Some consequences of using cigarette machine smoking regimes with different intensities on smoke yields and their variability

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 293-309

  Purkis, Stephen W ^a   Cahours, Xavier ^b   Rey, Miguel ^b   Teillet, Beatrice ^b   Troude, Valerie ^b   Verron, Thomas ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SEITA Imperial Tobacco Group   (France)

Author keywords

Cigarettes; Smoking regimes; Testing; Variability

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE ACETATE; NICOTINE; TAR;

ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESORPTION; FILTER DESIGN; FILTRATION; FLOW RATE; PARTICULATE MATTER; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SMOKE YIELD; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; WATER CONTENT;

CANADA; CARBON MONOXIDE; CELLULOSE; FILTRATION; HUMANS; NICOTINE; SMOKE; SMOKING; TARS; TEMPERATURE; VENTILATION; WATER;

EID: 79952073420     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baker R.R. Variation of sidestream gas formation during the smoking cycle. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1982, 11(4):181-193.
2. Baker R.R., Dixon M., Hill C.A. The incidence and consequences of filter vent blocking amongst British smokers. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1998, 18(2):71-83.
3. Borgerding, M.F., Bodnar, J.A., Wingate D.E., 2000. The 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study - Final Report: Presented to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (accessed September 2010). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/yek21c00.
4. Browne C.L., Keith C.H., Allen R.E. The effect of filter ventilation on the yield and composition of mainstream and sidestream smokes. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1980, 10(2):81-90.
5. Carroll R.J., Ruppert D. Transformation and Weighting in Regression 1988, Chapman and Hall, New York, London.
6. Celanese Corporation, 1985. The effect of cellulose acetate fiber and filter parameters on hot collapse. World Smoking Products. Part 5.18. In Legacy Tobacco Documents Library Bates No. 620972599/2657, pp. 2-7. (accessed October 2010). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/pyt03f00.
7. Centre for Disease Control, 2010. Global Collaborative Study - Method Validation of TNCO in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke, Intense Smoking Regime. ISO/TC126 Working Group 10, Document N66, 5thMay.
8. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Routledge Academic. second ed.
9. CORESTA, 2009. Determination of Nicotine in Cigarette Filters by Gas Chromatographic Analysis, Recommended Method 9. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Recommended_Methods/CRM_09-update2.pdf.
10. Côté, F., Verreault, J., 2010. Overestimation of tar yields at Canadian Intense smoking regime: factors affecting the accuracy. CORESTA Congress, Edinburgh, Paper SSPT38. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Edinburgh2010-SmokeTech.pdf.
11. Counts M.E., Morton M.J., Laffoon S.W., Cox R.H., Lipowicz P.J. Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 41:185-227.
12. Dixon M., Borgerding M.F. Recent advances in the application and understanding of alternative smoking regimes. Recent Adv. Tobacco Sci. 2006, 32:3-83.
13. Hammond D., Wiebel F., Kozlowski L.T., Borland R., Cummings K.M., O'Connor M.J., McNeill A., Connolly G.N., Arnott D., Fong G.T. Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: implications for tobacco control policy. Tobacco Control 2007, 16:8-14.
14. Health Canada, 1999a. Determination of "Tar" , Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke. (accessed September 2010). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/_main-principal/nicotine-eng.php.
15. Health Canada, 1999b. Methods. (accessed September 2010). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/index-eng.php#main.
16. Horowitz W., Kamps L.R., Boyer K.W. Quality assurance in the analysis of food and trace constituents. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1980, 63:1344-1354.
17. Inoue Y., Uhrmeister, P., 2009. The effect of puff conditions on the smolder burn rate of cigarettes smoked on a smoking machine. CORESTA In: Meeting 18-22 October, Aix-en-Provence, France, Paper SSPT49. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Aix2009-SmokeTech.pdf.
18. ISO 5725-2, 1994. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results - Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
19. ISO 10362, 1999. Cigarettes - Determination of Water in Smoke Condensates, Part 1. Gas-chromatographic Method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. ISO 3308, 2000. Routine Analytical Smoking Machine - Definition and Standard Conditions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
21. ISO 4387, 2000. Cigarettes - Determination of Total and Nicotine Free Dry Particulate Matter Using a Routine Analytical Smoking Machine. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
22. ISO 10315, 2000. Cigarettes - Determination of Nicotine in Smoke Condensates - Gas-chromatographic Method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
23. ISO 8243, 2006. Cigarettes - Sampling. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
24. Keuls M. The use of the "studentized range" in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1952, 1:112-122.
25. Lauterbach, J., 2005. The Portland to Bethesda to Atlanta nicotine express - The perils of ignoring particulate phase water when studying gas-particle partitioning of nicotine and other semivolatile organics in cigarette mainstream smoke. In: Tobacco Science Research Conference, Atlanta, USA, Paper 57. (accessed October 2010). http://cigtoxdoc.ehost-services113.com/PortlandBethesdaAtlNicExp.pdf.
26. Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variances 1960, 278-292. Stanford University Press, New York. I. Olkin, H. Hotelling (Eds.).
27. Mariner, D.C., Booty, M., Mullard, G., Shepperd, C.J., 2007. A comparison of German smoker's exposure to tar and nicotine using analysis of smoked cigarette filters with yields from a range of machine smoking regimes. In: 9th Annual European Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Poster Presentation, Madrid, Spain, 3-6 October. (accessed September 2010).
28. McCormack, A.D., Taylor M.J., 2008. The performance of carbon filters at different smoking regimes. In: 62nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Nashville, Paper 62. (accessed June 2010). http://www.tsrcinfo.com/images/62nd_Preliminary_Program_Rev_08-18-08.pdf.
29. Mendes P., Kapur S., Wang J., Feng S., Roethig H. A randomized, controlled exposure study in adult smokers of full flavor Marlboro cigarettes switching to Marlboro Lights or Marlboro Ultra Lights cigarettes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 51:295-305.
30. Muramatsu M., Mikami T., Naito N., Tomita H. A model study on the diffusion and the dilution of low molecular weight gaseous components through cigarette paper during smoking. Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1977, 9:141-146.
31. Newman D. The distribution of range in samples from a normal population, expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 1999, 31(1):20-30. (accessed September 2010). 10.1093/biomet/31.1-2.20.
32. Pankow J.F., Luo W., Tavakoli A.D., Chen C., Isabelle L.M. Delivery levels and behavior of 1,3-butadiene, acrylonitrile, benzene and other toxic volatile organic compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke from two brands of commercial cigarettes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17:805-813.
33. Pickworth, W., Houlgate, P., Schorp, M., Dixon, M., Borgerding, M.F., Zaatari, G., 2005. A review of human smoking behaviour and recommendations for a new ISO standard for machine smoking of cigarettes. Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group 9 Smoking Review Team to ISO/TC126 WG9. (accessed September 2010). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mqt27a00.
34. Polzin G.M., Zhang L., Hearn B.A., Tavakoli A.D., Vaughan C., Ding Y.S., Ashley D.L., Watson C.H. Effect of charcoal-containing cigarette filters on gas phase volatile organic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke. Tobacco Control 2008, 17:10-16.
35. Purkis, S.W., 2008. Yield variability under different smoking regimes. ISO/TC126 Working Group 10, Berlin Meeting, 7 February, Document N10.
36. Purkis S.W., Mueller C., Intorp M., Seidel H. The influence of cigarette designs and smoking regimes on vapour phase yields. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 2010, 24(1):33-46.
37. Purkis S.W., Troude V., Duputié G., Tessier C. Limitations in the characterisation of cigarette brands using different smoking regimes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58:501-515.
38. Rickert, W.S., 2006. Alternative smoking regimes: an investigation of quantitative and qualitative variation in responses. In: CORESTA Conference Held in Paris France 15-20th October, Paper SS5. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Paris2006-SmokeTech-Oct06.pdf.
39. Risner C.H., Cash S.L. A high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of major phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1990, 28:239-244.
40. Saint-Jalm, Y., Borgerding, M.F., Chapman, S.G., Morgan, W.T., 2006. Alternative Smoking Regimes. CORESTA Task Force Report. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Reports/Alternative-Smoking-Regimes-FinalReport-July2006.pdf.
41. St Charles F.K., Kabbani A.A., Borgerding M.F. Estimating the tar and nicotine exposure: human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 56(1):100-110.
42. Takase, K., Miyake, A., 1990. A study of hot collapse in cigarettes during smoking. In: 44th Tobacco Chemists Research Conference, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA, 30th September to 3rd October, Paper 24 (Abstract). (accessed September 2010). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fpf98c00.
43. Taylor, M.J., 2008. The effect of different smoking regimes on the performance of different weights and activities of carbon in cigarette filters. In: CORESTA Congress, Shanghai, 2-6 November, Paper 33. (accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Shanghai2008-SmokeTech.pdf.
44. Teillet, B., Cahours, X., Purkis, S.W., 2009. Investigation of filter temperatures and desorption of volatiles from carbon filters under different smoking regimes. In: CORESTA Meeting 18-22 October, Aix-en-Provence, France, Paper SSPT02. (Accessed September 2010). http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Aix2009-SmokeTech.pdf.
45. Townsend, D., 1983. The effects of tobacco moisture on the removal of cigarette smoke by the tobacco rods. In: 37th Tobacco Chemists Research Conference 1983. (accessed September 2010). http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ybv82a00.
46. World Health Organization, 2008. The Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation. Second Report of a WHO Study Group. WHO Technical Report Series 951. ISBN 978 92 4 120951 9. (accessed September 2010). http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/publications/tsr_951/en/index.html.
47. Zha, C., Robertson, R., Lockhart, J., Coburn, H., 2006. Temperature profile of cigarette filters with different designs. In: 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference 2006 17-20th September Montreal Canada Paper 50. (accessed September 2010). http://www.tsrcinfo.com/images/60th_TSRC_Tentative_Program_28_June_2006_.pdf.