Public health genomics: The end of the beginning

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 206-209

  Khoury, Muin J ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC SERVICE; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; NOTE; PUBLIC HEALTH;

GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 79952193777     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821024ca     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. 4th National Conference on Genomics and Public Health: using genetic information to improve health now and in the future. Bethesda, MD, December 8-10, 2010. Available at: https://www.cmpinc.net/2010PHGConference/home. html. Accessed January 1 2011
2. Burke W, Burton H, Hall AE, et al. Extending the reach of public health genomics: what should be the agenda for public health in an era of genomebased and "personalized" medicine. Genet Med 2010;12:785-791.
3. Khoury MJ, Bowen MS, Burke W, et al. Current priorities in public health practice in addressing the role of human genomics to improve population health. Am J Prev Med In press.
4. Institute of Medicine. The future of the public's health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences 2002
5. Bloss CS, Ornowski L, Silver E, et al. Consumer perceptions of direct-toconsumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genet Med 2010;12:556-566.
6. Institute of Medicine. Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
7. Institute of Medicine. The future of public health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 1988
8. Khoury MJ, the Genetics Working Group. From genes to public health: the applications of genetic technology in disease prevention. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1717-1722.
9. Beskow LM, Khoury MJ, Baker T, Thrasher JF. The integration of genomics into public health research, policy and practice in the United States. Community Genet 2001;4:2-11. (Pubitemid 32722264)
10. Association for State and Territorial Health Officials. 2010 state public healthgenomicsresource guide. Available at: http://www.astho.org/Programs/ Access/Genomics/Genomics/. Accessed January 1, 2011.
11. Calonge N, Green NS, Rinaldo P, et al. Committee report: method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening for newborns and children. Genet Med 2010;12:153-159.
12. Teutsch SM, Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, et al. The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group. Genet Med 2009;11:3-14.
13. Khoury MJ, McBride CM, Schully SD, et al. The Scientific foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop. Genet Med 2009;11:559-567.
14. Khoury MJ, Feero WG, Reyes M, et al. The Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Network. Genet Med 2009;11:488-494.
15. Burke W, Khoury MJ, Stewart A, Zimmern RL; Bellagio Group. The path from genome-based research to population health: development of an international public health genomics network. Genet Med 2006;8:451-458. (Pubitemid 44289008)
16. Sahai I, Eaton RB, Hale JE, Mulcahy EA, Comeau AM. Long-term follow-up to ensure quality care of individuals diagnosed with newborn screening conditions: early experience with New England. Genet Med 2010; 12(suppl 12):S220-S227.
17. Faucett WA, Hart S, Pagon RA, Neall LF, Spinella G. A model program to increase translation of rare disease genetic tests: collaboration, education and test translation program. Genet Med 2008;10:343-348. (Pubitemid 351770404)
18. Kemper AR, Trotter TL, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Kyler P, Feero WG, Howell RR. A blueprint for maternal and child health primary care physician education in medical genetics and genomic medicine: recommendations of the United States secretary for health and human services advisory committee on heritable diseases in newborns and children. Genet Med 2010;12:77-80.
19. Scheuner MT, McNeel TS, Freedman AN. Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California Health Interview Survey. Genet Med 2010;12:726-735.
20. Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al. Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010;12:808-815.
21. Collins RE, Wright AJ, Marteau TM. Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: a systematic review [published online ahead of print October 1, 2010]. Genet Med doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f710ca
22. Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE. The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 2010;12:93-104.
23. Shields AE, Burke W, Levy DE. Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey. Genet Med 2008;10:404-414.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Knowledge Base (GAPPKb). Available at: http:// www.hugenavigator.net/GAPPKB/home.do. Accessed January 1, 2011.