Are We Moving Back to the City? Examining Residential Mobility in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area

Growth and Change

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 48-71

  Sturtevant, Lisa A ^a   Jung, Yu Jin ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZATION; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; IMMIGRATION POLICY; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; METROPOLITAN AREA; POLICY MAKING; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; SUBURBAN AREA;

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 79952206450     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: 14682257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00543.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Berube, A., and B. Forman 2002. Living in the edge: Decentralization within cities in the 1990s. The Living Cities Census Series. Washington, DC: The Bookings Institution.
3. Birch, E.L. 2002. Having a longer view on downtown living. Journal of the American Planning Association 68(1): 5-21.
4. Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
5. Engels, R., and M.K. Healy 1981. Measuring interstate migration flows: An origin-destination network based on internal revenue service records. Environment and Planning A 13: 1345-1360.
6. Ewen, E. 2001. Picture windows: How the suburbs happened. New York: Basic Books.
7. Fishman, R. 1987. Bourgeois utopias: The rise and fall of suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
8. Fishman, R. 2005. The fifth migration. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(4): 357-366.
9. Galle, O.R., and M.W. Williams 1972. Metropolitan migration efficiency. Demography 9(4): 655-664.
10. Henrie, C.J., and D.A. Plane 2008. Exodus from the California core: Using demographic effectiveness and migration impact measures to examine population redistribution within the Western United States. Population Research and Policy Review 27: 43-64.
11. Huang, E.T., and J. Kim 2000. One-percent sample study report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau Statistical Research Division.
12. Hughes, J.W., and J.J. Seneca 2004. The beginning of the end of sprawl? Rutgers Regional Report Issue Paper 21.
13. Jackson, R.J., and C. Kochtitzky 2001. Creating a health environment: The impact of the built environment on public health. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse Monograph Series.
14. Katz, B. 2001. The federal role in curbing sprawl. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 572: 66-77.
15. Leinberger, C.B. 2005. Turning around downtown: Twelve steps to revitalization. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
16. Manson, G.A., and R.E. Groop 2000. U.S. intercounty migration in the 1990s: People and income move down the urban hierarchy. The Professional Geographer 52: 493-504.
17. McHugh, K.E., and P. Gober 1992. Short-term dynamics of the U.S. interstate migration system, 1980-1988. Growth and Change 23(4): 428-445.
18. Muth, R. 1968. Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Nechyba, T.J., and R.P. Walsh 2004. Urban sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(4): 177-200.
20. Plane, D.A. 1984. A systemic demographic efficiency analysis of US interstate migration system 1980-1988. Growth and Change 23: 428-445.
21. Plane, D.A. 1999. Geographical pattern analysis of income migration in the United States. International Journal of Population Geography 5: 195-212.
22. Plane, D.A., C.J. Henrie, and M.J. Perry 2005. Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course. PNAS 102(43): 15313-15318.
23. Plane, D.A., and P.A. Rogerson 1994. The geographical analysis of population with applications to planning and business. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
24. Puentes, R., and M. Orfield 2002. Valuing America's first suburbs: A policy agenda for older suburbs in the Midwest. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25. Shumway, J.M., and S.M. Otterstrom 2001. Spatial patterns of migration and income change in the mountain west: The dominance of service-based, amenity-rich counties. Professional Geographers 53(4): 492-502.
26. Singer, A. 2003. At home in the nation's capital: Immigrant trends in metropolitan Washington. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
27. Sohmer, R.R., and R.E. Lang 2003. Downtown rebound. In Redefining urban and suburban American: Evidence from Census 2000, ed. B. Katz and R.E. Lang, 63-74. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28. Stilgoe, J.R. 1990. Borderland: Origins of the American suburb, 1820-1939. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Thibaudeau, Y. 2001. Can we ignore the migration of income tax non-filers when benchmarking the American Community Survey's county estimates? Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
30. Tiebout, C.M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416-424.
31. U.S. Internal Revenue Service. 2006. Supplemental documentation for external data products. Washington, DC: IRS.
32. Vias, A.C., and C.O. Collins 2003. Differential population and income migration in the great plains, 1995-1998. Great Plains Research 13: 231-252.
33. Voss, P.R., R.B. Hammer, and A.M. Meier 2001. Migration analysis: A case study for local public policy. Population Research and Policy Review 20: 587-603.