"Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bird, Lydia ^a   Arthur, Antony ^a   Cox, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REHABILITATION; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DISCLOSURE; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952094476     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-24     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Controlled trials: the 1948 watershed. R Doll, BMJ 1998 317 7167 1217 1220 9794864 (Pubitemid 28488514)
2. Use of randomisation in the Medical Research Council's clinical trial of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis in the 1940s. A Yoshioka, BMJ 1998 317 7167 1220 1223 9794865 (Pubitemid 28488515)
3. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. Medical Research Council, London 2000
4. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, London 2008
5. A model program: exercise intervention for cancer rehabilitation. CM Schneider CA Dennehy M Roozeboom SD Carter, Integrative Cancer Therapies 2002 1 1 76 82 14664750 (Pubitemid 37101541)
6. Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure. KTR Rees S Singh AJS Coats S Ebrahim, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004 3 D003331
7. Physical functioning and quality of life after cancer rehabilitation. E van Weert JEH Hoekstra-Weebers BMF Grol R Otter JH Arendzen K Postema CP van der Schans, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2004 27 1 27 35 10.1097/00004356-200403000-00004 15097167 (Pubitemid 38393498)
8. Rehabilitation programme after stem cell transplantation: randomized controlled trial. L Bird A Arthur T Niblock R Stone L Watson K Cox, J Adv Nurs 2010 66 3 607 615 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05232.x 20423395
9. Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. J Popay, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Supplement 1998 91 35 32 37 (Pubitemid 28335449)
10. Stress among allogeneic bone marrow transplantation patients. H Heinonen L Volin MA Zevon A Uutela C Barrick T Ruutu, Patient Education and Counseling 2005 56 1 62 71 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.007 15590224 (Pubitemid 39601719)
11. Qualitative methods in a randomised controlled trial: the role of an integrated qualitative process evaluation in providing evidence to discontinue the intervention in one arm of a trial of a decision support tool. MJ Murtagh RG Thomson CR May T Rapley BR Heaven RH Graham EF Kaner L Stobbart MP Eccles, Qual Saf Health Care 2007 16 3 224 229 10.1136/qshc.2006.018499 17545351 (Pubitemid 46972868)
12. Contested ground: How should qualitative evidence inform the conduct of a community intervention trial? T Riley P Hawe A Shiell, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2005 10 2 103 110 10.1258/1355819053559029 15831193 (Pubitemid 40562602)
13. Doctor-patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. T Rapley C May B Heaven M Murtagh R Graham EFS Kaner R Thomson, Social Science and Medicine 2006 62 9 2267 2278 10.1016/j.socscimed. 2005.10.011 16290918
14. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? P Hawe A Shiell T Riley, BMJ 2004 328 7455 1561 1563 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561 15217878 (Pubitemid 38850320)
15. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. K Featherstone JL Donovan, BMJ 1998 317 7167 1177 1180 9794849 (Pubitemid 28488505)
16. Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. C Snowdon J Garcia D Elbourne, Soc Sci Med 1997 45 9 1337 1355 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00063-4 9351153 (Pubitemid 27445491)
17. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. SJ Edwards RJ Lilford J Hewison, BMJ 1998 317 7167 1209 1212 9794861 (Pubitemid 28488512)
18. Describing randomisation: patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' practice. V Jenkins L Leach L Fallowfield K Nicholls A Newsham, Br J Cancer 2002 87 8 854 858 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600527 12373599 (Pubitemid 35252960)
19. Women's views of breast cancer treatment and research. Report of a pilot project 1993. P Alderson M Madden A Oakley R Wilkins, London 1994
20. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. NC Campbell E Murray J Darbyshire J Emery A Farmer F Griffiths B Guthrie H Lester P Wilson AL Kinmonth, BMJ 2007 334 7591 455 459 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE 17332585 (Pubitemid 46586602)
21. Who's afraid of the randomised controlled trial? Some dilemmas of the scientific method and 'good' research practice. A Oakley, Women's Health Counts Robertts: Routledge 1990
22. RC Fox, Experiment Perilous, physicians and patients facing the unknown London: Transaction Publishers 1998
23. C Davies, Gender And The Professional Predicament In Nursing Buckingham: Open University Press 1995
24. L Mackay, Conflicts in Care, Medicine and Nursing London: Chapman and Hall 1993
25. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. N Mays C Pope, BMJ 2000 320 7226 50 52 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 10617534 (Pubitemid 30173021)