Developing alternative forest management planning strategies incorporating timber, water and carbon values: An examination of their interactions

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 467-480

  Baskent, Emin Zeki ^a   Keleş, Sedat ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Carbon flow; Forest dynamics; Forest ecosystem; Linear Programming; Sustainable forest management; Water production

Indexed keywords

CARBON; ECOSYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; TIMBER;

CARBON FLOW; FOREST DYNAMICS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WATER PRODUCTION;

FORESTRY;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PLANNING PROCESS; STAND STRUCTURE; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; TIMBER;

EID: 70349932493     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-008-9148-4     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Apps, M. J., Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S. J., & Bhatti, J. S. (1999). Carbon budget of the Canadian forest product sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 2, 25-41. DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00006-4.
2. Asan, Ü. (1999). Orman Kaynaklari{dotless}ni{dotless}n Çok Amaçli{dotless} Kullani{dotless}mi{dotless} ve Planlama Sistemleri. Ormanlari{dotless}n Çok Amaçli{dotless} Planlanmasi{dotless} Toplanti{dotless}si{dotless}, 5-6 May, Bolu-Türkiye, 33-40.
3. Asan, Ü., Destan, S. & Özkan, U. Y. (2002). Istanbul korulari{dotless}ni{dotless}n karbon depolama, oksijen üretimi ve toz tutma kapasitesinin kestirilmesi. Orman Amenajamani{dotless}nda Kavramsal Açi{dotless}li{dotless}mlar ve Yeni Hedefler Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabi{dotless}, Istanbul-Türkiye. 194-202.
4. Backéus, S., Wikström, P., & Lämås, T. (2005). A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 216, 28-40. DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.059.
5. Başkent, E. Z., & Jordan, G. A. (2002). Forest landscape (ecosystems) management with simulated annealing. Forest Ecology and Management, 165/1-3, 29-45. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00654-5.
6. Baskent, E. Z., & Keles, S. (2005). Spatial forest planning: A review. Ecological Modelling, 188, 145-173. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.059.
7. Bateman, I. J., & Lovett, A. A. (2000). Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 60, 301-323. DOI 10.1006/jema.2000.0388.
8. Bertomeu, M., & Romero, C. (2001). Managing forest biodiversity: A zero-one goal programming approach. Agricultural Systems, 68, 197-213. DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00007-5.
9. Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982). A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 55, 3-23. DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2.
10. Cannell, M. G. R. (1999). Growing trees to sequester carbon in the UK: Answers to some common questions. Forestry, 72(3), 237-247. DOI 10.1093/forestry/72.3.237.
11. Carus, S. (1999). Growth and yield of even-aged oriental beech. PhD thesis, Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul-Turkey.
12. Church, R. L., Murray, A. T., & Weintraub, A. (1998). Locational issues in forest management. Location Science, 6, 137-153. DOI 10.1016/S0966-8349(98)00051-5.
13. Creedy, J., & Wurzbacher, A. D. (2001). The economic value of a forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits. Ecological Economics, 38, 71-83. DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00148-3.
14. Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2003). Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: A goal programming approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 447-457. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00075-0.
15. Enderlein, R., & Bernardini, F. (2005). Nature for water: Ecosystem services and water management. Natural Resources Forum, 29, 253-255. DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00135.x.
16. Ercanli{dotless}, I. (2003). Construction of variable density table for oriental spruce in Artvin forest enterprise. Msc thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Trabzon-Turkey, 93 p.
17. Ferguson, I. S. (1999). Sustainable forest management. Oxford: Oxford University Press 176 p.
18. Field, R. C., Dress, P. E., & Fortson, J. C. (1980). Complementary linear and goal programming procedures for timber harvest scheduling. Forest Science, 26, 121-133.
19. Görcelioǧlu, E. (1992). Havzalarda Orman ve Otlak Alanlari{dotless} Amenajmani{dotless}ni{dotless}n Su Verimine ve Kalitesine Etkileri, İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri B, 42(1-2), 17-30.
20. Haight, R. G., Monserui, R. A., & Chew, J. D. (1992). Optimal harvesting with stand density targets: Managing Rocky Mountain Conifer Stands for multiple forest outputs. Forest Science, 38, 554-574.
21. Hoen, H. F., & Solberg, B. (1994). Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Science, 40, 429-451.
22. Hof, J. G., & Bevers, M. (2000). Optimal timber harvest scheduling with spatially defined sediment objectives. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(9), 1494-1500. DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-9-1494.
23. Hof, J. G., Pickens, J. B., & Barlett, E. T. (1986). A maxmin approach to non-declining yield timber harvest scheduling problems. Forest Science, 32, 663-666.
24. Hof, J. G., & Raphael, M. G. (1993). Some mathematical programming approaches for optimizing timber age-class distributions to meet multispecies wildlife populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 828-834. DOI 10.1139/x93-107.
25. Hoganson, H. M., & McDill, M. E. (1993). More on forest regulation: An LP perspective. Forest Science, 39, 321-347.
26. Hornbeck, J. W., Adams, M. B., Corbett, E. S., Verry, E. S., & Lynch, J. A. (1993). Long - term impacts of forest treatments on water yield: A summary for northeastern USA. Journal of Hydrology, 150, 323-344. DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90115-P.
27. Huston, M., & Marland, G. (2003). Carbon management and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management, 67, 77-86 Medline DOI 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00190-1.
28. Johnson, K. N., & Scheurman, H. L. (1977). Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives-discussion and synthesis. Forest Science Monograph, 18, 31.
29. Kaipainen, T., Liski, J., Pussinen, A., & Karjalainen, T. (2004). Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 205-219. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.03.001.
30. Kangas, J. (1992). Multiple use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 259-268.
31. Kangas, J., & Kuusipalo, J. (1993). Integrating biodiversity into forest management planning and decision-making. Forest Ecology and Management, 61, 1-15. DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(93)90186-Q.
32. Karjalainen, T., Pussinen, A., Kellomaki, S., & Makipaa, R. (1999). Scenarios for the carbon balance of Finnish forests and wood products. Environmental Science & Policy, 2, 165-175. DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(98)00047-1.
33. Karjalainen, T., Pussinen, A., Liski, J., Nabuurs, G. J., Erhard, M., Eggers, T., et al. (2002). An approach towards an estimate of the impact of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget: Germany as a case study. Forest Ecology and Management, 162, 87-103. c.
34. Keleş, S. (2003). Optimization of timber and water production values of forest ecosystems using linear programming. Master thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Trabzon-Turkey.
35. Keleş, S., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Modeling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16(3), 473-479.
36. Keleş, S., Yolasi{dotless}ǧmaz, H. A., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Long term modeling and analyzing of some important forest ecosystem values with linear programming. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 16(8), 963-972.
37. Krcmar, E., Stennes, B., van Kooten, G. C., & Vertinsky, I. (2001). Carbon sequestration and land management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 616-629. DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00326-X.
38. Krcmar, E., van Kooten, G. C., & Vertinsky, I. (2005). Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: Compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives. Ecological Modelling, 185, 451-468. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.014.
39. Kurttila, M. (2001). The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning- a landscape ecological perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 142, 129-142. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00343-1.
40. Leuschner, W. A. (1990). Forest regulation, harvest scheduling, and planni{dotless}ng techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
41. Liu, J., Peng, C., Apps, M., Dang, Q., Banfield, E., & Kurz, W. (2002). Historic carbon budgets of Ontario's forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 169, 103-114. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00301-8.
42. Malchow-Moller, N., Strange, N., & Thorsen, B. J. (2004). Real-options aspects of adjacency constraints. Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 261-270. DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.002.
43. Masera, O. R., Garza-Caligaris, J. F., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Liski, J., Nabuurs, G. J., et al. (2003). Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: The CO2FIX V.2 approach. Ecological Modelling, 164, 177-199. DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00419-2.
44. Milne, R., & Brown, T. A. (1997). Carbon in the vegetation and soils of Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Management, 49, 413-433. DOI 10.1006/jema.1995.0118.
45. Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2000). Climate change and forest sinks: Factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 211-235. DOI 10.1006/jeem.1999.1120.
46. Petersen, A. K., & Solberg, B. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions and costs over the life cycle of wood and alternative flooring materials. Climate Change, 64, 143-167. DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024689.70143.79.
47. Pukkala, T. (2002). Measuring non wood forest outputs in numerical forest planning. In T. Pukkala (Ed.), Multi-objective forest planning (pp. 173-207). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Pukkala, T., Nuutinen, T., & Kangas, J. (1995). Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(3), 185-195. DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(94)00195-9.
49. Pussinen, A., Karjalainen, T., Kellomaki, S., & Makipaa, S. (1997). Potential contribution of the forest sector to carbon sequestration in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13(6), 377-387. DOI 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10048-4.
50. Raymer, A. K. P., Gobakken, T., Hoen, H. F., & Solberg, B. (2005). GAYA-J/C: A forest management optimization model with a complete carbon flow account. Manuscript. In PhD thesis of Raymer "Modeling and analyzing climate gas impacts of forest management", Norwegian University of Life Sciences, p. 18.
51. Raymer, A. K. P., Gobakken, T., Hoen, H. F., & Solberg, B. (2005). Optimal forest management and cost-effectivenes when increasing the carbon benefit from a forest area-a case study of Hedmark County in Norway. Manuscript. In PhD thesis of Raymer "Modeling and analyzing climate gas impacts of forest management", Norwegian University of Life Sciences, p. 23.
52. Rowse, J., & Center, C. J. (1998). Forest harvesting to optimize timber production and water runoff. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 32(4), 277-293. DOI 10.1016/S0038-0121(97)00038-4.
53. Solberg, B. (1997). Economic aspects of forestry and climate change. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 77(3), 239-233.
54. Song, C., & Woodcock, C. E. (2003). A regional forest ecosystem carbon budget model: Impacts of forest age structure and land use history. Ecological Modelling, 164, 33-47. DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00013-9.
55. SPO (2001). VIII. Five year development plan: Forestry special impression commission report. State Planning Organization Publication Number: 2531, Ankara, 539 pp.
56. Stednick, J. D. (1996). Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. Journal of Hydrology, 176, 79-95. DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02780-7.
57. Strange, N., Tarp, P., Helles, F., & Brodie, J. D. (1999). A four-stage approach to evaluate management alternatives in multiple-use forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 124, 79-91. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00048-1.
58. Sun, O., Eren, E., & Orpak, M. (1977). Rates of wood products of various forest species in Turkey. TÜBİTAK/TOAG-288, Research paper.
59. Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., Shepard, J. P., Amatya, D. M., Riekerk, H., Comerford, N. B., et al. (2001). Effects of timber management on the hydrology of wetland forests in the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 143, 227-236. DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00520-X.
60. Tecle, A., Shrestha, B. P., & Duckstein, L. (1998). A multiobjective decision support system for multiresource forest management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 7(1), 23-40. DOI 10.1023/A:1008671129325.
61. Türker, M. F. (2000). Forest management lecturer notes. Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Lecturer's notes, No: 59, Trabzon-Turkey, 226 p.
62. UN-ECE/FAO (2000). Global forest resources assessment 2000, Main Report, Geneva timber and forest study papers, No: 17, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
63. van Kooten, G. C., Grainger, A., Ley, E., Marland, G., & Solberg, B. (1997). Conceptual issues related to carbon sequestration: Uncertainty and time. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 65-82.
64. Whitehead, P. G., & Robinson, M. (1993). Experimental basin studies-an international and historical perspective of forest impacts. Journal of Hydrology, 145, 217-230. DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90055-E.
65. Yolasi{dotless}ǧmaz, H. A. (2004). The concept and the implementation of forest ecosystem management (a case study of Artvin Planning Unit). PhD thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Trabzon- Turkey, 185 p.