The effect of prospective payment on rehabilitative care

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1909-1914

  Dobrez, Deborah G ^a,b   Lo Sasso, Anthony T ^b   Heinemann, Allen W ^b,c  

^a Evanston NW Hlthcare Chicago I   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Medicare; Prospective payment system; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GROUP THERAPY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL BILLING; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATION; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 9944244011     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.064     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. P.R. Mistry, D.G. Litaker Surviving the prospective payment system potential problems and solutions to ensure quality of care Am J Manag Care 6 2000 1305 1311
2. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission Post-acute providers. Report and recommendations to the Congress 1997 US Government Printing Office Washington (DC)
3. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Final rule. 66 Federal Register 41315 (2001).
4. M. Reynolds Final inpatient rehabilitation PPS rule improves on proposed rule Health Financ Manage 55 10 2001 68 70
5. M.A. Rosenberg, M.J. Browne The impact of the inpatient prospective payment system and diagnosis-related groups a survey of the literature North Am Actuarial J 5 4 2001 84 94
6. N. Bray, C. Carter, A. Dobson, J.M. Watt, S. Shortell An examination of winners and losers under Medicare's prospective payment system Health Care Manage Rev 19 1 1994 44 55
7. J. Feinglass, J.J. Holloway The initial impact of the Medicare prospective payment system on U.S. health care a review of the literature Med Care Rev 48 1991 91 115
8. K.L. Kahn, E.B. Keeler, M.J. Sherwood Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system JAMA 264 1990 1984 1988
9. K.L. Kahn, L.V. Rubenstein, D. Draper The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients. An introduction to the series JAMA 264 1990 1953 1955
10. K.B. Wells, W.H. Rogers, L.M. Davis Quality of care for depressed elderly pre-post prospective payment system differences in response across treatment settings Med Care 32 1994 257 276
11. E. Hutt, M. Ecord, T.B. Eilertsen, E. Frederickson, J.C. Kowalsky, A.M. Kramer Prospective payment for nursing homes increased therapy provision without improving community discharge rates J Am Geriatr Soc 49 2001 1071 1079
12. R.L. Kane, M. Finch, L. Blewett, Q. Chen, R. Burns, M. Moskowitz Use of post-hospital care by Medicare patients J Am Geriatr Soc 44 1996 242 250
13. D. Banks, E. Parker, J. Wendel Strategic interaction among hospitals and nursing facilities the efficiency effects of payment systems and vertical integration Health Econ 10 2 2001 119 134
14. C.L. Flick Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Stroke outcome and psychosocial consequences Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 5 Suppl 1 1999 S21 S26
15. R. Sandstrom, P. Mokler, K. Hoppe Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 1998 762 765
16. C.V. Granger, B.B. Hamilton, R.C. Fiedler Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation Stroke 23 1992 978 982
17. N. Harada, S. Sofaer, G. Kominski Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation. Implications for prospective payment Med Care 31 1993 345 357
18. R.L. Harvey, E.J. Roth, A.W. Heinemann, L.L. Lovell, J.R. McGuire, S. Diaz Stroke rehabilitation clinical predictors of resource utilization Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 1998 1349 1355
19. R. Ellis, T. McGuire Optimal payment systems for health services J Health Econ 9 1990 375 396
20. R. Ellis, T. McGuire Supply-side and demand side cost sharing in health care J Econ Perspect 7 4 1993 135 151
21. B.H. Gilman Measuring hospital cost-sharing incentives under refined prospective payment J Econ Manage Strategy 8 1999 433 452
22. M. McClellan Hospital reimbursement incentives an empirical approach J Econ Manage Strategy 6 1997 91 128
23. L. Chan, T.D. Koepsell, R.A. Deyo The effect of Medicare's payment system for rehabilitation hospitals on length of stay, charges, and total payments N Engl J Med 337 1997 978 985
24. R.K. Bode, A.W. Heinemann Functional improvement patterns during rehabilitation for stroke, TBI, and SCI patients [abstract] Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 1998 1325
25. K.J. Ottenbacher, Y. Hsu, C.V. Granger, R.C. Fiedler The reliability of the functional independence measure a quantitative review Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1226 1232
26. M.G. Stineman, J.A. Shea, A. Jette The Functional Independence Measure tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1101 1108
27. D. Kidd, G. Stewart, J. Baldry The Functional Independence Measure a comparative validity and reliability study Disabil Rehabil 17 1995 10 14
28. N. Duan Smearing estimate a nonparametric transformation method J Am Stat Assoc 78 1983 605 610
29. D. Sulch, L. Kalra Integrated care pathways in stroke management Age Ageing 29 2000 349 352
30. J.M. Hoffman, J.N. Doctor, L. Chan, J. Whyte, A. Jha, S. Dikmen Potential impact of the new Medicare prospective payment system on reimbursement for traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 2003 1165 1172
31. S.M. Schmidt, L. Guo, S.J. Scheer Changes in the status of hospitalized stroke patients since inception of the prospective payment system in 1983 Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 2002 894 898
32. K.L. Kahn, W.H. Rogers, L.V. Rubenstein Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system JAMA 264 1990 1969 1973
33. D.C. Hsia, W.M. Krushat, A.B. Fagan, J.A. Tebbutt, R.P. Kusserow Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system N Engl J Med 318 1988 352 355
34. B. Steinwald, L.A. Dummit Hospital case-mix change sicker patients or DRG creep? Health Aff (Millwood) 8 2 1989 35 47
35. G.S. Chulis Assessing Medicare's prospective payment system for hospitals Med Care Rev 48 1991 167 206