An improved voting analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis methodology for suppliers selection

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 189-197

  Hadi Vencheh, A ^a   Niazi Motlagh, M ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP); data envelopment analysis (DEA); multi criteria decision making (MCDM); voting analytic hierarchy process (VAHP)

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; PURCHASING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PRODUCTION ECONOMICS; PURCHASING DEPARTMENT; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUPPLIERS SELECTION; VOTING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

EID: 79952088881     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951192X.2011.552528     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abratt, R., 1986. Industrial buying in high-tech markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 15 (4), 293-298.
2. Amin, S.H. and Razmi, J., 2009. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8639-8648.
3. Bevilacqua, M. and Petroni, A., 2002. From traditional purchasing to supplier management: A fuzzy logic-based approach to supplier selection. International Journal of Logistic: Research and Applications, 5 (3), 235-255.
4. Ceyhun, A. and Irem, O., 2007. Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 585-606.
5. Chen, T.C., Lin, C.T., and Huang, S.F., 2006. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102, 289-301.
6. Dickson, G.W., 1966. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2 (1), 5-17.
7. Ding, H., Lyès, B., and Xiaolan, X., 2005. A simulation optimization methodology for supplier selection problem. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18 (2-3), 210-224. (Pubitemid 41663426)
8. Ghodsypour, S.H. and O'Brien, C., 2001. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. International Journal of Production Economics, 73, 15-27. (Pubitemid 32866945)
9. Guneri, A.F. and Kuzu, A., 2009. Supplier selection by using a fuzzy approach in just-in-time: A case study. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,22 (8), 774-783.
10. Hadi-Vencheh, A., 2011. A new nonlinear model for multiple criteria supplier-selection problem. International Journal of Computer integrated Manufactoring, 24 (1), 32-39.
11. Humphreys, P.K., McIvor, R., and Chan, F.T.S., 2003a. Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Systems With Applications, 25, 141-153.
12. Humphreys, P.K., Wong, Y.K., and Chan, F.T.S., 2003b. Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138, 349-356.
13. Kazerooni, A., Chan, F.T.S., and Abhary, K., 1997. A fuzzy integrated decision-making support system for scheduling of FMS using simulation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10, 27-34. (Pubitemid 127769142)
14. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., and Shankar, R., 2004. A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering,46 (1), 69-85.
15. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., and Shankar, R., 2006. A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 101 (2), 273-285. (Pubitemid 43177615)
16. Lee, A.H.I., 2009. A fuzzy ahp evaluation model for buyer-supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (5), 4255-4280.
17. Lehmann, D.R. and O'Shaughnessy, J., 1974. Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 36-42.
18. Lin, H.T. and Chang, W.L., 2008. Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 187 (2), 415-428.
19. Liu, F.H.F. and Hai, H.L., 2005. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 308-317. (Pubitemid 40788676)
20. Min, H. and Galle, W.P., 1999. Electronic commerce usage in business to business purchasing. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (9), 909-921. (Pubitemid 39032260)
21. Noguchi, H., Ogawa, M., and Ishii, H., 2002. The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 146, 155-166. (Pubitemid 34955956)
22. Stavropolous, N., 2000. Suppliers in the new economy. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 50 (4), 27-29.
23. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., and Yang, J.B., 2007. Three new models for preference voting and aggregation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1389-1393. (Pubitemid 47619737)
24. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., and Benton, W.C., 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1), 2-18. (Pubitemid 21654539)
25. Yahya, S. and Kingsman, B., 1999. Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of Operational Research Society, 50, 916-930.