Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system

Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1203-1211

  Miura, Kazutomo ^a   Ishibashi, Yasuyuki ^a   Tsuda, Eiichi ^a   Fukuda, Akira ^a   Tsukada, Harehiko ^a   Toh, Satoshi ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT LAXITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; MALE; ORTHOPILOT ACL SYSTEM; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTHROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; INJURY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROTATION; TENDON; TORQUE; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTHROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; TENDONS; TORQUE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952115439     PISSN: 07498063     EISSN: 15263231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R. ACL reconstruction: A meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;458:180-187. (Pubitemid 46701375)
2. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 2005;21:791-803. (Pubitemid 40984668)
3. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:629-634. (Pubitemid 38509009)
4. Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus singlebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1675-1687.
5. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2007;23:618-628. (Pubitemid 46873910)
6. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S. Future of double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: Incorporation of ACL anatomic data into the navigation system. Orthopedics 2006;29:S108-S112 (Suppl). (Pubitemid 44680396)
7. Koh J, Koo SS, Leonard J, Kodali P. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel placement: A radiographic comparison between navigated versus manual ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2006;29:S122-S124 (Suppl). (Pubitemid 44680399)
8. Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S. Validation of computer-assisted double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 2007;30:S136-S140. (Pubitemid 350032721)
9. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada A, Toh S. Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2008;16:77-83.
10. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada A, Toh S. Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system: Comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1903-1912.
11. Howell SM. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6:S49-S55 (Suppl 1).
12. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 2004;20:1015-1025. (Pubitemid 39600658)
13. Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL-Y, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 1997;15:285-293. (Pubitemid 27220548)
14. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:660-666.
15. Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL-Y, Van Scyoc AH, Takakura Y, Debski RE. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of a lateral and an anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1825-1832. (Pubitemid 39551859)
16. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Tazawa K, Satoh H, Toh S. Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. Orthopedics 2005;28:1277-1282.
17. Eichhorn J. Three years of experience with computer navigation- assisted positioning of drilling tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Arthroscopy 2004;20:e31-e32 (Suppl 1). Available online at www. arthroscopyjournal.org.
18. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: A comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:542-552.
19. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada A, Toh S. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is the posterolateral bundle more important? Arthroscopy 2009;25: 488-495.
20. Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Marcacci M. Description and validation of a navigation system for intraoperative evaluation of knee laxity. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12:181-188. (Pubitemid 46868268)
21. Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, et al. Reliability of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of anteroposterior knee joint laxity. Comput Biol Med 2009;39:280-285.
22. Monaco E, Labianca L, Maestri B, De Carli A, Conteduca F, Ferretti A. Instrumented measurements of knee laxity: KT- 1000 versus navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:617-621.
23. Markolf KL, Burchfield DM, Sharpiro MS, Davis BR, Finerman GAM, Slauterbeck JL. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I. Insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1720-1727.
24. Markolf KL, Park S, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Anteriorposterior and rotator stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:107-118.
25. Mae T, Shino K, Matsumoto N, Hamada M, Yoneda M, Nakata K. Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg's isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: A biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:328-334.
26. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Hur CI, Lee DS. In vivo laxity of stable versus anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees using a navigation system: A comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:941-945.
27. Ho JY, Gardiner A, Shah V, Steiner ME. Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2009; 25:464-472.
28. Otsuka H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Sasaki K, Toh S. Comparison of three techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: Differences in anterior tibial translation and tunnel enlargement with each technique. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:282-288. (Pubitemid 36343337)