SUMOylation promotes de novo targeting of HP1 ± to pericentric heterochromatin

Nature Genetics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 220-227

  Maison, Christèle ^a,b   Bailly, Delphine ^a,b   Roche, Danièle ^a,b   De Oca, Rocio Montes ^a,b   Probst, Aline V ^a,b,d   Vassias, Isabelle ^a,b   Dingli, Florent ^a,c   Lombard, Bérengère ^a,c   Loew, Damarys ^a,c   Quivy, Jean Pierre ^a,b   Almouzni, Geneviève ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c Laboratory of Proteomic Mass Spectrometry   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1; SUMO 1 PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE LOCATION; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HETEROCHROMATIN; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PERICENTRIC HETEROCHROMATIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; SUMOYLATION;

EID: 79952189085     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.765     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Grewal, S.I. & Jia, S. Heterochromatin revisited. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 35-46 (2007). (Pubitemid 46006048)
2. Guenatri, M., Bailly, D., Maison, C. & Almouzni, G. Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 166, 493-505 (2004). (Pubitemid 39097169)
3. Probst, A.V., Dunleavy, E. & Almouzni, G. Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 192-206 (2009).
4. Bannister, A.J. et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410, 120-124 (2001). (Pubitemid 32225848)
5. Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. & Jenuwein, T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116-120 (2001). (Pubitemid 32225847)
6. Strahl, B.D. & Allis, C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41-45 (2000). (Pubitemid 30038513)
7. Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C.D. Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074-1080 (2001). (Pubitemid 32758077)
8. Peng, H., Ivanov, A.V., Oh, H.J., Lau, Y.F. & Rauscher, F.J. 3rd. Epigenetic gene silencing by the SRY protein is mediated by a KRAB-O protein which recruits the KAP1 co-repressor machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35670-35680 (2009).
9. Quivy, J.P. et al. A CAF-1 dependent pool of HP1 during heterochromatin duplication. EMBO J. 23, 3516-3526 (2004).
10. Lomberk, G., Bensi, D., Fernandez-Zapico, M.E. & Urrutia, R. Evidence for the existence of an HP1-mediated subcode within the histone code. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 407-415 (2006).
11. Maison, C. et al. Higher-order structure in pericentric heterochromatin involves a distinct pattern of histone modification and an RNA component. Nat. Genet. 30, 329-334 (2002).
12. Muchardt, C. et al. Coordinated methyl and RNA binding is required for heterochromatin localization of mammalian HP1alpha. EMBO Rep. 3, 975-981 (2002). (Pubitemid 35256472)
13. Rudert, F., Bronner, S., Garnier, J.M. & Dolle, P. Transcripts from opposite strands of gamma satellite DNA are differentially expressed during mouse development. Mamm. Genome 6, 76-83 (1995).
14. Lu, J. & Gilbert, D.M. Proliferation-dependent and cell cycle regulated transcription of mouse pericentric heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 179, 411-421 (2007). (Pubitemid 350074787)
15. Kalitsis, P. & Choo, K.H.A. Centromere DNA of higher eukaryotes. in The Centromere (ed. Choo, K.H.A.) 97-140 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
16. Heard, E. & Bickmore, W. The ins and outs of gene regulation and chromosome territory organisation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 311-316 (2007). (Pubitemid 46899518)
17. Deng, Z., Norseen, J., Wiedmer, A., Riethman, H. & Lieberman, P.M. TERRA RNA binding to TRF2 facilitates heterochromatin formation and ORC recruitment at telomeres. Mol. Cell 35, 403-413 (2009).
18. Wang, Q., Zhang, Z., Blackwell, K. & Carmichael, G.G. Vigilins bind to promiscuously A-to-I-edited RNAs and are involved in the formation of heterochromatin. Curr. Biol. 15, 384-391 (2005). (Pubitemid 40263374)
19. Kuroda, M.I., Kernan, M.J., Kreber, R., Ganetzky, B. & Baker, B.S. The maleless protein associates with the X chromosome to regulate dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell 66, 935-947 (1991). (Pubitemid 121001727)
20. Irvine, K., Stirling, R., Hume, D. & Kennedy, D. Rasputin, more promiscuous than ever: a review of G3BP. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48, 1065-1077 (2004). (Pubitemid 40179573)
21. Shin, J.A. et al. SUMO modification is involved in the maintenance of heterochromatin stability in fission yeast. Mol. Cell 19, 817-828 (2005). (Pubitemid 41316675)
22. Aagaard, L. et al. Functional mammalian homologues of the Drosophila PEV- modifier Su(Var)3-9 encode centromere-associated proteins which complex with the heterochromatin component M31. EMBO J. 18, 1923-1938 (1999). (Pubitemid 29158536)
23. Hay, R.T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell 18, 1-12 (2005). (Pubitemid 40444643)
24. Meulmeester, E. & Melchior, F. Cell biology: SUMO. Nature 452, 709-711 (2008). (Pubitemid 351521073)
25. Park-Sarge, O.K. & Sarge, K.D. Detection of SUMOylated proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 464, 255-265 (2009).
26. Jakobs, A. et al. Ubc9 fusion-directed SUMOylation (UFDS): a method to analyze function of protein SUMOylation. Nat. Methods 4, 245-250 (2007). (Pubitemid 46358875)
27. Peters, A.H. et al. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107, 323-337 (2001). (Pubitemid 33049976)
28. Loyola, A., Bonaldi, T., Roche, D., Imhof, A. & Almouzni, G. PTMs on H3 variants before chromatin assembly potentiate their final epigenetic state. Mol. Cell 24, 309-316 (2006). (Pubitemid 44557123)
29. Smothers, J.F. & Henikoff, S. The hinge and chromoshadow domain impart distinct targeting of HP1-like proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2555-2569 (2001). (Pubitemid 32222107)
30. Kerscher, O. SUMO junction-what's your function? New insights through SUMO-interacting motifs. EMBO Rep. 8, 550-555 (2007). (Pubitemid 47214708)
31. Ouyang, J., Shi, Y., Valin, A., Xuan, Y. & Gill, G. Direct binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 contributes to gene-specific repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC complex. Mol. Cell 34, 145-154 (2009).
32. Allshire, R.C. & Karpen, G.H. Epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin: old dogs, new tricks? Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 923-937 (2008). (Pubitemid 50329068)
33. Moazed, D. Small RNAs in transcriptional gene silencing and genome defence. Nature 457, 413-420 (2009).
34. Blankenship, J.T. & Wieschaus, E. Two new roles for the Drosophila AP patterning system in early morphogenesis. Development 128, 5129-5138 (2001). (Pubitemid 34083038)
35. Kanellopoulou, C. et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 19, 489-501 (2005). (Pubitemid 40256280)
36. Murchison, E.P., Partridge, J.F., Tam, O.H., Cheloufi, S. & Hannon, G.J. Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12135-12140 (2005). (Pubitemid 41291141)
37. Tsai, M.C. et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science 329, 689-693 (2010).
38. Savarese, F., Flahndorfer, K., Jaenisch, R., Busslinger, M. & Wutz, A. Hematopoietic precursor cells transiently reestablish permissiveness for X inactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 7167-7177 (2006). (Pubitemid 44477693)
39. Agrelo, R. et al. SATB1 defines the developmental context for gene silencing by Xist in lymphoma and embryonic cells. Dev. Cell 16, 507-516 (2009).
40. Santos, F., Peters, A.H., Otte, A.P., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 280, 225-236 (2005). (Pubitemid 40342755)
41. Puschendorf, M. et al. PRC1 and Suv39h specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nat. Genet. 40, 411-420 (2008). (Pubitemid 351450889)
42. Probst, A.V. et al. A strand-specific burst in transcription of pericentric satellites is required for chromocenter formation and early mouse development. Dev. Cell 19, 625-638 (2010).
43. Haaf, T. & Ward, D.C. Higher order nuclear structure in mammalian sperm revealed by in situ hybridization and extended chromatin fibers. Exp. Cell Res. 219, 604-611 (1995).
44. Mayer, R. et al. Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse. BMC Cell Biol. 6, 44 (2005).
45. Terranova, R., Sauer, S., Merkenschlager, M. & Fisher, A.G. The reorganisation of constitutive heterochromatin in differentiating muscle requires HDAC activity. Exp. Cell Res. 310, 344-356 (2005). (Pubitemid 41457339)
46. Hajkova, P. et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature 452, 877-881 (2008). (Pubitemid 351550855)
47. Solovei, I. et al. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137, 356-368 (2009).
48. Narita, M. et al. Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 113, 703-716 (2003). (Pubitemid 36724935)