Relationship between in utero sonographic evaluation and subcutaneous plicometry after birth in infants with intrauterine growth restriction: An exploratory study

Italian Journal of Pediatrics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Liotto, Nadia ^a   Radaelli, Tatjana ^b,c   Orsi, Anna ^a   Taricco, Emanuela ^c,d   Roggero, Paola ^a   Giann, Maria L ^a   Consonni, Dario ^a   Mosca, Fabio ^a   Cetin, Irene ^c,d  

^a FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; PRENATAL PERIOD; SKINFOLD THICKNESS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; ADULT; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; PREGNANCY; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PREGNANCY; SKINFOLD THICKNESS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; UMBILICAL ARTERIES;

EID: 79952197397     PISSN: 17208424     EISSN: 18247288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-36-70     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Intrauterine growth restriction-genetic causes and consequences. Monk D, Moore GE, Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2004 9 371 378 10.1016/j.siny.2004.03.002 15691772
2. Placental phenotypes of intrauterine growth. Sibley CP, Turner MA, Cetin I, Ayuk P, Boyd CA, D'Souza SW, Glazier JD, Greenwood SL, Jansson T, Powell T, Pediatr Res 2005 58 827 832 10.1203/01.PDR.0000181381.82856.23 16183820 (Pubitemid 41511049)
3. Determinants of intrauterine growth. Sparks JW, Cetin I, In Neonatal Nutrition and Metabolism Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Hay WW Jr, Thureen PJ, 2006 23 31 full-text
4. Evaluation of fetal growth by estimation of neonatal body composition. Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Allen SR, McBean JH, McAuliffe TL, Obstet Gynecol 1992 79 46 50 1727584
5. Evaluation of fetal growth and fetal well-being. Cetin I, Boito S, Radaelli T, Semin Ultrasound 2008 29 136 146 10.1053/j.sult.2008.01.002 (Pubitemid 351381944)
6. Sonographic evaluation of fetal growth and body composition in women with different degrees of normal glucose metabolism. Parretti E, Carignani L, Cioni R, Bartoli E, Borri P, La Torre P, Mecacci F, Martini E, Scarselli G, Mello G, Diabetes Care 2006 26 2741 2748 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2741 (Pubitemid 37205540)
7. Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition. Larciprete G, Valensise H, Di Pierro G, Vasapollo B, Casalino B, Arduini D, Jarvis S, Cirese E, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 26 258 622 10.1002/uog.1980 16116565 (Pubitemid 41545823)
8. Reduction of subcutaneous mass, but not lean mass, in normal fetuses in Denver, Colorado. Galan HL, Rigano S, Radaelli T, Cetin I, Bozzo M, Chyu J, Hobbins JC, Ferrazzi E, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 185 839 844 10.1067/mob.2001.117350 11641662 (Pubitemid 32980522)
9. Differences in fat and lean mass proportions in normal and growth-restricted fetuses. Padoan A, Rigano S, Ferrazzi E, Beaty BL, Battaglia FC, Galan HL, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 191 1459 1464 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.045 15507983 (Pubitemid 39421614)
10. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluationof relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high resolution real-time US. Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV, Radiology 1992 182 501 505 1732970
11. Fitting growth curves to head and abdomen measurements of the fetus: a multicentric study. Todros T, Ferrazzi E, Groli C, Nicolini U, Parodi L, Pavoni M, Zorzoli A, Zucca S, J Clin Ultrasound 1987 15 95 105 10.1002/jcu.1870150203 3134408 (Pubitemid 17004882)
12. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 176 28 32 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80006-3 9024084 (Pubitemid 127780742)
13. Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction. Gardeil F, Greene R, Stuiart B, Turner MJ, Obstet Gynecol 1999 94 209 212 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00270-7 10432129 (Pubitemid 29352863)
14. WHO Child Growth Standards: length/height-for age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index for-age: methods and development. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, Geneva: World Health Organization 2006
15. Revised standards for triceps and subscapular skinfolds in British children. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Arch Dis Child 1975 50 142 145 10.1136/adc.50.2.142 1130819
16. Body composition in neonates: Relationship between measured and derived anthropometry with Dual-Energy X-Ray absorptiometry measurements. Koo WWW, Walters JC, Hockman M, Pediatr Res 2004 56 694 700 10.1203/01.PDR.0000142587. 59238.BD 15371563 (Pubitemid 39403392)
17. Standards for skinfold thickness in British newborn infants. Oakley JR, Parsons RJ, Whitelaw AGL, Arch Dis Child 1977 52 287 290 10.1136/adc.52.4.287 860873 (Pubitemid 8080201)
18. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Lin LI-K, Biometrics 1989 45 255 268 10.2307/2532051 2720055 (Pubitemid 19109172)
19. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Lin L-I-K, (Letter). Biometrics 2000 56 324 325
20. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Bland MJ, Altman DG, Lancet 1986 i 307 310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
21. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Altman DG, Bland JM, The Statistician 1983 32 307 317 10.2307/2987937
22. Assessment of body composition by bioelectrical impedance in children and young adults is strongly age-dependent. Deurenberg P, Kusters CS, Smit HE, Eur J Clin Nutr 1990 44 261 8 2364915 (Pubitemid 20177213)
23. StataCorp Stata: Release 11. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP 2009
24. Use of Serial Ultrasound to Identify Periods of Fetal Growth Restriction in Relation to Neonatal Anthropometry. Anusha H, Hemachandra, Klebanoff MA, Am J Hum Biol 2006 18 791 797 10.1002/ajhb.20552 17039476 (Pubitemid 44718027)
25. Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF, Romero R, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 33 441 446 10.1002/uog.6317 19253324
26. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Hales CN, Barker DJP, Diabetologia 1992 35 595 601 10.1007/BF00400248 1644236
27. In utero programming of chronic disease. Barker DJ, Clin Sci (Lond) 1998 95 115 128 10.1042/CS19980019 9680492 (Pubitemid 28401260)
28. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. Barker DJ, BMJ 1990 301 1111 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1111 2252919 (Pubitemid 20387183)