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/ylin/pcpanl/refs/stage2-4.19hydro.pdf, Preprints, t.C.o.H., American Meteorological Society (Ed.).
37. Liu Y., Freer J., Beven K., Matgen P. Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 367(1-2):93-103.
38. Mandapaka P.V., Krajewski W.F., Mantilla R., Gupta V.K. Dissecting the effect of rainfall variability on the statistical structure of peak flows. Advances in Water Resources 2009, 32(10):1508-1525.
39. Marshall E., Randhir T.O. Spatial modeling of land cover change and watershed response using Markovian cellular automata and simulation. Water Resources Research 2008, 44. 10.1029/2006WR005514.
40. Matott L.S. OSTRICH: An Optimization Software Tool, Documentation and User's Guide, Version 1.6 2005, [online] URL, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, (accessed 13.05.09.). http://www.groundwater.buffalo.edu/.
41. McMillan H., Clark M. Rainfall-runoff model calibration using informal likelihood measures within a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling scheme. Water Resources Research 2009, 45.
42. Moradkhani H., Hsu K., Hong Y., Sorooshian S. Investigating the impact of remotely sensed precipitation and hydrologic model uncertainties on the ensemble streamflow forecasting. Geophysical Research Letters 2006, 33(L12401). 10.1029/2006GL026855.
43. MRLC (Multi-Resolution Land Cover - National Land Cover Database) National land cover dataset 2001 (NLCD 2001). Multi-Resolution land characteristics Consortium Available at:, (accessed 26.01.10.). http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd.php.
44. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.E. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10:282-290.
45. NCDC (National Climate Data Center), 2008. National Climate Data Center. National atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, national climate data center.
46. NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction) National stage IV QPE product Available at:, (accessed 16.10.08.). http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/ylin/pcpanl/stage4/.
47. NCGS (North Carolina Geological Survey) North Carolina geology: Raleigh, North Carolina Available at:, (accessed 16.10.08.). http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/geomap.htm.
48. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation, Version 2005 2005, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Center, Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, Texas.
49. Nicótina L., Alessi Celegon E., Rinaldo A., Marani M. On the impact of rainfall patterns on the hydrologic response. Water Resources Research 2008, 44.
50. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) US Climate Division Dataset Mapping Page 2008, Available at:, US Department of Commerce, NOAA, Earth System Research Laboratory, (accessed 16.10.08.). http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/USclimate/USclimdivs.html.
51. North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) North American Regional Reanalysis Homepage 2007, Available at:, National Center for Environmental Prediction, (accessed 24.03.09.). http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/rreanl/.
52. Parajka J., Merz R., Blöschl G. Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian catchments. Hydrological Processes 2007, 21(4):435-446.
53. PRISM Climate Group - Oregon State University PRISM products Available at:, (accessed 16.10.08.). http://www.prismclimate.org.
54. Schaefer S.C., Alber M. Temperature controls a latitudinal gradient in the proportion of watershed nitrogen exported to coastal ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 2007, 85:333-346.
55. Schwede D.B., Dennis R.L., Bitz M.A. The watershed deposition tool: a tool for incorporating atmospheric deposition in water-quality analyses. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2009, 45(4):973-985.
56. Seo D.J. Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gauge data. Journal of Hydrology 1998, 208:36-52.
57. Seo D.J. Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using rain gauge data under fractional coverage conditions. Journal of Hydrology 1998, 208:25-36.
58. Shamarock W.C., Klemp J.B., Dudhia J., Gill D.O., Barker D.M., Duda M., Huang X.-Y., Wang W., Powers J.G. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR Technical note, NCAR/TN-468+STR online available at:. http://wrf-model.org/wrfadmin/docs/arwv2.pdf.
59. Skamarock W.C., Klemp J.B., Dudhia J., Gill D.O., Barker D.M., Duda M., Huang X.-Y., Wang W., Powers J.G. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR Technical note, NCAR/TN-468+STR online available at:. http://wrf-model.org/wrfadmin/docs/arwv2.pdf.
60. State Climate Office of North Carolina North Carolina State University Available at:, (accessed 09.11.08.), Raleigh, North Carolina. http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/.
61. Tetra Tech Development of Second-generation of Mercury Watershed Simulation Technology: Grid-Based Mercury Model Version 2.0, User's Manual 2006, Fairfax, Virginia.
62. Tolson B.A., Shoemaker C.A. Cannonsville Reservoir Watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 337:68-86.
63. Tolson B.A., Shoemaker C.A. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(W01413). 10.1029/2005WR004723.
64. Troutman B.M. Runoff prediction errors and bias in parameter estimation induced by spatial variability of precipitation. Water Resources Research 1983, 19(3):791-810.
65. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Clean Air Interstate Rule 2005, EPA-452/R-05-002. Final Report, US Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
66. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Clean Air Mercury Rule. EPA-452/R-05-003. Final Report. US Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2005, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. U.E.P. Agency (Ed.).
67. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) The BASINS 4 Documentation Available at:, (accessed 01.04.09). http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/bsnsdocs.html.
68. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Ecosystem services research (accessed 19.04.09). http://www.epa.gov/ecology/index.htm.
69. USDA-NRCS (US Department of Agriculture - National Resources Conservation Service) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds 1986, Technical Release 55: Washington, D.C.
70. USGS (US Geological Survey) Water-Data report 2007, 02100500 deep River at Ramseur, NC Available at:, (accessed 26.03.09.). http://wdr.water.usgs.gov/wy2007/pdfs/02100500.2007.pdf.
71. USGS (US Geological Survey) Streamflow of 2007-Water year Summary. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia Available at:, (accessed 27.03.09.). http://water.usgs.gov/waterwatch/2007summary/.
72. van Werkhoven K., Wagener T., Reed P., Tang Y. Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 35:L11403. 10.1029/2008GL034162.
73. Weaver J.C., Pope B.F. Low-flow Characteristics and Discharge Profiles for Selected Streams in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, through 1998. US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4094, with Division of Water Quality of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2001, Raleigh, North Carolina. US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4094, w.D.o.W.Q.o.t.N.C.D.o.E.a.N.R (Ed.).
74. Younger P.M., Freer J.E., Beven K.J. Detecting the effects of spatial variability of rainfall on hydrological modelling within an uncertainty analysis framework. Hydrological Processes 2009, 23(14):1988-2003.