Performance improvement in addiction treatment: Efforts in california

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 42, Issue , 2010, Pages 261-268

  Herbeck, Diane M ^a   Gonzales, Rachel ^a   Rawson, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction treatment; Performance measurement; System improvement

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 79952111166     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2010.10400549     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Aarons, G.A. 2004. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research 6 (20): 61-74.
2. Bodenheimer, T.; Wagner, E.H. & Grumbach, K. 2002. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Journal oftheAmerican Medical Association 288 (14): 1775-79.
3. Durman, J.; Lucking, T. & Robertson, L. 2008. Performance Management for Substance Abuse Treatment Providers. Rockville, Center for
4. Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
5. Grick, D.W.; Lee, M.T.; Horgan, C.M. & Acevedo, A. 2009. Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 36: 265-77.
6. Garnick, D.W.; Horgan, C.M. & Chalk, M. 2006. Performance measures for alcohol and other drug services. Alcohol Research and Health 29: 9-27.
7. Kaskutas, L.A.; Greenfield, T.; Borkman, T.J. & Room, J.A. 1998. Measuring treatment philosophy: A scale for substance abuse recovery programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 (I): 27-36.
8. Lefkovitz, P.M.; Ford, J.; Vaughn, B. & Nance, R. 2009. Promoting benchmarking in addiction treatment. Behavioral Healthcare 29 (4): 28-30.
9. Lin, M.K.; Marsteller, J.; Shortell, S.; Mendel, P.; Pearson, M.; Rosen, M. & Wu, S.Y. 2005. Motivation to change chronic illness care: Results from a national evaluation of quality improvement collaboratives. Health Care Management Review 30 (2): 139-56.
10. McCarty, D.; Capoccia, V.A.; Gustafson, D. & Cotter, F. 2009. Improving care for the treatment of alcohol and drug disorders. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 36: 52-60.
11. McCarty, D.; Gustafson, D.H.; Wisdom, J.P.; Ford, J.; Choi, D.; Molfenter, T.; Capoccia, V. & Cotter, F. 2007. The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx): Enhancing access and retention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 88: 138-45.
12. Rawson, R.A.; Gonzales, R.; Brecht, M.L.; Crèvecoeur-MacPhail, D. & Hemberg, J. 2008. Evaluation of the California Outcomes Measurement System (CalOMS) Final Report. University of California, Los Angeles, Integrated Substance Abuse Programs. Available at http://www.adp.state.ca.us/oara/pdf/CalOMS_Final_ Report_2008.pdf.
13. Wisdom, J.P.; Ford, II J.H.; Hayes, R.A.; Edmundson, E.; Hoffman, K. & McCarty, D. 2006. Addiction treatment agencies’ use of data: A qualitative assessment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research 33 (4): 394-407.