Estimating tar and nicotine exposure: Human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 100-110

  St Charles, F K ^a   Kabbani, A A ^a,c   Borgerding, M F ^b  

^a Brown and Williamson Tobacco Company   (United States)

^b R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Filter analysis; Mouth exposure; Nicotine; Smoking behavior; Tar; Tobacco smoke

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE; MENTHOL; NICOTINE; TAR; TOBACCO SMOKE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOUTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINALYSIS;

ADULT; CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, ANALYTICAL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NICOTINE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SMOKE; SMOKING; TARS; TOBACCO;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 75549086656     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Statistics notes: units of analysis. BMJ 1997, 314:1874.
2. ANVISA, 2003. Resolution RDC No. 14 of January 17, 2003, Article 5 in (Portuguese) Federal Official Gazette No. 14 of January 20, 2003, Section 1. p. 38.
3. Armitage A.K., Dixon M., Frost B.E., Mariner D.C., Sinclair N.M. The effect of inhalation volume and breath-hold duration on the retention of nicotine and solanesol in the human respiratory tract and on subsequent plasma nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 2004, 21(4):240-249.
4. Ashton H., Watson D.W. Puffing frequency and nicotine intake in cigarette smokers. Br. Med. J. 1970, 3(5724):679-681.
5. Ashton H., Stepney R., Thompson J.W. Self-titration by cigarette smokers. Br. Med. J. 1979, 2(6186):357-360.
6. Baker R.R., Dixon M., Hill C. The incidence and consequences of filter vent blocking amongst British smokers. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1998, 18(2):71-83.
7. Benowitz N.L., Jacob P. Daily intake of nicotine during cigarette smoking. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1984, 35(4):499-504. Data from Fig. 4.
8. Benowitz N.L., Jacob P. Nicotine and cotinine elimination pharmacokinetics in smokers and nonsmokers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1993, 53(3):316-323.
9. Benowitz N.L., Jacob P. Metabolism of nicotine to cotinine studied by a dual isotope method. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1994, 56(5):483-493.
10. Benowitz N.L., Porchet H., Sheiner L., Jacob P. Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1988, 44(1):23-28.
11. Benowitz N.L., Jacob P., Fong I., Gupta S. Nicotine metabolic profile in man: comparison of cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994, 268(1):296-303.
12. Byrd G.D., Robinson J.H., Caldwell W.S., deBethizy J.D. Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1995, 122(2):95-103.
13. Byrd G.D., Davis R.A., Caldwell W.S., Robinson J.H., deBethizy J.D. A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1998, 139(4):291-299.
14. Canada, 2000. Tobacco reporting regulations. T-11.5/SOR/2000-272.
15. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1997. Tobacco disclosure act. General laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 94, Section 307B, 105 CMR 660.000. Cigarette and smokeless tobacco products: reports of added constituents and nicotine ratings.
16. DeBardeleben M.Z., Wickham J.E., Kuhn W.F. The determination of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke from a historical perspective. Rec. Adv. Tob. Sci. 1991, 17:115-148.
17. Dwyer R.W., Abel S.G. The efficiencies of cellulose acetate filters. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1986, 13(5):243-253.
18. Federal Trade Commission, 1967a. Cigarettes: testing for tar and nicotine content. Fed. Regist. 32, 11178.
19. Federal Trade Commission, 1967b. FTC to begin cigarette testing. News Release of the Federal Trade Commission, 1 August, Washington, DC.
20. Federal Trade Commission, 2008. Rescission of FTC guidance concerning the Cambridge filter method. Fed. Regist. 73, 74500.
21. Forbes W.F., Robinson J.C., Hanley J.A., Colburn H.N. Studies on the nicotine exposure of individual smokers. I. Changes in mouth level exposure to nicotine on switching to lower nicotine cigarettes. Int. J. Addict. 1976, 11(6):933-950.
22. Frost, B.E., Mariner, D.C., Sinclair, N.M., 1998. Factors relating to nicotine physio-chemistry and retention in human smokers. In: Proceedings of the CORESTA Congress, October, Brighton, UK, pp. 211-218.
23. Gori G.B., Lynch C.J. Smoker intake from cigarettes in the 1-mg Federal Trade Commission tar class. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1983, 3(2):110-120.
24. Gori G.B., Lynch C.J. Analytical cigarette yields as predictors of smoke bioavailability. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1985, 5(3):314-326. Data from Fig. 4.
25. Gori G.B., Benowitz N.L., Lynch C.J. Mouth versus deep airway absorption of nicotine in cigarette smokers. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1986, 25(6):1181-1186.
26. Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health, 1988. Fourth report of the Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.
27. Jacob P., Benowitz N.L., Shulgin A.T. Recent studies of nicotine metabolism in humans. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1988, 30(1):249-253.
28. Jarvis M.J., Boreham R., Primatesta P., Feyerabend C., Bryant A. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93(2):134-138.
29. Koop C.E. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction 1988, Public Health Services, Washington, DC, pp. 155-157.
30. Mendes P., Kapur S., Wang J., Feng S., Roethig H. A randomized, controlled exposure study in adult smokers of full flavor Marlboro cigarettes switching to Marlboro Lights or Marlboro Ultra Lights cigarettes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 51(3):295-305.
31. Moldoveanu S.C., St.Charles F.K. Differences in the chemical composition of the particulate phase of inhaled and exhaled cigarette mainstream smoke. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 2007, 22(4):290-302.
32. Nelson, P.R., Campbell, A., Brown, B., Brown, D., 2005. Storage stability of filters for yield-in-use measurements. In: 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, vol. 59. Paper 78, p. 61.
33. Norman V., Ihrig A.M., Shoffner R.A., Ireland M.S. The effect of tip dilution on the filtration efficiency of upstream and downstream segments of cigarette filters. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 1984, 12(4):178-185.
34. Overton J.R. Filtration of cigarette smoke: relative contributions of inertial impaction, diffusional deposition, and direct interception. Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1973, 7(3):117-120.
35. Pritchard W.S., Robinson J.H. Examining the relationship between usual brand nicotine yield, blood cotinine concentration and the nicotine compensation hypothesis. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1996, 124(3):282-284.
36. Rawbone R.G. Switching to low tar cigarettes: are the tar league tables relevant?. Thorax 1984, 39(9):657-662.
37. Rickert W.S., Robinson J.C. Estimating the hazards of less hazardous cigarettes. II. Study of cigarette yields of nicotine, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen cyanide in relation to levels of cotinine, carboxyhemoglobin, and thiocyanate in smokers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1981, 7(3-4):391-403.
38. Russell M.A.H., Sutton S.R., Iyer R., Feyerabend C., Vessey C.J. Long term switching to low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes. Br. J. Addict. 1982, 77(2):145-158.
39. Scherer G. Smoking behavior and compensation: a review of the literature. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1999, 145(1):1-20.
40. Shepperd C.J., St.Charles F.K., Lien M., Dixon M. Validation of methods for determining consumer smoked cigarette yields from cigarette filter analysis. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 2006, 22:176-184.
41. Sloan C.H., Curran J.G. Spectrophotometric determination of filtration of cigarette filters. Tob. Sci. 1981, 25:57-60.
42. St.Charles, F.K., 2001. A robust method for determining consumer smoked cigarette yields from filter analytical data. In: 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, vol. 55. Paper 92. pp.73-74.
43. St.Charles F.K., Kabbani A.A., Ogden M. Smoking behavior: how close to the tipping do consumers actually smoke?. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 2005, 8:433-438.
44. St.Charles F.K., Krautter G.R., Dixon M., Mariner D.C. A comparison of nicotine dose estimates in smokers between filter analysis, salivary cotinine, and urinary excretion of nicotine metabolites. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2006, 189:345-354.
45. State of Texas, 1997. Health and Safety Code, Subtitle H, Chapter 161, Subchapter P, Disclosure of ingredients in cigarettes and tobacco products.
46. Stephen A., Frost C., Thompson S., Wald N. Estimating the extent of compensatory smoking. Nicotine Smoking and the Low Tar Programme 1989, 100-115. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford. N. Wald, P. Froggatt (Eds.).
47. Watson C., McCraw J., Polzin G., Ashley D. Development of a method to assess cigarette smoke intake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38(1):248-253.
48. Zacny J.P., Stitzer M.L., Brown F.J., Yingling J.E., Griffiths R.R. Human cigarette smoking: effects of puff and inhalation parameters on smoke exposure. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1987, 240(2):554-564.