Evaluating the Public Impact of Open Innovation

Australian Economic Review

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 66-72

  Dreyfuss, Rochelle C ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; INNOVATION;

EID: 79952078646     PISSN: 00049018     EISSN: 14678462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2010.00621.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benkler, Y. 2002, 'Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm', Yale Law Journal, vol. 112, pp. 369-446.
2. Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. J. 2008, Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton
3. Cockburn, I. M. 2005, 'Blurred boundaries: Tensions between open scientific resources and commercial exploitation of knowledge in biomedical research', unpublished paper, School of Management, Boston University.
4. Cohen, W. M. and Merrill, S. A. 2003 (eds), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
5. Cohen, W. M. and Walsh, J. P. 2008, 'Real impediments to academic biomedical research', in Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 8, eds A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern, University of Chicago Press.
6. Cohen, W. M. and Walsh, J. P. 2010, 'Access-or not-in academic biomedical research', in Working within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, eds R. C. Dreyfuss, H. First and D. Zimmerman, Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Cook-Deegan, R., DeRienzo, C., Carbone, J., Chandrasekharan, S., Heaney, C. and Conover, C. 2010, 'Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers to colon cancers', Genetics in Medicine, vol. 12, pp. S15-38.
8. de Jong, J. P. J. and von Hippel, E. 2009, 'Transfers of user process innovations to process equipment producers: A study of Dutch high-tech firms', Research Policy, vol. 38, pp. 1181-91.
9. Dreyfuss, R. C. 1990, 'Expressive genericity: Trademarks as language in the Pepsi generation', Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 65, pp. 397-424.
10. Dreyfuss, R. C. 2008, 'Reconciling trademark rights and expressive values: How to stop worrying and learn to love ambiguity', in Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, eds G. B. Dinwoodie and M. D. Janis, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
11. Dreyfuss, R. C. 2010, 'Does IP need IP? Accommodating intellectual production outside the intellectual property paradigm', Cardozo Law Review, vol. 31, pp. 1437-73.
12. Gault, F. and von Hippel, E. 2009, 'The prevalence of user innovation and free innovation transfers: Implications for statistical indicators and innovation policy', MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper no. 4722-09, Cambridge, MA
13. Heald, P. J. 2008, 'Property rights and the efficient exploitation of copyright works: An empirical analysis of public domain and copyrighted fiction best sellers', Minnesota Law Review, vol. 92, pp. 1031-63.
14. Heald, P. J. 2009, 'Does the song remain the same? An empirical study of bestselling musical compositions (1913-1932) and their use in cinema (1968-2007)', Case W. Res. L. Rev., vol. 60, pp. 1-46.
15. Huang, Kenneth G. and Murray, Fiona E. 2009, 'Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics', Academy of Management Journal, vol. 52, pp. 1193-221.
16. Mimura, C. 2010, 'Nuanced management of IP rights: Shaping industry-university relationships to promote social impact', in Working within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, eds R. C. Dreyfuss, H. First and D. Zimmerman, Oxford University Press, Oxford
17. Murray, F., Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Kolev, J. and Stern, S. 2009, 'Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation', National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 14819, Cambridge, MA
18. Murray, F. and Stern, S. 2007, 'Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis', Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 63, pp. 648-87.
19. National Research Council 2006, Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
20. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society 2010, Gene Patents and Licensing Practices and Their Impact on Patient Access to Genetic Tests, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
21. von Hippel, E. 2005, Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA