Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel placement: A radiographic comparison between navigated versus manual ACL reconstruction

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Koh, Jason ^a   Koo, Samuel S ^a   Leonard, James ^a   Kodali, Pradeep ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LIGAMENT SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTHROSCOPY; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 33750585813     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AOSSM initiates multi-center ACL revision study. In: Malaya MJ, Boden BP, eds. AOSSM Sports Medicine Update Match-April. 2005:5. Available at: http://www.sportsmed.org/sml/esmu/march-april%202005/css/ smu(mar-apr05)_5.htm.
2. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 8:141-150.
3. Eichhorn J, Girdano N. Computerassistierte Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem Navigations system. Arthroskopie. 2005; 18:24-26.
4. Sati M, Bourquin Y, Staubli HU, Nolte LP. Considering anatomic and functional factors in ACL reconstruction: new technology. In: Abstracts of the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery; June 15-17, 2000; Pittsburgh, Pa.
5. Getelman MH, Friedman MJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999; 7:189-198.
6. Sommer C, Friederich NF, Muller W. Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8:207-213.
7. Dessenne V, Lavallee S, Julliard R, et al. Computer assisted knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: first clinical tests. J Image Guid Surg. 1995; 1:59-64.
8. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, et al. Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 354:65-69.
9. Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciale ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998; 6: S2-S12.
10. Fineberg MS, Zarins B, Sherman OH. Practical considerations in ACL replacement surgery. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16:715-724.
11. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, et al. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24:335-341.
12. Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75:1044-1055.
13. Muneta T, Yamamoto H, Ishibashi T, et al. The effects of tibial tunnel placement and roofplasty on reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament knees. Arthroscopy. 1995; 11:57-62.
14. Carson EW, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47:361-368.
15. Ikeda H, Muneta T, Niga S, et al. The long-term effects of tibial drill hole position on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15:287-291.
16. Yaru NC, Daniel DM, Penner D. The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20:217-220.
17. Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, Giron F, Aglietti P. The relationship between the intercondylar roof and the tibial plateau with the knee in extension: relevance for tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15:625-631.
18. Eriksson E. How good are the results of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997; 5:137.
19. Kohn D, Busche T, Carls J. Drill hole position in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Results of an advanced arthroscopy course. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998; 6:S13-S15.
20. Sommer CH, Friederich NF, Muller W. Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8:207-213.
21. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Moody J, et al. Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6:279-289.
22. Sudhahar TA, Glasgow MM, Donell ST. Comparison of expected vs. actual tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2004; 11:15-18.
23. Julliard R, Lavallee S, Dessenne V. Computer-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 354:57-64.
24. Degenhart M. Computer-navigated ACL reconstruction with the Orthopilot. Surg Technol Int. 2004; 12:245-251.
25. Eichhorn J. Three years of experience with computer navigation-assisted positioning of drilling tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament replacement (SS-67). Arthroscopy 2004; 20:31-32.
26. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation. A comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34:542-552.
27. Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Kuenzel KH, Fink C. Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13:256-262,
28. Cole J, Brand JC, Caborn DN, Johnson DL. Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 2000; 13:218-222.