Modeling aquifer-river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain)

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 475-487

  Sanz, David ^a   Castaño, Santiago ^a   Cassiraga, Eduardo ^b   Sahuquillo, Andrés ^b   Gómez Alday, Juan José ^a   Peña, Salvador ^b   Calera, Alfonso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Groundwater abstraction; Groundwater surface water relations; MODFLOW; Numerical modeling; Spain

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PUMPING; RESOURCE DEPLETION; RIVER; RIVER DISCHARGE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WATER LEVEL; WATER STORAGE;

JUCAR BASIN; SPAIN;

EID: 79952095859     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-010-0694-x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Calera A, Medrano J, Vela A, Castaño S (1999) GIS tools applied to the sustainable management of hydric resources: application to the aquifer system 08-29. Agric Water Manage 40: 207-220.
2. Calver A (2001) Riverbed permeabilities: information from pooled data. Ground Water 39: 546-555.
3. Castaño S, Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ (2009) Methodology for quantifying groundwater abstractions for agriculture via remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manage 24: 795-814.
4. DGOH (1988) Estudio de la explotación de aguas subterráneas en el acuífero de la Mancha Oriental y su influencia sobre los caudales del río Júcar [Study of the exploitation of groundwater in the Mancha Oriental Aquifer and its influence of the Jucar river flow]. DGOH, Madrid.
5. DGOH (1993) Estudio de seguimiento de impacto de las extracciones de aguas subterráneas en los acuíferos de la Mancha Oriental y los caudales del río Júcar. Masrid [Monitoring study of the impact of groundwater abstractions on Mancha Oriental Aquifer and Jucar river flow]. DGOH, Madrid.
6. Doherty J (2004) PEST model-independent parameter estimation users manual. Watermark, Brisbane, Australia.
7. Estrela T (2004) Jucar Pilot River Basin: provisional article 5 report pursuant to the Water Framework Directive. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Valencia, Spain Available via http://www. phjucar. com/docs/otros_docs/Article_5_complete. pdf. Cited 09 November 2010.
8. Fernández-Sanchez JA, Lucena Bonny C, Tapia Granados F (1983) Descripción y resultados del modelo matemático del acuífero de Albacete [Description and results of mathematical modelling of the aquifers in Albacete]. III Simposio de Hidrogeología, IGME, Madrid, pp 125-131.
9. Fleckenstein JH, Suzuki E, Fogg G (2001) Options for conjunctive water management to restore fall flows in the Consumnes River basin, California. In: Mariño MA, Simnovic SP (eds) Integrated water resources management. IAHS publication 272, IAHS, Wallingford, UK, pp 175-182.
10. Fleckenstein JH, Anderson M, Fogg G, Mount J (2004) Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(4): 301-310.
11. Fleckenstein JH, Niswonger RG, Fogg G (2006) River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Ground Water 44: 837-852.
12. Font E (2004) Colaboración y desarrollo de un modelo matemático distribuido de flujo subterráneo de la Unidad Hidrogeológica 08. 29 Mancha Oriental en las provincias de Albacete, Cuenca y Valencia [Collaboration and development of a distributed mathematical model of groundwater flow in the hydrogeological unit 08. 29, Eastern Mancha in Albacete, Cuenca and Valencia provinces]. MSc Thesis, Polytechnical University of Valencia, Spain. http://www. chj. es/medioambiente/planificacionhidrologica/Documents/Mejora%20del%20Conoc imiento/MEMORIAPFCOPH. pdf. Cited 09 November 2010.
13. Gorelick SM (eds) (1986) Conjunctive water use: understanding and managing surfacewater-groundwater interactions. IAHS publication no. 156, IAHS, Wallingford, UK.
14. Hamm SY, Cheong JY, Kim HS (2005) Comparing inversion and trial-and-error methods to determine optimum yield at a riverbank filtration site, Korea. Salt Lake City Annual Meeting. Geol Soc Am Abst 37(7)1-66.
15. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, The U. S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model-User guide to modularization concepts and the groundwater flow process. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 00-92, 121 pp.
16. IGME (1980) El sistema hidrogeológico de Albacete (Mancha Oriental): sus recursos en aguas subterráneas, utilización actual y posibilidades futuras [The Albacete hydrogeological system (Mancha Oriental): groundwater resources, actual uses and future scope]. IGME, Madrid.
17. IGME (2006) Modelo Matemático de flujo de la Unidad Hidrogeológica 08. 29, Mancha Oriental [Mathematical modeling of flow of the hydrogeological unit 08. 29, eastern Mancha]. IGME, Madrid.
18. Jagelke J, Barthel R (2005) Conceptualization and implementation of a regional groundwater model for the Neckar catchment in the framework of an integrated regional model. ADGEO 5: 105-111.
19. Langhoff JH, Rasmussen KR, Christensen S (2006) Quantification and regionalization of groundwater-surface water interaction along an alluvial stream. J Hydrol 320: 342-358.
20. Martínez-Santos P, Llamas MR, Martínez-Alfaro P (2008) Vulnerability assessment of groundwater resources: a modelling-based approach to the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environ Modell Softw 23: 1145-1162.
21. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. US Geological Survey Technical Manual of Water Resources Investigation, Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, Va, 586 pp.
22. Nemeth MS, Solo-Gabriele HM (2002) Evaluation of the use of reach transmissivity to quantify exchange between groundwater and surface water. J Hydrol 274: 145-159.
23. Osman YZ, Bruen MP (2002) Modelling stream-aquifer seepage in alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW. J Hydrol 264: 60-86.
24. Pisinaras V, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Zagana E (2007) A groundwater flow model for water resources management in the Ismarida plain, north Greece. Environ Model Assess 12: 75-89.
25. Pulido-Velazquez AM, Sahuquillo A, Ochoa-Rivera C, Pulido-Velazqueza D (2005) Modeling of stream-aquifer interaction: the embedded multireservoir model. J Hydrol 313: 166-181.
26. Rodríguez LB, Cello PA, Vionnet CA (2005) Modeling stream-aquifer interactions in a shallow aquifer, Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrogeol J 14: 591-602.
27. Ruiz JM (1999) Modelo distribuido para la evaluación de recursos hídricos [Distributed model for water resource assessment]. CEDEX, Madrid, 245 pp.
28. Rushton K (2007) Representation in regional models of saturated river-aquifer interaction for gaining/losing rivers. J Hydrol 334: 262-281.
29. Sanz D (2005) Contribución a la caracterización geométrica de las unidades hidrogeológicas que integran el sistema de acuíferos de la Mancha oriental [Contribution to the geometrical characterization of the hydrogeological unit which forms the Mancha Oriental aquifers system]. PhD Thesis, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
30. Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ, Castaño S, Moratalla A, De las Heras J, Martínez Alfaro PM (2009) Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeological behaviour of the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeol J 17: 1375-1391.
31. Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10: 52-67.
32. Tóth J (1970) A conceptual model of the groundwater regime and the hydrogeological environment. J Hydrol 10: 164-176.
33. Trescott PC (1975) Documentation of a finite difference model for simulation of three dimensional ground-water flow. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 75-438, 48 pp.
34. UCLM (2008) Hydrological model for estimation recharge and evapotranspiration by remote sensing and GIS. UCLM, Albacete, Spain. http://www. hidromore. es/. Cited 12 November 2010.
35. Vázquez-Suñe E, Abarca E, Carrera J, Capino B, Gámez D, Pool M, Simó T, Batlle F, Niñerota JM, Ibáñez X (2006) Groundwater modelling as a tool for the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) application: the Llobregat case. Phys Chem Earth 31: 1015-1029.
36. Winter TC (1995) Recent advances in understanding the interaction of groundwater and surface water. In: U. S. National report to International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 19911994. Rev Geophys 33(Suppl): 985-994.
37. Woessner WW (2000) Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeological thought. Ground Water 38: 423-429.
38. Younger PL (1995) Modelling river-aquifer interactions. In: Younger PL (ed) Proc BHS National Meeting. British Hydrological Society Occasional Paper no. 6, BHS, London.
39. Zume J, Tarhule A (2008) Simulating the impacts of groundwater pumping on stream-aquifer dynamics in semiarid northwestern Oklahoma, USA. Hydrogeol J 16: 797-810.