Impact of medicare prospective payment system on acute rehabilitation outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 346-351

  Qu, Haiyan ^a   Shewchuk, Richard M ^a   Chen, Yuying ^b   Deutsch, Anne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Length of stay; Prospective payment system; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79952065320     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.236     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J.D. Murer IRF perspective payment system: an update Rehab Manag 21 2008 37 39
2. M.G. Stineman Prospective payment, prospective challenge Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 2002 1802 1805 (Pubitemid 35424707)
3. M.G. Stineman, J.J. Escarce, J.E. Goin, B.B. Hamilton, C.V. Granger, and S.V. Williams A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation Med Care 32 1994 366 379
4. R. Gillen, H. Tennen, and T. McKee The impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke program outcomes Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 2007 356 363 (Pubitemid 46652192)
5. D. Dobrez, A.W. Heinnemann, A. Deutsch, and T. Mallinson Impact of Medicare's prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke patient outcomes Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89 2010 198 204
6. A. Kramer, D. Holthaus, G. Goodrish, and A. Epstein A study of stroke post-acute care costs and outcomes: final report Executive summary 2006 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington (DC)
7. N. Sood, M.B. Buntin, and J.J. Escarce Does how much and how you pay matter? Evidence from the inpatient rehabilitation care prospective payment system J Health Econ 27 2008 1046 1059
8. R.M. Scheffier, D.G. Glement, and S.D. Sullivan The hospital responses to Medicare's prospective payment system: an econometric model of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans Med Care 32 1994 471 485
9. A. Muller Medicare prospective payment reforms and hospital utilization Temporary or lasting effects? Med Care 31 1993 296 308
10. R.D. Zorowitz Inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the prospective payment system: lessons learned Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 45 2009 259 263
11. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Annual statistical report for the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems 2006 Univ of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham
12. H. Qu, R.M. Shewchuk, Y. Chen, and J.S. Richards Evaluating the quality of acute rehabilitation care for patients with spinal cord injury: an extended Donabedian model Qual Manag Health Care 19 2010 47 61
13. S.L. Stover, M.J. DeVivo, and B.K. Go History, implementation, and current status of the National Spinal Cord Injury Database Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 1999 1365 1371 (Pubitemid 29526632)
14. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM™ instrument), version 5.1 1997 State Univ of New York at Buffalo Buffalo
15. K.J. Ottenbacher, Y. Hsu, C.V. Granger, and R.C. Fiedler The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1226 1232 (Pubitemid 26424833)
16. K.M. Hall, M.E. Cohen, J. Wright, M. Call, and P. Werner Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 1999 1471 1476 (Pubitemid 29526646)
17. A. Deutsch, C.V. Granger, C. Russell, A.W. Heinemann, and K.J. Ottenbacher Apparent changes in inpatient rehabilitation facility outcomes due to a change in the definition of program interruption Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 2008 2274 2277
18. C.V. Granger, A. Deutsch, C. Russell, T. Black, and K.J. Ottenbacher Modification of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86 2007 883 892 (Pubitemid 351339385)
19. G.M. Carter, and S.M. Paddock Preliminary analyses of changes in coding and case mix under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system 2005 RAND Corp Santa Monica
20. R.J. Marino International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury J Spinal Cord Med 26 Suppl 1 2003 S50 S56
21. P.K. Shah, A.W. Heinemann, and L.M. Manheim The effect of Medicare's prospective payment system on patient satisfaction Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86 Medicare issue 2007 169 175
22. K.J. Ottenbacher, P.M. Smith, S.B. Illig, R.T. Linn, G.V. Ostir, and C.V. Granfer Trends in length of stay, living setting, functional outcome, and mortality following medical rehabilitation JAMA 292 2004 1687 1695 (Pubitemid 39346670)
23. D.G. Dobrez, A.T. Lo Sasso, and A.W. Heinemann The effect of prospective payment on rehabilitative care Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 2004 1909 1914 (Pubitemid 39593514)
24. R.R. Kulesher The impact of PPS on hospital-sponsored post-acute services: a case study of Delaware Medicare providers J Healthcare Manag 53 2008 54 68
25. E.A. Eastwood, K.J. Hagglund, K.T. Ragnarsson, W.A. Gordon, and R.J. Marino Medical rehabilitation length of stay and outcomes for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury19901997 Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 1999 1457 1463 (Pubitemid 29526644)
26. S.L. Stover, K.M. Hall, J.A. DeLisa, and W.H. Donovan System benefits S.L. Stover, J.A. DeLisa, G.G. Whiteneck, Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the Model Systems 1995 Aspen Gaithersburg 319 326