Long-term effects of neonatal damage to the hippocampal formation and amygdaloid complex on object discrimination and object recognition in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1127-1151

  Bachevalier, Jocelyne ^a,b   Beauregard, Mario ^a,b,c   Alvarado, Maria C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNESIA; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; NONHUMAN; RECOGNITION; RHESUS MONKEY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0033372440     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.113.6.1127     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alvarez, P., Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R. (1995). Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3796-3807.
2. Bachevalier, J. (1994). Medial temporal lobe structures and autism: A review of clinical and experimental findings. Neuropsychologia, 32, 627-648.
3. Bachevalier, J., Alvarado, M. C., & Malkova, L. (1999). Memory and socioemotional behavior in monkeys after hippocampal damage incurred in infancy or in adulthood. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 329-339.
4. Bachevalier, J., Brickson, M., Hagger, C., & Mishkin, M. (1990). Age and sex differences in the effects of selective temporal lobe lesion on the formation of visual discrimination habits in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 885-899.
5. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1984). An early and a late developing system for learning and retention in infant monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 770-778.
6. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1989). Mnemonic and neuropathological effects of occluding the posterior cerebral artery in Macaca mulatta. Neuropsychologia, 27, 83-105.
7. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1991). Effects of neonatal lesions of the amygdaloid complex or hippocampal formation on the development of visual recognition memory. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 338.
8. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1994). Effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2128-2139.
9. Baxter, M. G., Saunders, R. C., & Murray, E. A. (1998). Aspiration lesions of the amygdala interrupt connections between prefrontal cortex and temporal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 1905.
10. Beauregard, M., & Bachevalier, J. (1993). Long-term effects of neonatal hippocampal lesions on visual recognition memory. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 19, 1004.
11. Buckley, M. B., & Gaffan, D. (1997). Visual object discrimination learning is impaired following perirhinal cortex ablation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 467-475.
12. Buckley, M. B., & Gaffan, D. (1998). Learning and transfer of object-reward associations and the role of the perirhinal cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 15-23.
13. Gaffan, D., & Murray, E. A. (1992). Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail matching to sample despite double sample presentations. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 30-38.
14. Gaffan, D., Murray, E. A., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (1993). Interaction of the amygdala with the frontal lobe in reward memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 968-975.
15. George, P. J., Horel, J. A., & Cirillo, R. A. (1989). Reversible cold lesions of the parahippocampal gyrus in monkeys result in deficits on the delayed matching-to-sample and other visual tasks. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 163-178.
16. Goldman, P. S. (1971). Functional development of the prefrontal cortex in early life and the problem of neuronal plasticity. Experimental Neurology, 32, 266-287.
17. Goldman, P. S. (1974). An alternative to development plasticity: Heterology of CNS structures in infants and adults. In D. G. Stein, J. J. Rosen, & N. Butters (Eds.), Plasticity and recovery of function in the central nervous system (pp. 149-174). New York: Academic Press.
18. Goulet, S., Doré, F., & Murray, E. A. (1998). Aspiration lesions of the amygdala disrupt the rhinal corticothalamic projection system in rhesus monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 131-140.
19. Hodos, W., & Bobko, P. (1984). A weighted index of bilateral brain lesions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 12, 43-47.
20. Mahut, M., & Killiany, R. (1990). Ontogeny of object-reward association learning and trial-unique object recognition: Effects of early hippocampectomy on the two capacities in rhesus macaques. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 16, 847.
21. Mahut, H., & Moss, M. (1984). Consolidation of memory: The hippocampus revisited. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 297-315). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Mahut, H., & Moss, M. (1986). The monkey and the sea horse. In R. L. Isaacson & K. L. Pribram (Eds.), The hippocampus (Vol. 4, pp. 241-279). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Malamut, B. L., Saunders, R. C., & Mishkin, M. (1984). Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 759-769.
24. Malkova, L., Gaffan, D., & Murray, E. A. (1997). Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 6011-6020.
25. Malkova, L., Mishkin, M., & Bachevalier, J. (1995). Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 212-226.
26. Malkova, L., Mishkin, M., Suomi, S. J., & Bachevalier, J. (1997). Socioemotional behavior in adult rhesus monkeys after early versus late lesions of the medial temporal lobe. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 807, The Integrative Neurobiology of Affiliation (pp. 538-540). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
27. Meunier, M., Bachevalier, J., Mishkin, M., & Murray, E. A. (1995). Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 5418-5432.
28. Mishkin, M. (1978). Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not separate removal of the amygdala and hippocampus. Nature, 273, 297-298.
29. Mishkin, M., & Murray, E. A. (1996). Stimulus recognition. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 4, 200-206.
30. Murray, E. A. (1992). Medial temporal lobe structures contributing to recognition memory: The amygdaloid complex versus the rhinal complex. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 453-470). New York: Wiley.
31. Murray, E. A. (1996). What have ablation studies told us about the neural substrates of stimulus recognition? Seminars in Neuroscience, 8, 13-22.
32. Murray, E. A., Gaffan, D., & Mishkin, M. (1993). Neural substrates of visual stimulus-stimulus association in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4549-4561.
33. Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1998). Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6568-6582.
34. Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (in press). Nonselective neonatal hippocampal lesions impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus.
35. Phillips, R. R., Malamut, B., Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1988). Dissociation of the effects of the inferior temporal and limbic lesions on object discrimination learning with 24-hr intertrial intervals. Behavioural Brain Research, 27, 99-107.
36. Rehbein, L., Zola-Morgan, S., Mahut, H., & Moss, M. (1980). Failure of sparing, or recovery, of recognition memory after early hippocampal resections in the rhesus macaque. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 6, 88.
37. Rolls, E. T., Burton, M. J., & Mora, F. (1976). Hypothalamic neuronal responses associated with the sight of food. Brain Research, 111, 53-66.
38. Rothblat, L. A., Vnek, N., Gleason, T. C., & Kromer, L. F. (1993). Role of the parahippocampal region in spatial and non-spatial memory: Effects of parahippocampal lesions on rewarded alternation and concurrent object discrimination learning in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research, 55, 93-100.
39. Ruppenthal, G. C., Walker, C. G., & Sackett, G. P. (1991). Rearing infant monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) in pairs produces deficient social development compared with rearing in single cages. American Journal of Primatology, 25, 103-113.
40. Saunders, R. C., Aigner, T. G., & Frank, J. A. (1990). Magnetic resonance imaging of the rhesus monkey brain: Use for stereotactic neurosurgery. Experimental Brain Research, 81, 443-446.
41. Schneider, G. E. (1979). Is it really better to have your brain lesion early? A revision of the "Kennard principle." Neuropsychologia, 17, 557-583.
42. Sigma Scan (Version 3.1) [Computer software]. (1995). Chicago: Jandel Scientific.
43. Suzuki, W. A., Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., & Amaral, D. G. (1993). Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactile modalities. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 2430-2451.
44. Thompson, C. I. (1981). Long-term behavioral development of rhesus monkeys after amygdalectomy. In Y. Ben Ari (Ed.), The amygdala complex (INSERM Symposium 20, pp. 259-270). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland Biomedical Press.
45. Thompson, C. I., & Towfighi, J. T. (1976). Social behavior in juvenile rhesus monkeys after amygdalectomy in infancy. Physiology and Behavior, 17, 831-836.
46. von Bonin, G., & Bailey, P. (1947). The neocortex of Macaca mulatta. Urbana: University of Illinois.
47. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Alvarez-Royo, P., & Clower, R. P. (1991). Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: Separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala. Hippocampus, 1, 207-220.
48. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., & Amaral, D. G. (1989). Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1922-1936.
49. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Amaral, D. G., & Suzuki, W. A. (1989). Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 4355-4370.
50. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Rempel, N. L., Clower, R. P., & Amaral, D. G. (1992). Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 2582-2596.