Parametric fractional imputation for missing data analysis

Biometrika

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 119-132

  Kim, Jae Kwang ^a  

^a E005A Lagomarcino Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

em algorithm; Importance sampling; Item nonresponse; Monte Carlo EM; Multiple imputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952165896     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asq073     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BOOTH, J. G. & HOBERT, J. P. (1999). Maximizing generalized linear models with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 61, 625-85.
2. CLAYTON, D., SPIEGELHALTER, D., DUNN, G. & PICKLES, A. (1998). Analysis of longitudinal binary data from multiphase sampling. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 60, 71-87. (Pubitemid 128656494)
3. DEMPSTER, A. P., LAIRD, N. M. & RUBIN, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 39, 1-37.
4. FAY, R. E. (1992). When are inferences from multiple imputation valid? In Proc. Survey Res. Meth. Sect. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
5. FAY, R. E. (1996). Alternative paradigms for the analysis of imputed survey data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 91, 490-8.
6. GELMAN, A.,MENG, X. L. & STERN, H. (1996). Posterior predictice assessmemt of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion). Statist. Sinica 6, 733-807. (Pubitemid 126706389)
7. IBRAHIM, J. G. (1990). Incomplete data in generalized linear models. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 85, 765-9.
8. KIM, J. K., BRICK, M. J., FULLER, W. A. & KALTON, G. (2006). On the bias of the multiple imputation variance estimator in survey sampling. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 68, 509-21. (Pubitemid 43742896)
9. KIM, J. K. & FULLER, W. (2004). Fractional hot deck imputation. Biometrika 91, 559-78. (Pubitemid 41309893)
10. KIM, J. K. & RAO, J. N. K. (2009). Unified approach to linearization variance estimation from survey data after imputation for item nonresponse. Biometrika 96, 917-32.
11. LOUIS, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 44, 226-33.
12. MENG, X. L. (1994). Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (with discussion). Statist. Sci. 9, 538-73.
13. RANDLES, R. H. (1982). On the asymptotic normality of statistics with estimated parameters. Ann. Statist. 10, 462-74.
14. ROBINS, J. M. & WANG, N. (2000). Inference for imputation estimators. Biometrika 87, 113-24.
15. RUBIN, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63, 581-90.
16. RUBIN, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley.
17. SUNG, Y. J. & GEYER, C. J. (2007). Monte Carlo likelihood inference for missing data models. Ann. Statist. 35, 990-1011.
18. WANG, N. & ROBINS, J. M. (1998). Large-sample theory for parametric multiple imputation procedures. Biometrika 85, 935-48.
19. WEI, G. C. & TANNER, M. A. (1990). A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man's data augmentation algorithms. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 85, 699-704.
20. WU, C. F. J. (1983). On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm. Ann. Statist. 11, 95-103.