Coronary artery calcium score: Influence of the reconstruction interval on cardiac risk stratification in asymptomatic patients using dual-source computed tomography

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 233-237

  Jensen, C J ^a   Jochims, M ^a   Eberle, H C ^a   Wolf, A ^a   Nassenstein K ^b   Forsting, M ^b   Bruder, O ^a   Schlosser, T ^b  

^a ELISABETH KRANKENHAUS ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agatston score; calcium scoring; cardiac; cardiac risk stratification; CT

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ADULT; AGATSTON SCORE; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUAL SCORE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CYCLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AGED; CALCINOSIS; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79952204017     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245813     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nassenstein K, Waltering K, Hollenhorst M et al. [Quantification of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction using cardiac MRI]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 669-674
2. Nassenstein K, Bruder O, Breuckmann F et al. Prevalence, pattern, and functional impact of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular hypertrophy due to aortic valve stenosis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 472-476
3. Fischbach R, Miller S, Beer M et al. [Recommendations of the Heart Diagnosis Working Group of the German Roentgen Society for use of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in heart diagnosis. 1 - Computerized tomography]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 700-706
4. Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froehlich J et al. Coronary artery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology 1994; 192: 619-623 (Pubitemid 24266771)
5. Rumberger JA, Sheedy 3rd PF, Breen JF et al. Coronary calcium, as determined by electron beam computed tomography, and coronary disease on arteriogram. Effect of patient's sex on diagnosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 1363-1367
6. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995; 92: 2157-2162
7. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J et al. Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 1996; 94: 1175-1192
8. Keelan PC, Bielak LF, Ashai K et al. Long-term prognostic value of coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 104: 412-417 (Pubitemid 32678270)
9. Detrano R, Hsiai T, Wang S et al. Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 285-290 (Pubitemid 26045496)
10. Detrano RC, Wong ND, Tang W et al. Prognostic significance of cardiac cinefluoroscopy for coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high risk subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 354-358 (Pubitemid 24246532)
11. Schlosser T, Hunold P, Schmermund A et al. Coronary artery calcium score: influence of reconstruction interval at 16-detector row CTwith retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Radiology 2004; 233: 586-589 (Pubitemid 39423822)
12. Schlosser T, Hunold P, Voigtlander T et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: influence of reconstruction interval and reconstruction increment using 64-MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1063-1068 (Pubitemid 46496944)
13. Artmann A, Enayati S, Ratzenbock M et al. [Image quality of CT angiography of coronary arteries depending on the degree of coronary calcification using a dual source CT scanner]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 863-869
14. Luders F, Fischbach R, Seifarth H et al. [Dual-source computed tomography: effect on regional and global left ventricular function assessment compared to magnetic resonance imaging]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 962-969
15. Kuettner A, Gehann B, Spolnik J et al. Strategies for dose-optimized imaging in pediatric cardiac dual source CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 339-348
16. Groen JM, Greuter MJ, Vliegenthart R et al. Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 24 (5): 547-556
17. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2354-2360 (Pubitemid 47537778)
18. Rist C, Johnson TR, Becker A et al. [Dual-source cardiac CT imaging with improved temporal resolution: Impact on image quality and analysis of left ventricular function]. Radiologe 2007; 47: 287-290, 292-284
19. Wust W, Zunker C, May M et al. [Septal delineation using a 20% diluted contrast chaser bolus in coronary CT angiography: a comparison of 64-slice and dual source CT]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 324-331
20. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97: 1837-1847 (Pubitemid 28213628)
21. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006; 113: 1305-1310 (Pubitemid 43739452)
22. Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Sinha AM et al. Variation of the coronary calcium score depending on image reconstruction interval and scoring algorithm. Invest Radiol 2002; 37: 496-502 (Pubitemid 34966855)
23. Gerber TC, O'Brien PC, Pastor K et al. Evaluation of reconstruction windows for multislice computed tomography in quantification of coronary calcium. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 108-118 (Pubitemid 36131086)
24. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J AmColl Cardiol 1990; 15: 827-832 (Pubitemid 20101575)
25. Altman DG, Bland JM. Comparing several groups using analysis of variance. Bmj 1996; 312: 1472-1473 (Pubitemid 26170626)
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. Bmj 1996; 313: 41-42 (Pubitemid 26229891)
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Correlation, regression, and repeated data. Bmj 1994; 308: 896 (Pubitemid 24102403)
28. Schmermund A, Mohlenkamp S, Berenbein S et al. Population-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using electron-beam computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2006; 185: 177-182 (Pubitemid 43117566)
29. Anders K, Baum U, Gauss S et al. [Initial experience with prospectively triggered, sequential CT coronary angiography on a 128-slice scanner]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 332-338
30. Hofman MB, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Quantification of in-plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 568-576
31. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J et al. In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 2000; 216: 457-463 (Pubitemid 30599866)