Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems;Zur zufriedenheit und nutzung von hausnotrufsystemen

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 219-223

  Heinbuchner B ^a   Hautzinger, M ^a   Becker, C ^b   Pfeiffer, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b ROBERT BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accidental falls; Consumer satisfaction; Emergency; Home alarm system; Personal emergency response system

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FALLING; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERMANY; HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; AGED; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERMANY; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 79952117715     PISSN: 09486704     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00391-010-0127-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Avlund K, Kreiner S, Schulz-Larsen K (1996) Functional ability scales for the elderly. A validation study. Eur J Public Health 6:35-42
2. Bernstein M (2000) Low-tech personal emergency response systems reduce costs and improve outcomes. Manag Care Q 8:38-43
3. Bundesverband Hausnotruf (2010) http\\:www.bv-hausnotruf.de, cited April 29, 2010
4. Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL et al (2002) Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subject for clinical research. Med Care 40:771-781
5. Celler B, Lovell NH, Chan DK (1999) The potential impact of home telecare on clinical practice. Med J Aust 171:518-521
6. Constien J, Wetzel E (2002) Hausnotruf ermöglicht mehr Sicherheit zu Hause. Pro Alter 1:60-65
7. Crocker L, Algina J (1986) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rhinehart, Winston, New York
8. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13:319-339
9. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B (1996) Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol 8:3-13
10. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B (2000) Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol 12:96-105
11. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B (2000) Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology: QUEST version 2.0. The Institute for Matching Person & Technoloy, Inc., Webster, USA
12. Dibner AS (1990) Personal emergency response systems: communication technology aids elderly and their families. J Appl Genet 9:504-510
13. Doughty K, Cameron K, Garner P (1996) Three generations of telecare of the elderly. J Telemed Telecare 2:71-80
14. Fallis WM, Silverthorne D, Franklin J et al (2007) Client and responder perceptions of a personal emergency response system: Lifeline. Home Health Care Serv Q. 26:1-21
15. Fleming J, Brayne C (2008) Inability to get up after falling, subsequent time on floor and summoning help: prospective cohort study in people over 90. BMJ 337:a2227
16. Gitlin L, Schemm R, Landsberg L et al (1996) Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. J aging health 8:554-575
17. Hoyl MT, Alessi CA, Harker JO et al (1999) Development and testing of a five items version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:873-878
18. Levine DA, Tideiksaar R (1995) Personal emergency response systems: factors associated with use among older persons. Mt Sinai J Med 62:293-297
19. Mann W, Goodall S, Justiss MD et al (2002) Dissatisfaction and Non-use of Assistive Devices among frail elders. Assist Technol 14:130-139
20. Mann WC, Belchior P, Tomita MR et al (2005) Use of personal emergency response systems by older individuals with disabilities. Assist Technol 17:82-88
21. Marx J (2006) Fünfundzwanzig Jahre DRK-Hausnotruf. Eine Dokumentation. Deutsches Rotes Kreuz Generalsekretariat
22. Oliver R (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mol Recognit 17:460-469
23. Roman K (2002) Technik im Alltag von Senioren. Arbeitsbericht zu vertiefenden Auswertungen der sentha - Repräsentativerhebung. Teilprojekt Sozialwissenschaften (DZFA, BIS) der interdisziplinären Forschergruppe sentha, Heidelberg
24. Roush RE, Teasdale TA (1995) Impact of a personal emergency response system on hospital utilization by community-residing elders. South Med J 88:917-922
25. Ruchlin HS, Morris JN (1981) Cost-benefit analysis of an emergency alarm and response system: a case study of a long-term care program. Health Serv Res 16:65-80
26. Sherwood S, Morris JN (1980) A study of the effects of an emergency alarm and response system for the aged: a final report. Grant No. HS01788, National Center for Health Services Research
27. Spreng RA, MacKenzie SB, Olshavsky RW (1996) A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. JM 60:15-32
28. Szajna B (1996) Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manage Sci 42:85-92
29. Vincent C, Reinharz D, Deaudelin I et al (2006) Public telesurveillance service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and cost evolution: a quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:4-41
30. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A Theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. ISR 16:85-102