Experience with coflex interspinous implant

Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum

Volumn , Issue 108, 2011, Pages 171-175

  Villarejo, F ^a   Carceller, F ^a,b   De La Riva, A Gómez ^a,b   Budke, M ^a,b  

^a Francisco Villarejo Ortega   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL INFANTIL UNIVERSITARIO NIÑO JESÚS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Degenerative lumbar disc; Interspinous distractor; Interspinous implant; Low back pain; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Non rigid fixation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPINE STABILIZATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; AGE; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952276974     PISSN: 00651419     EISSN: 00016268     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_25     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cho K-S (2005) Clinical outcome of interspinous-U (posterior distraction system) in the elderly lumbar spinal stenosis. 5th Annu¬al Global Symposium on Motion Preservation Technology: Spine Arthroplasty Society.
2. Christie SD, Song KK, Fressler RG (2005) dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine 30 (16S): S73-S78. (Pubitemid 41208821)
3. Eif M, Schenke H (2005) The interspinous U-indications, experi¬ences and results. 5th Annual Global Symposium on Motion Pres¬ervation Technology: Spine Arthroplasty Society, May: 73.
4. Kaech DL, Fernández C, Haninec P (2001) Preliminary experience with the interspinous U device. Rachis 13: 403-404.
5. Kaech DL, Fernández C, Lombardi-Weber D (2000) The Interspi-nous U: A new restabilization device for the lumbar spine. Spinal Restabil Proc 30: 355-362.
6. Kim W-K, Lee S-G, Yoo C-J, Park C-W, Park C-W (2005) Our experiences of interspinous U device in degenerative lumbar disease. 5th Annual Global Symposium on Motion Preservation Technology: Spine Arthroplasty Society, May.
7. Matge G (2002) Dynamic interspinous process "U" fixation. An alternative surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar instability. Scientific Session 2: 28.
8. Park C-K, Kim D-H, Cho K-S (2005) (Non-fusion technology) Therapeutic role of interspinous-U in the patients with degenera¬tive lumbar spondylolisthesis. 5th Annual Global Symposium on Motion Preservation Technology: Spine Arthroplasty Society, May.
9. Tsai KJ, Murakami H, Lowery GL, Hutton WC (2006) A bio-mechanical evaluation of the stabilization effects of an interspi-nous device (coflex). J Surg Orthop Adv 15(3): 167-172.
10. Vena P, Franzoso G, Gastaldi D, Contro R, Dallolio V (2005) A finite element model of the L4-L5 spinal motion segment: biomechanical compatibility of an interspinous device. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 8(1): 7-16.
11. Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A (2002) The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 27: 84-91. (Pubitemid 34219532)
12. Strucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, et al. (1996) Measurement prop¬erties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21: 796-803. (Pubitemid 26112350)
13. Sénégas J, Etchevers JP, Baulny D, Grenier F (1988) Widening of the lumbar vertebral canal as an alternative to laminectomy, in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Fr J Orthop Surg 2: 93-99.
14. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, et al. (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine 21: 2412-2420. (Pubitemid 26403454)
15. Shönstrom N, Lindahl S, Willem J, et al. (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7: 115-121 (Pubitemid 19024709)
16. Lee J, Hida K, Seki T, et al. (2004) An interspinous process distractor (X Stop) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients. Preliminary experiences in 10 consecutives cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 17: 72-77.
17. Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Aaron C, et al. (1989) A mor-phometric study of the lumbar foramen: influence of flexion-exten¬sion movements and of isolated disc collapse. Surg Radiol Anat 11: 97-102. (Pubitemid 19171690)
18. Nowicki BH, Yu S, Reinartz J, et al. (1990) Effect of axial loading on neural foramina and nerve roots in the lumbar spine. Radiology 176: 433-437. (Pubitemid 20225132)
19. Zamani AA, Moriarty R, Hsu L, et al. (1998) Functional MRI of the lumbar spine in erect position in a superconducting open configuration MR system: preliminary results. J Magn Res Imaging 8: 1329-1333. (Pubitemid 28533679)
20. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13: 22-31. (Pubitemid 38269945)