Quantifying the Effects of Forest Management Strategies on the Production of Forest Values: Timber, Carbon, Oxygen, Water, and Soil

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 145-152

  Başkent, Emin Zeki ^a   Keleş, Sedat ^b   Kadioǧullari, Ali Ihsan ^a   Bingöl, Özkan ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ET AP; Forest ecosystem; Forest management; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CARBON; ECOSYSTEMS; OXYGEN; SOILS; TIMBER;

FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT POLICIES; FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; FOREST MANAGEMENT UNITS; MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES; MANAGEMENT SIMULATIONS; SIMULATION;

FORESTRY;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; OXYGEN; SOIL EROSION; TIMBER; WATER RESOURCE;

TURKEY;

EID: 79952247720     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-010-9238-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Asan, Ü., Destan, S., & Özkan, U. Y. (2002). Istanbul korularininkarbon depolama, oksijen üretimi ve toz tutma kapasitesinin kestirilmesi [Estimation of carbon storage, oxygen production and dust uptake capacities of high forests in Istanbul]. Orman Amenajamaninda Kavramsal Açi{dotless}limlar ve Yeni Hedefler Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabi (pp. 194-202). Istanbul: Orman Fakü ltesi, Istanbul Üniversitesi. (In Turkish).
2. Backéus, S., Wikström, P., & Lämås, T. (2005). A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 216, 28-40.
3. Başkent, E. Z., Keleş, S., & Yolasi{dotless}ǧmaz, H. A. (2008). Comparing multi-purpose forest management with timber management in incorporating timber, carbon and oxygen values: A case study. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(2), 105-120.
4. Başkent, E. Z., & Keleş, S. (2009). Developing alternative forest management planning strategies incorporating timber, water and carbon values: An examination of their interactions. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 14(4), 467-480.
5. Bertomeu, M., & Romero, C. (2001). Managing forest biodiversity: A zero-one goal programming approach. Agricultural Systems, 68, 197-213.
6. Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2003). Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: A goal programming approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 447-457.
7. Guo, Z., Xiao, X., Gan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2001). Ecosystem functions, services and their values: A case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological Economics, 38, 141-154.
8. Hoen, H. F., & Solberg, B. (1994). Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Science, 40, 429-451.
9. Hof, J. G., & Bevers, M. (2000). Optimal timber harvest scheduling with spatially defined sediment objectives. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(9), 1494-1500.
10. Huston, M., & Marland, G. (2003). Carbon management and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management, 67, 77-86.
11. Jordan, G. A., & Başkent, E. Z. (1992). A case study in spatial wood supply analysis. The Forestry Chronicle, 68(4), 503-516.
12. Kangas, J., & Kuusipalo, J. (1993). Integrating biodiversity into forest management planning and decision-making. Forest Ecology and Management, 61, 1-15.
13. Kazana, V., Fawcett, R. H., & Mutch, W. E. S. (2003). A decision support modelling framework for multiple use forest management: the Queen Elizabeth Forest case study in Scotland. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(1), 102-115.
14. Keleş, S., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Modeling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16(3), 473-479.
15. Keleş, S., Yolasi{dotless}ǧmaz, H. A., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Long term modeling and analyzing of some important forest ecosystem values with linear programming. Fresenius' Environmental Bulletin, 16(8), 963-972.
16. Keleş, S. (2008). Designing and developing a decision support system for forest management planning. Ph. D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
17. Köchli, D. A., & Brang, P. (2005). Simulating effects of forest management on selected public forest goods and services: A case study. Forest Ecology and Management, 209, 57-68.
18. Hynynen, J., Ahtikoski, A., Siitonen, J., Sievanen, R., & Liski, J. (2005). Aplying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 5-18.
19. Krcmar, E., Stennes, B., van Kooten, G. C., & Vertinsky, I. (2001). Carbon sequestration and land management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 616-629.
20. Masera, O. R., Garza-Caligaris, J. F., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Liski, J., Nabuurs, G. J., et al. (2003). Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: The CO2FIX V. 2 approach. Ecological Modelling, 164, 177-199.
21. Mumcu, D. (2007). Yalni{dotless}zçam ormanlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n ekosistem tabanli{dotless} çok amaçli{dotless} planlanmasi{dotless} ve orman dinamiǧinin ekonomik ve idare süreleri açi{dotless}si{dotless}ndan deǧerlendirilmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon: K. T.Ü.
22. Pukkala, T., Nuutinen, T., & Kangas, J. (1995). Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(3), 185-195.
23. Pukkala, T. (2002). Measuring non wood forest outputs in numerical forest planning. In T. Pukkala (Ed.), Multi objective forest planning (pp. 173-207). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Yolasiǧmaz, H. A. (2004). The concept and implementation of forest ecosystem management (a case study of Artvin Planning Unit). Ph. D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.