Semi-supervised discourse relation classification with structural learning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6608 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2011, Pages 340-352

  Hernault, Hugo ^a   Bollegala, Danushka ^a   Ishizuka, Mitsuru ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

F-SCORE; FEATURE VECTORS; LABELED TRAINING DATA; SEMI-SUPERVISED; SMALL TRAINING; STRUCTURAL LEARNING; TREEBANKS; UNLABELED DATA; RELATION CLASSIFICATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE AGENTS; TEXT PROCESSING; FORESTRY; SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING;

WORD PROCESSING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 79952275230     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19400-9_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Louis, A., Joshi, A., Nenkova, A.: Discourse indicators for content selection in summarization. In: Proc. of SIGDIAL 2010, pp. 147-156 (2010)
2. Piwek, P., Hernault, H., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: Generating dialogues between virtual agents automatically from text. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 161-174. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
3. Carlson, L., Marcu, D., Okurowski, M.E.: Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In: Proc. of Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, vol. 16, pp. 1-10 (2001)
4. Wolf, F., Gibson, E.: Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study. Computational Linguistics 31, 249-287 (2005)
5. Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A., Webber, B.: The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. In: Proc. of LREC 2008 (2008)
6. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8, 243-281 (1988)
7. Georg, G., Hernault, H., Cavazza, M., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: From rhetorical structures to document structure: Shallow pragmatic analysis for document engineering. In: Proc. of DocEng 2009, pp. 185-192. ACM, New York (2009)
8. Ando, R.K., Zhang, T.: A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6, 1817-1853 (2005)
9. Hernault, H., Bollegala, D., Ishizuka, M.: A semi-supervised approach to improve classification of infrequent discourse relations using feature vector extension. In: Proc. of EMNLP 2010, pp. 399-409 (2010)
10. Marcu, D., Echihabi, A.: An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In: Proc. of ACL 2002, pp. 368-375 (2002)
11. Soricut, R., Marcu, D.: Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In: Proc. of NA-ACL 2003, vol. 1, pp. 149-156 (2003)
12. duVerle, D.A., Prendinger, H.: A novel discourse parser based on Support Vector Machine classification. In: Proc. of ACL 2009, pp. 665-673 (2009)
13. Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)
14. Sagae, K.: Analysis of discourse structure with syntactic dependencies and datadriven shift-reduce parsing. In: Proc. of IWPT 2009, pp. 81-84 (2009)
15. Pitler, E., Raghupathy, M., Mehta, H., Nenkova, A., Lee, A., Joshi, A.: Easily identifiable discourse relations. In: Proc. of COLING 2008 (Posters), pp. 87-90 (2008)
16. Pitler, E., Louis, A., Nenkova, A.: Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. In: Proc. of ACL 2009, pp. 683-691 (2009)
17. Lin, Z., Kan, M.Y., Ng, H.T.: Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In: Proc. of EMNLP 2009, pp. 343-351 (2009)
18. Blum, A., Mitchell, T.: Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proc. of COLT 1998, pp. 92-100 (1998)
19. Caruana, R.: Multitask learning: A knowledge-based source of inductive bias. In: Proc. of ICML 1993, pp. 41-48 (1993)
20. Plackett, R.L.: Karl Pearson and the chi-squared test. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 51, 59-72 (1983)
21. Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., Pereira, F.: Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In: Proc. of EMNLP 2006, pp. 120-128 (2006)
22. Loper, E., Bird, S.: NLTK: The natural language toolkit. In: Proc. of ACL 2002 Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics, pp. 63-70 (2002)
23. Magerman, D.M.: Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. In: Proc. of ACL 1995, pp. 276-283 (1995)
24. Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)
25. Prasad, R., Miltsakaki, E., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., Robaldo, L., Webber, B.: The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 annotation manual. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science (2008)
26. Marcus, M.P., Marcinkiewicz, M.A., Santorini, B.: Building a large annotatedcorpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19, 313-330 (1993)
27. Okazaki, N.: Classias: A collection of machine-learning algorithms for classification (2009), http://www.chokkan.org/software/classias/
28. Zhou, Z.M., Xu, Y., Niu, Z.Y., Lan, M., Su, J., Tan, C.L.: Predicting discourse connectives for implicit discourse relation recognition. In: Proc. of COLING 2010 (Posters), pp. 1507-1514 (2010)
29. Louis, A., Joshi, A., Prasad, R., Nenkova, A.: Using entity features to classify implicit discourse relations. In: Proc. of the SIGDIAL 2010, pp. 59-62 (2010)