Exodus from the California Core: Using demographic effectiveness and migration impact measures to examine population redistribution within the Western United States

Population Research and Policy Review

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-64

  Henrie, Christopher J ^a   Plane, David A ^b  

^a U S CENSUS BUREAU   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Demographic effectiveness; Inward population redistribution; Migration impact; Urban hierarchy

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; DEMOGRAPHY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INTERNAL MIGRATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION MIGRATION; SOCIAL IMPACT; URBAN POPULATION; URBAN SYSTEM;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC COAST [NORTH AMERICA]; PACIFIC COAST [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38049018030     PISSN: 01675923     EISSN: 15737829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-007-9053-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Beale, C. L. (1975). The revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
2. Federal Register (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; Notice. December 27. Part IX: Office of Management and Budget, pp. 82228-82238.
3. Fitzsimmons, J. D., & Ratcliffe, M. R. (2004). Reflections on the review of metropolitan areas standards in the United States, 1990-2000. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy (pp. 347-364). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
4. Franklin, R. S., & Plane, D. A. (2006). Pandora's box: The potential and peril of migration data from the American Community Survey. International Regional Science Review, 29, 231-246.
5. Frey, W. H., & Speare, A., Jr. (1992). The revival of metropolitan population growth in the United States: An assessment of findings from the 1990 census. Population and Development Review, 18 (1), 129-146.
6. Fuguitt, G. V. (1985). The nonmetropolitan population turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 259-280.
7. Fuguitt, G. V., & Beale, C. L. (1996). Recent trends in metropolitan-nonmetropolitan migration: Towards a new turnaround? Growth and Change, 27, 156-174.
8. Gottmann, J. (1961). Megalopolis: The urbanized northeastern seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
9. Henrie, C. J., & Plane, D. A. (2000). Deconcentration and population growth in the West Coast megalopolis: 1969-1997. Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, Arcata, CA, September.
10. Henrie, C. J., & Plane, D. A. (2006). Decentralization of the nation's Main Street: New coastal-proximity-based portrayals of population distribution in the United States, 1950-2000. Professional Geographer, 58, 448-459.
11. Johnson, K. M. (1999). The rural rebound. Reports on America, 1(3), 1-19.
12. Kirsch, S. L. (1993). California's redistributive role in interstate migration, 1935-1990. The California Geographer, 63, 59-78.
13. Kontuly, T., & Bierens, H. J. (1990). Testing the recession theory as an explanation for the migration turnaround. Environment and Planning A, 22, 253-270.
14. Long, J. F. (1981). Population deconcentration in the United States. Special demographic analysis CDS-81-5. Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census.
15. Long, L., & DeAre, D. (1988). U.S. population redistribution: A perspective on the nonmetropolitan turnaround. Population and Development Review, 14(3), 433-450.
16. Long, L., & Nucci, A. (1997). The Hoover Index of population concentration: A correction and an update. Professional Geographer, 49(4), 431-440.
17. Long, L., & Nucci, A. (1999). The "clean break" revisited: Is the U.S. population again deconcentrating? Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census.
18. Manson, G. A., & Groop, R. E. (2000). U.S. intercounty migration in the 1990s: People and income move down the urban hierarchy. Professional Geographer, 52 (3), 493-504.
19. McHugh, K. E., & Gober, P. (1992). Short-term dynamics of the U.S. interstate migration system, 1980-1988. Journal of Regional Science, 32(2), 428-445.
20. Morrill, R. L. (1978). Population redistribution, 1965-1975. Growth and Change, April, 35-43.
21. Otterstrom, S. M., & Shumway, J. M. (2003). Deserts and oases: The continuing concentration of population in the American Mountain West. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 445-462.
22. Perry, M. J. (2005). Appearances can be deceiving: Comparative population densities of American cities. Paper presented at the 101st annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Denver CO, April.
23. Plane, D. A. (1984). A systematic demographic effectiveness analysis of U.S. interstate population exchange, 1935-1980. Economic Geography, 60, 294-312.
24. Plane, D.A. (1994). The wax and wane of interstate migration patterns in the USA in the 1980s: A demographic effectiveness field perspective. Environment and Planning A, 26, 1545-1561.
25. Plane, D. A. (1999). Migration drift. The Professional Geographer, 51(1), 1-11.
26. Plane, D. A. (2003). Perplexity, complexity, metroplexity, microplexity: Perspectives for future research on regional growth and change. The Review of Regional Studies, 33(1), 104-120.
27. Plane, D. A. (2005). The conditions of coastality. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 67, 9-23.
28. Plane, D. A. (2007). Trickle-down demographics: The role of mega-metropolitan areas in recent U.S. population growth and redistribution. Paper presented at the 20th Pacific Conference of the Regional Science Association International, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May.
29. Plane, D. A., Henrie, C. H., & Perry, M. J. (2005). Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (43), 15313-15318.
30. Plane, D. A., & Isserman, A. M. (1983). U.S. interstate labor force migration: An analysis of trends, net exchanges, and migration subsystems. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 17(5-6), 251-266.
31. Plane, D. A., & Rogerson, P. A. (1994). The geographical analysis of population with applications planning and business. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32. Ratcliffe, M. R. (2006). Creating metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Measuring Rural Diversity Policy Series, 3 (1).
33. Richter, K. (1985). Nonmetropolitan growth in the late 1970s: The end of the turnaround? Demography, 22(2), 245-263.
34. Roseman, C. C., & McHugh, K. E. (1982). Metropolitan areas as redistributors of population. Urban Geography, 3(1), 22-33.
35. Shryock, H. S. (1959). The efficiency of internal migration in the United States. In International Population Conference (proceedings) Vienna (pp. 685-694). Union internationale pour l'étude scientifique de la population. Vienna, Austria: Im Selbstverlag.
36. Shryock, H. W. (1964). Population mobility within the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Community and Family Study Center.
37. Starrs, P. F., & Wright, J. B. (1995). Great Basin growth and the withering of California's Pacific idyll. The Geographical Review, 85 (4), 417-436.
38. Thomas, D. S. (1941). Social and economic aspects of Swedish population movements: 1750-1933. New York: MacMillan.
39. U.S. Census Bureau (2000). Census 2000. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/.
40. Vining, D. R., & Strauss, A. (1977). A demonstration that the current deconcentration of population in the United States is a clean break with the past. Environment and Planning A, 9, 751-758.