Non-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiency

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3607-3614

  Eriksson, Per ^a,b   Mohammed, Ahmed Abdulilah ^a,b   De Geer, Jakob ^a,b   Kihlberg, Johan ^a,b   Persson, Anders ^a   Granerus, Göran ^a   Nyström, Fredrik ^a   Smedby, Örjan ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computed tomography angiography; Magnetic resonance angiography; Renal artery stenosis; Renography; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN 2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; CAPTOPRIL; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IODIXANOL; SONOVUE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; RENOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADOLESCENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RENAL ARTERY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79952197674     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq259     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wheatley K, Ives N, Gray R et al. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2009; 12: 1953-1962
2. Textor SC. Ischemic nephropathy: Where are we now? J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 1974-1982 (Pubitemid 39031336)
3. Levin A, Linas S, Luft F et al. Controversies in renal artery stenosis: A review by the American Society of Nephrology Advisory Group on hypertension. Am J Nephrol 2007; 27: 212-220 (Pubitemid 46588189)
4. Caps M, Zierler RE, Polissar N et al. Risk of atrophy in kidneys with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Kidney Int 1998; 53: 735-742 (Pubitemid 28124290)
5. Zucchelli P, Zuccalà A. Can we accurately diagnose nephrosclerosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 2-5
6. Taylor A, Villines T, Stanek E et al. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2113-2122
7. Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Atherosclerotic disease regression with statins: Studies using vascular markers. Int J Cardiol 2004; 96: 447-459 (Pubitemid 39099508)
8. Fleg JL, Mete M, Howard BV et al. Effect of statins alone versus statins plus ezetimibe on carotid atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes: The SANDS (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetic Study) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 2198-2205
9. Takayama T, Hiro T, Yamagishi M et al. Effect of rosuvastatin on coronary atheroma in stable coronary artery disease: Multicenter coronary atherosclerosis study measuring effects of rosuvastatin using intravascular ultrasound in Japanese subjects (COSMOS). Circ J 2009; 73: 2110-2117
10. Taylor A, Nally J, Aurell M et al. Radionuclides in Nephrourology Group. Consensus Group on ACEI Renography. Consensus report on ACE inhibitor renography for detecting renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1876-1882 (Pubitemid 26378382)
11. Desberg AL, Paushter DM, Lammert GK et al. Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1990; 177: 749-753
12. Williams GJ, Macaskill P, Chan SF et al. Comparative accuracy of renal duplex sonographic parameters in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Paired and unpaired analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 798-811
13. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast- enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1135-1140 (Pubitemid 32217618)
14. Rubin GD, Walker PJ, Dake MD et al. Three-dimensional spiral computed tomographic angiography: An alternative imaging modality for the abdominal aorta and its branches. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18: 656-664
15. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC et al. Breath-hold gadolinium- enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197: 785-792
16. Killen DA, Oh SU. Quantitation of the severity of arterial stenosis by pressure gradient measurement. Am Surg 1968; 34: 341-349
17. Nahman NS, Maniam P, Hernandez RA et al. Renal artery pressure gradients in patients with angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 695-699 (Pubitemid 24318928)
18. Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O et al. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: Comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001; 220: 751-756 (Pubitemid 32799986)
19. Eklöf H, Ahlström H, Boström A et al. Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study. Acta Radiol 2005; 46: 802-809 (Pubitemid 43102645)
20. Colyer WR Jr, Cooper CJ, Burket MWet al. Utility of a 0.014" pressure- sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 372-377 (Pubitemid 36792403)
21. Pettersson H. Hydro- and hemodynamic effects of catheterization of vessels. Lund 1976; Doctoral dissertation
22. Serruys PW, Wijns W, Reiber JH et al. Values and limitations of transstenotic pressure gradients measured during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Herz 1985; 10: 337-342 (Pubitemid 16194822)
23. Dash RK, Jayaraman G, Mehta KN. Flow in a catheterized curved artery with stenosis. J Biomech 1999; 32: 49-61 (Pubitemid 29052414)
24. Fearon WF. Physiologic assessment of renal artery stenosis: Will history repeat itself? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1856-1858
25. Myers D, Poole L, Imam K et al. Renal artery stenosis by threedimensional magnetic resonance angiography in type 2 diabetes with uncontrolled hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency: Prevalence and effect of renal function. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 351-359 (Pubitemid 36152453)
26. Krijnen P, van Jaarsveld B, Steyerberg E et al. A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 705-711 (Pubitemid 28507143)
27. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: Suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 2359-2362 (Pubitemid 44300951)
28. Hansen KJ, Edwards MS, Craven TE. Prevalence of renovascular disease in the elderly: A population-based study. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36: 443-451
29. Granerus G, Moonen M. Effects of extra-renal background subtraction and kidney depth correction in the measurement of GFR by gamma camera renography. Nucl Med Commun 1991; 12: 519-527
30. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213-220
31. De Bruyne B, Manoharan G, Pijls NH et al. Assessment of renal artery stenosis severity by pressure gradient measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 7: 1851-1855 (Pubitemid 44648618)
32. Cortsen M, Petersen LJ, Ståhlberg F et al. MR velocity mapping measurement of renal artery blood flow in patients with impaired kidney function. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 79-84 (Pubitemid 126710081)
33. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M et al. Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997; 203: 45-53 (Pubitemid 27142706)
34. Larsson M, Persson A, Eriksson P et al. Renal artery stenosis: Extracting quantitative parameters with a mathematical model fitted to magnetic resonance blood flow data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 140-147
35. Chrysochou C, Kalra PA. Epidemiology and natural history of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 52: 184-195
36. Vaughan ED, Buhler FR, Laragh JH et al. Renovascular hypertension: Renin measurements to indicate hypersecretion and contralateral suppression, estimate renal plasma flow, and score for surgical curability. Am J Med 1973; 55: 402-414
37. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 162-166 (Pubitemid 126702459)
38. Bokor D, Chambers JB, Rees PJ et al. Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 104-109 (Pubitemid 32147857)