Falling on deaf ears

Psychologist

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 178-181

  Munro, Geoffrey D ^a  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952233894     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bushman, B.J. & Anderson, C.A. (2001). Media violence and the American public. American Psychologist, 56, 477-489.
2. Cohen, G.L., Aronson, J. & Steele, C.M. (2000). When beliefs yield to evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1151-1164.
3. Cohen, G.L., Sherman, D.K., Bastardi, A. et al. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 415-430.
4. Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J.A. & Holzberg, A.D. (1989). Ambiguity and selfevaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.
5. Eagly, A., Wood, W. & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435.
6. Jones, M.D. & McBeth, M.K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? The Policy Studies Journal, 38, 329-353.
7. Kahan, D. (2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463, 296-297.
8. Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Cohen, G.L. et al. (in press). Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn't, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law and Human Behavior.
9. Lohr, J.M., Olatunji, B.O., Baumeister, R.F. & Bushman, B.J. (2007). The psychology of anger venting and empirically supported alternatives that do no harm. The Scientific Reviewof Mental Health Practice: Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and Social Work, 5, 53-64.
10. Lord, C.G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
11. MacCoun, R.J. & Paletz, S. (2009). Citizens' perceptions of ideological bias in research on public policy controversies. Political Psychology, 30, 43-65.
12. Munro, G.D. (2010). The scientific impotence excuse: Discounting beliefthreatening scientific abstracts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 579-600.
13. Munro, G.D. & Ditto, P.H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 636-653.
14. Munro, G.D., Stansbury, J.A. & Tsai, J. (in press). A causal role for negative affect: Misattribution in biased evaluations of scientific information. Self and Identity.
15. Nisbett, R.E. & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Nisbett, R.E., Fong, G.T., Lehman, D.R. & Cheng, P.W. (1987). Teaching reasoning. Science, 238, 625-631. (Pubitemid 17158292)
17. Proxmire speaks out on social science. (1975, May). APA Monitor, 6.
18. Weisberg, D.S., Keil, F.C., Goodstein, J. et al. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470-477. (Pubitemid 351317605)