Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in a UK emergency department

European Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 327-329

  Armstrong, Peter ^a   Elliott, Tim ^a   Ronald, Julie ^a   Paterson, Brodie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer aided learning; Computer assisted learning; Education; Interactive; Keywords; Medical students; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TEACHING;

EID: 79952081493     PISSN: 09699546     EISSN: 14735695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32832b6375     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dent JA, Harden RM. A practical guide for medical teachers. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 4.
2. Asgari-Jirhandeh N, Haywood J. Computer awareness among medical students: a survey. Med Educ 1997; 31:225-231.
3. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ 2001; 322:40-44.
4. Qayumi AK, Kurihara Y, Imai M, Pachev G, Seo H, Hoshino Y, et al. Comparison of computer aided instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience). Med Educ 2004; 38:1080-1088.
5. Lynch TG, Steele DJ, Palensky JJ, Lacy NL, Duffy SW. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance: response to computer-aided instruction [abstract]. Am J Surg 2001; 181:368-371.
6. Steele DJ, Palensky JJ, Lynch TG, Lacy NL, Duffy SW. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerised instruction. Med Educ 2002; 36:225-232.
7. Vogel M, Wood DF. Love it or hate it? Medical students’ attitudes to computer-assisted learning. Med Educ 2002; 36:214-215.
8. Carbonaro M, King S, Taylor E, Satzinger F, Snart F, Drummond J. Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course. Med Teach 2008; 30:25-33.
9. Allen EB, Walls RT, Reilly FD. Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy. Med Teach 2008; 30:40-47.
10. Maley MAL, Harvey JR, Bastiaan de Boer W, Scott NW, Arena GE. Addressing current problems in teaching pathology to medical students: blended learning. Med Teach 2008; 30:e1-e9.