Novel optical system for in vitro quantification of full surface strain fields in small arteries: II. Correction for refraction and illustrative results

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 227-237

  Genovese, K ^a   Lee, Y U ^b   Humphrey, J D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

^b Texas A and M University   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial testing; Digital image correlation; Mechanical properties; Mechanics; Stereo vision

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL MECHANICS; ARTERIAL TESTING; CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS; CYLINDRICAL SPECIMENS; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATIONS; GENETIC MODELS; HYPER ELASTIC; IMAGE CORRELATIONS; IN-VITRO; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MOUSE CAROTID ARTERIES; NON-LINEAR REGRESSION; NONCONTACTING OPTICAL MEASUREMENT; PHYSIOLOGIC SALINES; SURFACE PREPARATION; SURFACE STRAIN FIELD; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; TRANSGENIC MICE;

CYLINDERS (SHAPES); DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); IMAGE ANALYSIS; OPTICAL DATA PROCESSING; OPTICAL SYSTEMS; REFRACTION; STEREO VISION; STRAIN; STRAIN MEASUREMENT;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ANIMAL; ARTERY; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; THORACIC AORTA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; AORTA, THORACIC; ARTERIES; BIOMECHANICS; CAROTID ARTERY, COMMON; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MICE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OPTICAL DEVICES; OPTICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 79952225759     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.545824     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baek S, Gleason RL, Rajagopal KR, Humphrey JD. 2007. Theory of small on large for computing fluid-solid interactions in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 196:3070-3078.
2. Dietz HC, Mecham RP. 2000. Mouse models of genetic diseases resulting from mutations in elastic fiber proteins. Matrix Biol. 19:481-488.
3. Eberth JF, Taucer AI, Wilson E, Humphrey JD. 2009. Mechanics of carotid arteries from a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Ann Biomed Eng. 37:1093-1104.
4. Faugeras OD. 1993. Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Genovese K, Lee YU, Humphrey JD. 2011. Novel optical system for in vitro quantification of full surface strain fields in small arteries: I. Theory and design. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, submitted.
6. Gleason RL, Dye WW, Wilson E, Humphrey JD. 2008. Quantification of the mechanical behavior of carotid arteries from wild-type, dystrophin-deficient, and sarcoglycan-delta knockout mice. J Biomech. 41:3213-3218.
7. Gleason RL, Grey S, Wilson E, Humphrey JD. 2004. A multiaxial computer-controlled organ culture and biomechanical device for mouse carotid arteries. ASME J Biomech Eng. 126:787-795.
8. Heistand MR, Pedrigi RM, Delange SL, Dziezyc J, Humphrey JD. 2005. Multiaxial mechanical behavior of the porcine anterior lens capsule. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 4:168-177.
9. Humphrey JD. 2002. Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Ke X, Sutton MA, Lessner SM, Yost M. 2008. Robust stereo vision and calibration methodology for accurate threedimensional digital image correlation measurements on submerged objects. J Strain Anal. 43:689-704.
11. Piegl LA, Tiller W. 1997. The NURBS book. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Wan W, Yanagisawa H, Gleason RL. 2010. Biomechanical and microstructural properties of common carotid arteries from fibulin-5 null mice. Ann Biomed Engr. 38(12):3605-3617.